Miguel Pessanha Pais

Dr. Miguel Pessanha Pais

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2014 in Ocean & Coastal Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarisa I. Batista
Marisa I. Batista
SHSofia Henriques
Sofia Henriques
MPMiguel Pessanha Pais
Miguel Pessanha Pais
HCHenrique Cabral
Henrique Cabral

1 May 2019 in Marine Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIrina A. Duarte
Irina A. Duarte
MPMiguel Pessanha Pais
Miguel Pessanha Pais
PRPatrick Reis-Santos
Patrick Reis-Santos
HCHenrique Cabral
Henrique Cabral
Vanessa F. FonsecaVanessa F. Fonseca
Vanessa F. Fonseca

19 March 2014 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSofia Henriques
Sofia Henriques
MPMiguel Pessanha Pais
Miguel Pessanha Pais
RVR P Vasconcelos
R P Vasconcelos
AMAlberto G Murta
Alberto G Murta
MAManuela Azevedo
Manuela Azevedo
HCHenrique Cabral
Henrique Cabral

30 July 2018 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMiguel Pessanha Pais
Miguel Pessanha Pais
HCHenrique Cabral
Henrique Cabral
Bias in underwater visual census has always been elusive. In fact, the choice of sampling method and the behavioural traits of fish are two of the most important factors affecting bias, but they are still treated separately, which leads to arbitrarily chosen sampling methods. FishCensus, a two-dimensional agent-based model with realistic fish movement, was used to simulate problematic behavioural traits in SCUBA diving visual census methods and understand how sampling methodology affects the precision and bias of counts. Using a fixed true density of 0.3 fish/m2 and a fixed visibility of 6 m, 10 counts were simulated for several combinations of parameters for transects (length, width, speed) and point counts (radius, rotation speed, time), generating trait-specific heatmaps for bias and precision. In general, point counts had higher bias and were less precise than transects. Fish attracted to divers led to the highest bias, while cryptic fish had the most accurate counts. For point counts, increasing survey time increased bias and variability, increasing radius reduced bias for most traits but increased bias in the case of fish that avoid divers. Rotation speed did not have a significant effect in general, but it increased bias for fish that avoid divers. Wider and longer transects and a faster swim speed are beneficial when sampling mobile species, but a narrower, shorter transect with a slow swim is beneficial for cryptic fish.


1 November 2008 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSofia Henriques
Sofia Henriques
MPMiguel Pessanha Pais
Miguel Pessanha Pais
MCMaria José Costa
Maria José Costa
HCHenrique Cabral
Henrique Cabral