Julia Beretov

Dr. Julia Beretov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XBXupeng Bai
Xupeng Bai
JNJie Ni
Jie Ni
JBJulia Beretov
Julia Beretov
PGPeter Graham
Peter Graham
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li

1 January 2021 in Cancer Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XBXupeng Bai
Xupeng Bai
JNJie Ni
Jie Ni
JBJulia Beretov
Julia Beretov
PGPeter Graham
Peter Graham
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li

1 October 2009 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ewan MillarEwan Millar
Ewan Millar
PGPeter H. Graham
Peter H. Graham
SOSandra A. O'Toole
Sandra A. O'Toole
CMCatriona M. McNeil
Catriona M. McNeil
LBLois Browne
Lois Browne
RSRobert L. Sutherland
Robert L. Sutherland
Purpose: To determine the clinical utility of intrinsic molecular phenotype after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation with or without a cavity boost. Patients and Methods: Four hundred ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized trial of BCT with or without a tumor bed radiation boost. Tumors were classified by intrinsic molecular phenotype as luminal A or B, HER-2, basal-like, or unclassified using a five-biomarker panel: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, CK5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methodology were used to ascertain relationships to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and death from breast cancer. Results: Median follow-up was 84 months. Three hundred ninety-four patients were classified as luminal A, 23 were luminal B, 52 were basal, 13 were HER-2, and 16 were unclassified. There were 24 IBTR (4.8%), 35 LRR (7%), 47 distant metastases (9.4%), and 37 breast cancer deaths (7.4%). The overall 5-year disease-free rates for the whole cohort were: IBTR 97.4%, LRR 95.6%, DDFS 92.9%, and breast cancer–specific death 96.3%. A significant difference was observed for survival between subtypes for LRR (P = .012), DDFS (P = .0035), and breast cancer–specific death (P = .0482), but not for IBTR (P = .346). Conclusion: The 5-year and 10-year survival rates varied according to molecular subtype. Although this approach provides additional information to predict time to IBTR, LRR, DDFS, and death from breast cancer, its predictive power is less than that of traditional pathologic indices. This information may be useful in discussing outcomes and planning management with patients after BCT.

24 June 2019 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJunli Deng
Junli Deng
XBXupeng Bai
Xupeng Bai
XFXiaojie Feng
Xiaojie Feng
JNJie Ni
Jie Ni
JBJulia Beretov
Julia Beretov
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li
Ovarian cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the female reproductive tract. Chemoresistance is a major challenge for current ovarian cancer therapy. However, the mechanism underlying epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) chemoresistance is not completely uncovered. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is an important intracellular pathway in regulating cell cycle, quiescence, and proliferation. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and its association with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell (CSC) marker expression in EOC chemoresistance. The expressions of EMT and CSC markers were detected by immunofluorescence, western blot, and quantitative real-time PCR. BEZ235, a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, was employed to investigate the role of PI3K/Akt/ mTOR signaling in regulating EMT and CSC marker expression. Students’ t test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test were used to compare the data from different groups. We found that EMT and CSC marker expression were significantly enhanced in chemoresistant EOC cells, which was accompanied by the activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. Compared with single cisplatin treatment, combined treatment with BEZ235 and cisplatin significantly disrupted the colony formation ability, induced higher ROS level and more apoptosis in chemoresistant EOC cells. Furthermore, the combination approach effectively inhibited PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, reversed EMT, and decreased CSC marker expression in chemoresistant EOC cells compared with cisplatin mono-treatment. Our results first demonstrate that EMT and enhanced CSC marker expression triggered by activated PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling are involved in the chemoresistance of EOC, and BEZ235 in combination with cisplatin might be a promising treatment option to reverse EOC chemoresistance.

1 December 2013 in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJie Ni
Jie Ni
PCPaul Cozzi
Paul Cozzi
JHJingli Hao
Jingli Hao
JBJulia Beretov
Julia Beretov
LCLei Chang
Lei Chang
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li

12 February 2014 in The Prostate
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JNJie Ni
Jie Ni
PCPaul J. Cozzi
Paul J. Cozzi
JHJing L. Hao
Jing L. Hao
JBJulia Beretov
Julia Beretov
LCLei Chang
Lei Chang
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li