The traditional single electromechanical conversion energy harvester can collect energy only in a single vibration direction. Moreover, it requires high environmental vibration frequency, and its output power is low. To solve these problems, a cross-shaped magnetically coupled piezoelectric–electromagnetic hybrid harvester is proposed. The harvester comprised a ring-shaped support frame, a piezoelectric generation structure, and an electromagnetic generation structure. The harvester could simultaneously generate energy piezoelectrically and electrically, in addition, it could generate electricity efficiently at a lower environmental vibration, and it can collect the energy in two vibration directions simultaneously. To verify the effectiveness of the device, we set up a vibration experiment system and conducted comparative experiments about non-magnetically coupled piezoelectric, magnetically coupled piezoelectric, and magnetically coupled piezoelectric–electromagnetic hybrid energy harvesters. The experimental results showed that the output power of the magnetically coupled piezoelectric–electromagnetic hybrid energy harvester was 2.13 mW for the piezoelectric structure and 1.76 mW for the electromagnetic structure under the vibration of single-direction resonant frequency. The total hybrid output power was 3.89 mW. The hybrid harvester could collect vibration energy parallel to the ring in any direction. Furthermore, compared with the non-magnetically coupled piezoelectric energy harvester and the magnetically coupled piezoelectric energy harvester, the output power was increased by 141.6% and 55.6%, respectively.

In nature, birds can freely observe and rest on the surface of objects such as tree branches, mainly due to their flexible claws, thus this paper is inspired by bird perching and shows two imitation bird claw perching grasping mechanisms in the shape of “three in front and one at the back”. One is articulated, the other is resilient, the difference being that the former has a pin-articulated claw structure and uses a double fishing line to perform the grasping and resetting action, while the latter uses a resilient linking piece, a single fishing line and resilient linking piece to perform the grasping and resetting action. To verify the grasping effect, experiments were designed to grasp objects of different shapes and maximum grasping weight load. The results show that the two types of perching grasping mechanism can reach a large degree of toe bending, have good passive bending deformation ability, can grasp different types of objects, including the articulated type has a stronger deformation ability, and can grasp branches with a diameter in the range of 12.5–55.8 mm. The elastic reset type is smoother than the articulated type toe bending curve, and the maximum graspable object weight is about three times the overall weight of the grasping mechanism. The maximum gripping weight is about three times the overall weight of the gripping mechanism and the load capacity is about two times that of the articulated type.