In the rapidly evolving field of interventional oncology, minimally invasive methods, including CT-guided cryoablation, play an increasingly important role in tumor treatment, notably in bone and soft tissue cancers. Cryoablation works using compressed gas-filled probes to freeze tumor cells to temperatures below −20 °C, exploiting the Joule–Thompson effect. This cooling causes cell destruction by forming intracellular ice crystals and disrupting blood flow through endothelial cell damage, leading to local ischemia and devascularization. Coupling this with CT technology enables precise tumor targeting, preserving healthy surrounding tissues and decreasing postoperative complications. This review reports the most important literature on CT-guided cryoablation’s application in musculoskeletal oncology, including sarcoma, bone metastases, and bone and soft tissue benign primary tumors, reporting on the success rate, recurrence rate, complications, and technical aspects to maximize success for cryoablation in the musculoskeletal system.

(1) Background: This retrospective study aimed to analyze the history and treatment outcomes of localized, high-grade MLS of the extremities. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with primary high-grade MLS of the extremities. OS, LRFS, MFS, PRS, and DFS were analyzed. (3) Results: Five-year OS and LRS were 96% (95% CI: 86–98) and 94% (95% CI: 85–98), respectively. Statistical analysis indicated no risk factors for OS and LFRS. MFS was 77% (65–85) at 5-year follow-up. Size (p = 0.0337) was the only risk factor statistically significant for MFS (HR = 0.248, 95% CI: 0.07–0.84). Median PRS after distant metastasis was 34 months (range: 1–127 months). Five-year PRS was 79% (48–93). Overall, the 5-year DFS was 76% (65–85). (4) Conclusions: Patients with MLS were found to have a good prognosis. In high-grade deep-seated tumors, common risk factors for MLS do not correlate with survival. Tumor size appears to be the only predictor of long-term DSF and MSF.

(1) Background: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is one of the most common benign bone tumors. This type of osteogenic tumor is generally characterized by a well-defined lytic area with a vascularized central nidus surrounded by sclerosis and bone thickening. The wrist and hand bones are infrequent sites for osteoid osteoma: only 10% of the cases arise in these areas. Standard treatments are surgical excision and radio-frequency ablation (RFA), both with advantages and disadvantages. This study aimed to compare the two techniques to prove if RFA could be a potential alternative to surgery in the treatment of OO of the hand. (2) Methods: Patients treated for OO of the hand between January 2011 and December 2020 were evaluated and data was collected regarding the lesions’ characteristics and the treatment outcome. Each patient was followed up for 24 months and VAS pain (Visual Analogue Scale), DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and PRWE (Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation) scores were collected. (3) Results: A total of 27 patients were included in the study: 19 surgical and 8 RFA. Both treatments showed a significant improvement in pain and functionality. Surgery was associated with a higher complication rate (stiffness and pain), while RFA was associated with a higher recurrence rate (2/8 patients). RFA allowed for a speedier return to work. (4) Conclusions: We believe that osteoid osteoma treatment with RFA in the hand should be an available alternative to surgery as it allows rapid pain relief and a swift return to work. Surgery should be reserved for cases of diagnostic uncertainty or periosteal localization.

The aim of our study is to report our experience on CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for osteoid osteoma (OO) in children under 4 years of age and to review the literature regarding this atypical, early onset of the disease. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of the patients treated with CT-guided RFA for OO at our institution (2006–2021), including those under 4 years of age. Data regarding technical success, clinical success, and biopsy diagnostic yield were collected. Moreover, we performed a literature review including previous articles on early-onset OO. We found only 12 patients that were under 4 years of age (12/842–1.4%) at the time of RFA treatment: 4 F and 8 M, mean age at the time of the treatment 35.3 months (range 22–46 months). The mean follow-up was 22.8 months (range 6–96 months). Technical success was achieved in all cases (12/12). In all patients (12/12), a complete remission of the pain symptoms was achieved at clinical follow-up controls. No recurrence of pain or complications were documented. The histopathological diagnosis was confirmed in 4 patients (4/12–33.3%). Moreover, we found another 9 articles in the literature with a main focus on early-onset OO (<4 years old), with a total of 12 patients included; 6 of those patients (6/12–50%) were treated with CT-guided RFA, with success reported 5 cases (5/6–83.3%). Our series of cases treated at a single institution, together with the existing data from the literature, confirms that CT-guided RFA is effective and safe for the treatment of osteoid osteoma, even in atypical, early onset in children under 4 years of age.

Brachial plexus injuries are commonly diagnosed clinically, as conventional imaging has a low sensitivity. In recent years, diffusion tensor imaging has established a clinical role in the study of the central nervous system and, while still presenting some limitations due to the technical complexity of the acquisition method, is showing promising results when applied to peripheral nerves. Moreover, deterministic fiber tracking with the Euler’s method and multishell acquisition are two novel advances in the field which contribute to enhancing the reliability of the technique reducing the respiratory and inhomogeneity artifacts in this “magnetically complex” region, and better isolating the fibers in a heterogeneous territory. Here, we report a case of brachial plexus traumatic injury, a healthy reference subject, and details on the acquisition protocol of the reconstruction algorithm.

Background: Adamantinoma is a very rare primary malignant bone tumor. A histopathological grading is still lacking, and as a result, metastatic risk stratification at diagnosis is challenging. Due to this, imaging could play a role in prognosis prediction and treatment strategy assessment. We aimed to evaluate baseline imaging features and their correlation with the development of metastatic disease. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical (metastatic disease) and radiological data at baseline (Conventional Radiography, CT, MRI) of all consecutive patients with a histopathological diagnosis of adamantinoma at our sarcoma center between 2006 and 2022. Tumor location, dimensions, main radiological pattern (lytic, sclerotic, mixed), Lodwick–Madewell grading, periosteal reaction, multifocality, soft-tissue extraskeletal component, peritumoral edema, peritumoral enhancement, and vascular invasion were analyzed. Associations between the above-mentioned radiological features and metastatic disease at diagnosis or during follow-up were assessed. Results: Twenty-two patients were included (15 [68.2%] women, median age 27 years old, range 7–58 years old). Six out of twenty-two patients (27.3%) developed distant metastases (only two of them were dedifferentiated adamantinoma): two patients (9%) presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis, while four patients developed metastases during follow-up (18.2%). The following radiological features represent a significant risk for metastatic disease (p = 0.01): (i) presence of an extra-skeletal component (Odds Ratio [OR] = 75.40; 95% CI = 3.15–1802.71), (ii) vascular invasion (OR = 121.00; 95% CI = 4.28–3424.73), (iii) diffuse peritumoral edema (OR = 75.40; 95% CI = 3.15–1802.71), (iv) peritumoral enhancement (OR = 84.33; 95% CI = 2.93–2423.26). All other features analyzed were not significantly associated with the onset of distant metastases. Based on these above-mentioned MRI features, we built two risk models for metastatic disease (excluding peritumoral enhancement, which was not available in five patients, to be applicable on unenhanced MRIs): Model (A) = simultaneous presence of two of those three features (2/3) with a sensitivity of 100% (54.07–100%) and a specificity of 93.75% (69.67–99.84%). Model (B) = simultaneous presence of all three features (3/3) with a sensitivity of 83.33% (35.88–99.58%) and a specificity of 100% (74.1–100%). Conclusions: An accurate evaluation of baseline imaging studies (particularly MRI) in patients affected by adamantinoma may significantly aid in prognosis prediction and the selection of high-metastatic-risk patients. For these patients, strict follow-up controls and more aggressive treatments should be suggested after multidisciplinary discussions in sarcoma centers.