GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA

Prof. Dr. GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA

Instituto Federal do Sudeste de Minas Gerais, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães ValenteDomingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
DQDaniel Marçal De Queiroz
Daniel Marçal De Queiroz
ACAndre Luiz de Freitas Coelho Coelho
Andre Luiz de Freitas Coelho Coelho
MCMarcelo Marques Costa
Marcelo Marques Costa
TGTony Grift
Tony Grift
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been used as an alternative to conventional and geostatistical methods in digital mapping of soil attributes. An advantage of ML algorithms is their flexibility to use various layers of information as covariates. However, ML algorithms come in many variations that can make their application by end users difficult. To fill this gap, a Smart-Map plugin, which complements Geographic Information System QGIS Version 3, was developed using modern artificial intelligence (AI) tools. To generate interpolated maps, Ordinary Kriging (OK) and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm were implemented. The SVM model can use vector and raster layers available in QGIS as covariates at the time of interpolation. Covariates in the SVM model were selected based on spatial correlation measured by Moran’s Index (I’Moran). To evaluate the performance of the Smart-Map plugin, a case study was conducted with data of soil attributes collected in an area of 75 ha, located in the central region of the state of Goiás, Brazil. Performance comparisons between OK and SVM were performed for sampling grids with 38, 75, and 112 sampled points. R2 and RMSE were used to evaluate the performance of the methods. SVM was found superior to OK in the prediction of soil chemical attributes at the three sample densities tested and was therefore recommended for prediction of soil attributes. In this case study, soil attributes with R2 values ranging from 0.05 to 0.83 and RMSE ranging from 0.07 to 12.01 were predicted by the methods tested.

1 December 2024 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães ValenteDomingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
GPGUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
DQDaniel Marçal De Queiroz
Daniel Marçal De Queiroz
RZRodrigo Sinaidi Zandonadi
Rodrigo Sinaidi Zandonadi
LALucas Rios Do Amaral
Lucas Rios Do Amaral
TGTony Grift
Tony Grift
Precision agriculture techniques contribute to optimizing the use of agricultural inputs, as they consider the spatial and temporal variability in the production factors. Prescription maps of limestone and fertilizers at variable rates (VRA) can be generated using various soil sampling techniques, such as point grid sampling, cell sampling, and management zone sampling. However, low-density grid sampling often fails to capture the spatial variability in soil properties, leading to inaccurate fertilizer recommendations. Sampling techniques by cells or management zones can generate maps of better quality and at lower costs than the sampling system by degree of points with low sampling density. Thus, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of different sampling techniques for mapping soil attributes in precision agriculture. For this purpose, the following sampling techniques were used: high-density point grid sampling method, low-density point grid sampling method, cell sampling method, management zone sampling method, and conventional method (considering the mean). Six areas located in the Brazilian states of Bahia, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Goias, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Sao Paulo were used. The Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) method was determined for each method using cross-validation. It was concluded that the cell method generated the lowest error, followed by the high-density point grid sampling method. Management zone sampling showed a lower error compared to the low-density point grid sampling method. By comparing different sampling techniques, we demonstrate that management zone and cell grid sampling can reduce soil sampling while maintaining comparable or superior accuracy in soil attribute mapping.

8 November 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães ValenteDomingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
Domingos Sarvio Magalhães Valente
DQDaniel Marçal De Queiroz
Daniel Marçal De Queiroz
GPGUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA

8 November 2023
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
GPGUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
GUSTAVO WILLAM PEREIRA
DVDomingos Sárvio Magalhaes Valente
Domingos Sárvio Magalhaes Valente
DQDaniel Marçal de Queiroz
Daniel Marçal de Queiroz
ACAndré Luiz de Freitas Coelho
André Luiz de Freitas Coelho
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been used as an alternative to conventional and geostatistical methods in the digital mapping of soil attributes. However, ML algorithms have many variants that can make their application difficult for end users. To fill this gap, the objective of this work was to develop the Smart-Map plugin, to be used in QGIS. The Ordinary Kriging (OK) geostatistical method and the ML Support Vector Machine (SVM) model were implemented in the plugin to generate interpolated maps based on machine learning and OK. Performance comparisons between OK and SVM were performed for sample grids with 112 sampled points. Algoritmos de Aprendizado de Máquina (ML) têm sido utilizados como alternativa aos métodos convencionais e geoestatísticos no mapeamento digital de atributos do solo. No entanto, os algoritmos de ML apresentam muitas variantes que podem dificultar a sua aplicação por usuários finais. Para preencher essa lacuna, o objetivo desse trabalho foi desenvolver o plugin Smart-Map, para ser utilizado no QGIS. Foram implementados no plugin o método geoestatístico Krigagem Ordinária (OK) e o modelo de ML Support Vector Machine (SVM), para geração de mapas interpolados com base em aprendizado de máquina e OK. Comparações de performance entre OK e SVM foram realizadas em um grid amostral com 112 pontos amostrados.