Thomas A. Schlacher

Prof. Thomas A. Schlacher

The Animal Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast,90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ODOmar Defeo
Omar Defeo
AMAnton McLachlan
Anton McLachlan
DSDavid S. Schoeman
David S. Schoeman
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
JDJenifer Dugan
Jenifer Dugan
FSFelicita Scapini
Felicita Scapini

1 January 2010 in Annual Review of Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMalcolm R. Clark
Malcolm R. Clark
ARAshley Alun Rowden
Ashley Alun Rowden
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
AWAlan Williams
Alan Williams
MCMireille Consalvey
Mireille Consalvey
JHJason Hall-Spencer
Jason Hall-Spencer
In this review of seamount ecology, we address a number of key scientific issues concerning the structure and function of benthic communities, human impacts, and seamount management and conservation. We consider whether community composition and diversity differ between seamounts and continental slopes, how important dispersal capabilities are in seamount connectivity, what environmental factors drive species composition and diversity, whether seamounts are centers of enhanced biological productivity, and whether they have unique trophic architecture. We discuss how vulnerable seamount communities are to fishing and mining, and how we can balance exploitation of resources and conservation of habitat. Despite considerable advances in recent years, there remain many questions about seamount ecosystems that need closer integration of molecular, oceanographic, and ecological research.

10 August 2015 in ICES Journal of Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMalcolm R. Clark
Malcolm R. Clark
FAFranziska Althaus
Franziska Althaus
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
AWAlan Williams
Alan Williams
DBDavid A. Bowden
David A. Bowden
ARAshley Alun Rowden
Ashley Alun Rowden
Deep-sea fisheries operate globally throughout the world's oceans, chiefly targeting stocks on the upper and mid-continental slope and offshore seamounts. Major commercial fisheries occur, or have occurred, for species such as orange roughy, oreos, cardinalfish, grenadiers and alfonsino. Few deep fisheries have, however, been sustainable, with most deep-sea stocks having undergone rapid and substantial declines. Fishing in the deep sea not only harvests target species but can also cause unintended environmental harm, mostly from operating heavy bottom trawls and, to a lesser extent, bottom longlines. Bottom trawling over hard seabed (common on seamounts) routinely removes most of the benthic fauna, resulting in declines in faunal biodiversity, cover and abundance. Functionally, these impacts translate into loss of biogenic habitat from potentially large areas. Recent studies on longline fisheries show that their impact is much less than from trawl gear, but can still be significant. Benthic taxa, especially the dominant mega-faunal components of deep-sea systems such as corals and sponges, can be highly vulnerable to fishing impacts. Some taxa have natural resilience due to their size, shape, and structure, and some can survive in natural refuges inaccessible to trawls. However, many deep-sea invertebrates are exceptionally long-lived and grow extremely slowly: these biological attributes mean that the recovery capacity of the benthos is highly limited and prolonged, predicted to take decades to centuries after fishing has ceased. The low tolerance and protracted recovery of many deep-sea benthic communities has implications for managing environmental performance of deep-sea fisheries, including that (i) expectations for recovery and restoration of impacted areas may be unrealistic in acceptable time frames, (ii) the high vulnerability of deep-sea fauna makes spatial management—that includes strong and consistent conservation closures—an important priority, and (iii) biodiversity conservation should be > balanced with options for open areas that support sustainable fisheries.

3 June 2008 in Marine Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
DSDave S. Schoeman
Dave S. Schoeman
JDJenifer Dugan
Jenifer Dugan
MLMariano Lastra
Mariano Lastra
AJAlan Jones
Alan Jones
AMAnton McLachlan
Anton McLachlan

14 May 2007 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
JDJenifer Dugan
Jenifer Dugan
DSDave S. Schoeman
Dave S. Schoeman
MLMariano Lastra
Mariano Lastra
AJAlan Jones
Alan Jones
ODOmar Defeo
Omar Defeo
Sandy beaches line most of the world's oceans and are highly valued by society: more people use sandy beaches than any other type of shore. While the economic and social values of beaches are generally regarded as paramount, sandy shores also have special ecological features and contain a distinctive biodiversity that is generally not recognized. These unique ecosystems are facing escalating anthropogenic pressures, chiefly from rapacious coastal development, direct human uses — mainly associated with recreation — and rising sea levels. Beaches are increasingly becoming trapped in a ‘coastal squeeze’ between burgeoning human populations from the land and the effects of global climate change from the sea. Society's interventions (e.g. shoreline armouring, beach nourishment) to combat changes in beach environments, such as erosion and shoreline retreat, can result in severe ecological impacts and loss of biodiversity at local scales, but are predicted also to have cumulative large‐scale consequences worldwide. Because of the scale of this problem, the continued existence of beaches as functional ecosystems is likely to depend on direct conservation efforts. Conservation, in turn, will have to increasingly draw on a consolidated body of ecological theory for these ecosystems. Although this body of theory has yet to be fully developed, we identify here a number of critical research directions that are required to progress coastal management and conservation of sandy beach ecosystems.

17 December 2009 in Marine Ecology Progress Series
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAF Althaus
F Althaus
AWA Williams
A Williams
Thomas A. SchlacherThomas A. Schlacher
Thomas A. Schlacher
RKRj Kloser
Rj Kloser
MGMa Green
Ma Green
MHMa Hoenlinger-Schlacher
Ma Hoenlinger-Schlacher
Complex biogenic habitats formed by corals are important components of the megabenthos of seamounts, but their fragility makes them susceptible to damage by bottom trawling. Here we examine changes to stony corals and associated megabenthic assemblages on seamounts off Tasmania (Australia) with different histories of bottom-contact trawling by analysing 64 504 video frames (25 seamounts) and 704 high-resolution images (7 seamounts). Trawling had a dramatic impact on the seamount benthos: (1) bottom cover of the matrix-forming stony coral Solenosmilia variabilis was reduced by 2 orders of magnitude; (2) loss of coral habitat translated into 3-fold declines in richness, diversity and density of other megabenthos; and (3) megabenthos assemblage structures diverged widely between trawled and untrawled seamounts. On seamounts where trawling had been reduced to less than 5% a decade ago and ceased completely 5 yr ago, there was no clear signal of recovery of the megabenthos; communities remained impoverished comprising fewer species at reduced densities. Differences in community structure in the trawled (as compared to the untrawled) seamounts were attributed to resistant species that survived initial impacts, others protected in natural refugia and early colonisers. Long-term persistence of trawling impacts on deep-water corals is consistent with their biological traits (e.g. slow growth rates, fragility) that make them particularly vulnerable. Because recovery on seamounts will be slow, the benefits from fishery closures may not be immediately recognisable or measureable. Spatial closures are crucial conservation instruments, but will require long-term commitments and expectations of performance whose time frames match the biological tempo in the deep sea