The objective of this review of reviews was to identify the reasons for missed nursing care and to shed light on how nurses prioritize what care they miss. Missed nursing care refers to essential nursing activities or tasks that are omitted or not completed as planned during a patient’s care. This omission can result from various factors, such as staffing shortages, time constraints, or communication issues, and it can potentially compromise the quality of patient care and safety. Identifying and addressing missed nursing care is crucial to ensure optimal patient outcomes and the well-being of healthcare professionals. To be included, reviews had to use the systematic review process, be available in the English language, examine missed care in hospitals and at home, and include participants who were over eighteen years old. The review intended to answer the following questions: ‘Why nursing care is missed?’ ‘How nurses prioritize what care they missed?’. An umbrella review was developed guided by the JBI methodology and using PRISMA-ScR. A total of 995 reviews were identified. According to the inclusion criteria, only nine reviews were finally evaluated. The findings indicate that care is missed due to staffing levels, organizational problems, and the working climate. Prioritization of care depends on acute care needs as well as educational and experiential background. Missed nursing care is associated with patient safety and the quality of provided nursing care. Specifically, it has negative impacts on patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare service units. Organizational characteristics, nursing unit features, and the level of teamwork among nursing staff affect Missed Nursing Care. Individual demographic characteristics of the staff, professional roles, work schedules, and adequate staffing may potentially contribute to the occurrence of Missed Nursing Care, which is why they are under investigation. However, further consideration is needed regarding the management of patient needs and nurse prioritization.

This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) in Greek medical doctors. A cross-sectional study design was conducted, including 120 physicians at clinical setting in 2019 (men 64.5%). A self-report questionnaire, including socio-demographic data and the Euthanasia Attitude Scale, which assesses attitudes towards euthanasia, were used for data collection. The mean (standard deviation) of the EAS were 74.62 (14.33). The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.944 and the confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the validity of the EAS scale, after modification effects, revealed an acceptable adjustment for the questionnaire. The GFI index was above 0.8 and close to 0.9, and the CFI index was above 0.9, which is the acceptable limit. The RMSEA index was acceptable below 0.08. The total Gr-EAS correlated with all five factors (Pearson r = 0.400–0.973, p < 0.001). According to the findings of this study, the Euthanasia Attitude Scale is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the attitudes toward euthanasia in Greek physicians. This Greek adaptation will be valuable in future studies examining the attitude of physicians towards euthanasia.

Background: Moral harassment (mobbing) in healthcare, particularly among nurses, remains a persistent issue with detrimental effects on mental health, resilience, and quality of life. Aim: We examine the relationship between the resilience of nurses working in Emergency Departments (EDs) and how these factors influence experiences of workplace mobbing. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 nurses from four public hospitals in Greece’s 5th Health District. Data were collected between October 2023 and March 2024 using the WHOQOL-BREF, Workplace Psychologically Violent Behaviors (WPVB) scale and the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The sample consisted primarily of full-time nurses (84.3% female; mean age = 43.1 years), with 21.1% reporting chronic conditions. Most participants were married (80.0%) and had children (74.4%), typically two (56.1%). Statistical analyses—conducted using SPSS version 27.0—included descriptive statistics, Pearson and Spearman correlations, multiple linear regression, and mediation analysis, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Resilience was moderate (mean = 66.38%; Cronbach’s α = 0.93) and positively correlated with all WHOQOL-BREF domains—physical, psychological, social, and environmental (r = 0.30–0.40)—but not with the overall WHOQOL-BREF. The mean overall WHOQOL-BREF score was 68.4%, with the lowest scores observed in the environmental domain (mean = 53.76%). Workplace mobbing levels were low to moderate (mean WPVB score = 17.87), with subscale reliabilities ranging from α = 0.78 to 0.95. Mobbing was negatively associated with social relationships and the environmental WHOQOL-BREF (ρ = –0.23 to –0.33). Regression analysis showed that cohabitation and higher resilience significantly predicted better WHOQOL-BREF outcomes, whereas mobbing was not a significant predictor. Mediation analysis (bootstrap N = 5000) indicated no significant indirect effect of resilience in the relationship between mobbing and WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusions: Resilience was identified as a key protective factor for nurses’ quality of life in emergency care settings. Although workplace mobbing was present at low-to-moderate levels, it was negatively associated with specific WHOQOL-BREF domains. Enhancing mental resilience among nurses may serve as a valuable strategy to mitigate the psychological effects of moral harassment in healthcare environments.

The exposure of employees to specific risks is usually due to increasing levels of work-related stress, which negatively affects their skills and effectiveness in their job duties, lead-ing to the onset of physical/mental illnesses, mistakes, or even accidents. The aim of this study is to investigate the psychosocial risks experienced by nurses in tertiary hospitals in Greece and their association with their attitudes towards safety and the occurrence of medication errors. The research was conducted in four tertiary hospitals in Greece, with the participation of 514 nurses of all educational levels. Questionnaires were used to collect data on work-related stress, professional burnout, and medication errors. The results highlighted that psychosocial risks, such as high work pressure and lack of support, are directly linked to professional burnout and an increased likelihood of medication errors. The necessity of social support, job autonomy, and work-life balance are underscored as critical factors for reducing stress and improving the quality of care. Specific strategies are proposed to enhance the mental health of nurses and improve working conditions.

Background and Aim: Digital skills of healthcare professionals are recognized as critical for the successful digital transformation of healthcare. The present study aims to examine the relationship between the digital skills of healthcare professionals and the organizational structures of hospitals. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, using the convenience sampling method, 857 healthcare professionals, working in Greek military and civilian hospitals, voluntarily participated. Data were collected between July and November 2021 through a structured questionnaire, based on the Digital Competence framework. Digital skills were categorized into five subscales: information, communication, content creation, problem solving, and safety skills. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 26.0, with p-values 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Cronbach’s alpha values for all subscales were (α)>0.8, indicating high reliability. Younger participants showed higher scores (p 0.001). The mean scores for information, communication, content creation, problem solving and safety skills in military hospitals were calculated as 52.1 (SD=32.3), 50.6 (SD=31.8), 48.4 (SD=33.3), 49.8 (SD =30.8) and 52.8 (SD=34.1) respectively, while in civilian hospitals they were calculated as 45.1 (SD=32.2), 44.5 (SD=29.5), 41.8 (SD=32.4), 41.5 (SD=30.8) and 47.1 (SD=34.5) respectively. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals in military hospitals exhibit higher digital competence compared to their counterparts in civilian hospitals. Identifying the organizational factors that promote greater digital competence among healthcare professionals provides essential information to policymakers and healthcare managers for implementing targeted organizational improvements.