In this paper, we provide theoretical and policy support for quota-allocation strategies based on a national unified renewable energy (RE) power market. Renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) are of great significance in promoting the stable development of renewable energy and improving power market decision making in China’s power industry. To resolve the geographical, resource allocation, and power-grid problems of multi-regional RE power generation, we constructed a regional distribution optimization model with the lowest cost under the RPS policy and designed a set of dynamic distribution mechanisms based on the renewable energy power quota index. The results show that it is necessary to prioritize development of wind-generated power on the North China and Northeast Power Grids, solar energy on the Northwest Power Grid, and biomass energy generation on grids in other regions to plan specific task undertakings and allocate RE power generation to each grid. We propose a multi-regional power distribution model at the lowest cost under the RPS policy to provide solutions and references for renewable energy power market quota allocation.

Low carbon has become a highly relevant topic in today’s society, particularly for manufacturing enterprises. To gain insight into how manufacturing enterprises embedded in the industrial internet platform make decisions regarding low-carbon technology innovation, this article examines the service quality of the platform, the low-carbon preferences of the manufacturing enterprises, and government subsidy factors. A platform ecological system game model, comprised of a single manufacturing enterprise and an industrial internet platform, is then established. The results indicate that, under the model’s assumptions, the decarbonization of production can only occur when the cost of low-carbon innovation is below a specific threshold. Decentralized decision making is more effective in promoting low-carbon innovation by the manufacturing enterprises when the cost of low-carbon technology innovation is low. The greater the service quality of the industrial internet platform, the stronger the positive influence of the low-carbon preferences of users and government subsidies on the low-carbon innovation level of the manufacturing enterprises. This study offers useful decision-making advice for both the industrial internet platform and the manufacturing enterprises.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide scientific guidance for the integration of industrialization and information (TIOII). In recent years, TIOII has promoted the development of intelligent manufacturing in China. However, many enterprises blindly invest in TIOII, which affects their normal production and operation. Design/methodology/approach: This study establishes an efficiency evaluation model for TIOII. In this paper, entropy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) constraint cone and cross-efficiency are added based on traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, and entropy AHP–cross-efficiency DEA model is proposed. Then, statistical analysis is carried out on the integration efficiency of enterprises in Guangzhou using cross-sectional data, and the traditional DEA model and entropy AHP–cross-efficiency DEA model are used to analyze the integration efficiency of enterprises. Findings: The data show that the efficiency of enterprise integration is at a medium level in Guangzhou. The efficiency of enterprise integration has no significant relationship with enterprise size and production type but has a low negative correlation with the development level of enterprise integration. In addition, the improved DEA model can better reflect the real integration efficiency of enterprises and obtain complete ranking results. Originality/value: By adding the entropy AHP constraint cone and cross-efficiency, the traditional DEA model is improved. The improved DEA model can better reflect the real efficiency of TIOII and obtain complete ranking results.

Against the backdrop of the ongoing advancement of the “dual carbon” goals and the carbon emission trading system, green innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises faces multiple practical constraints, including financing constraints, technological commercialization risk, and market recognition costs. To examine the mechanism through which government regulation affects firms’ green innovation behavior, this study develops a four-party evolutionary game model involving government, small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises, consumers, and investment institutions, and analyzes the strategic interactions and dynamic evolution of these actors. The results show that regulatory intensity, consumer green preference, and financial support from investment institutions all exert significant effects on green innovation decisions in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Whether firms choose substantive green innovation depends primarily on such key factors as financing uncertainty, technological commercialization risk, the intensity of government penalties, and the level of policy incentives. Further stability analysis and numerical simulations indicate that stronger administrative penalties significantly increase the likelihood that firms adopt substantive green innovation and also promote green consumption among consumers. This effect becomes more pronounced when financing uncertainty declines. At the same time, stronger policy incentives for green investment enhance the willingness of investment institutions to participate in green projects, and this effect is further reinforced when technological commercialization risk is reduced. The findings suggest that green innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises is characterized by strong multi-actor interdependence. Its evolutionary outcome is shaped not only by regulatory pressure, but also by green financial support, the conditions for technological commercialization, and market demand. Accordingly, sustained green innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises requires coordinated efforts to improve regulatory arrangements, strengthen green finance support systems, reduce the cost of technological commercialization, and cultivate green consumer markets.