Today, European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seems to be a markedly successful tree species in the north-east of its distribution range. The distribution area may be larger than originally assumed; past forest management is probably the main cause of the contraction in the postglacial European beech range. Numerous attempts consistently have failed to locate a distinct distribution edge for European beech. Therefore, we define northern and eastern Poland and the southern regions of the Baltic States as margins of European beech distribution. Ecophysiological approaches have identified the drought constraints for European beech in terms of (1) the critical limit for xylem cavitation and loss of hydraulic conductivity, reached at a shoot water potential of –1.9 MPa, and (2) a reduction in gross primary production and total ecosystem respiration when relative extractable soil water reaches 40 and 20 per cent, respectively. However, it is difficult to correlate European beech distribution margins with single macro-climatic factors. Moreover, the adaptation of European beech populations and provenances to drought and frost varies. The phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary adaptability of European beech appear to be underestimated. These characteristics may counteract a further contraction of the European beech range arising from climate change in the future.

Global climate change is expected to further raise the frequency and severity of extreme events, such as droughts. The effects of extreme droughts on trees are difficult to disentangle given the inherent complexity of drought events (frequency, severity, duration, and timing during the growing season). Besides, drought effects might be modulated by trees’ phenotypic variability, which is, in turn, affected by long‐term local selective pressures and management legacies. Here we investigated the magnitude and the temporal changes of tree‐level resilience (i.e., resistance, recovery, and resilience) to extreme droughts. Moreover, we assessed the tree‐, site‐, and drought‐related factors and their interactions driving the tree‐level resilience to extreme droughts. We used a tree‐ring network of the widely distributed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) along a 2,800 km latitudinal gradient from southern Spain to northern Germany. We found that the resilience to extreme drought decreased in mid‐elevation and low productivity sites from 1980–1999 to 2000–2011 likely due to more frequent and severe droughts in the later period. Our study showed that the impact of drought on tree‐level resilience was not dependent on its latitudinal location, but rather on the type of sites trees were growing at and on their growth performances (i.e., magnitude and variability of growth) during the predrought period. We found significant interactive effects between drought duration and tree growth prior to drought, suggesting that Scots pine trees with higher magnitude and variability of growth in the long term are more vulnerable to long and severe droughts. Moreover, our results indicate that Scots pine trees that experienced more frequent droughts over the long‐term were less resistant to extreme droughts. We, therefore, conclude that the physiological resilience to extreme droughts might be constrained by their growth prior to drought, and that more frequent and longer drought periods may overstrain their potential for acclimation.

Key message: Climate change is posing a considerable challenge to foresters. The intensity of required adaptive measures and the relevance of old-growth forests as benchmark for managed forests are debated. Forest managers need to make decisions on stand treatment that are based on climatological and biological parameters with high uncertainties. We provided the conceptual basis for adaptive forest management and provide a number of case studies that reflect the options and limitations of ways of coping with climate change. The examples are derived from the experience of the authors. We conclude that only few forest types are either not strongly affected by climate change or do not require immediate adaptations of forest management. Many productive forests have stand properties that are decisively shaped by past management decisions, such as tree species composition, age distribution, rotation period, and stand structure. Maintaining these properties under the influence of climate change requires continuous and even increasing efforts of forest managers.