Arif Khan

Dr. Arif Khan

Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in Information and Software Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan
JKJacky Keung
Jacky Keung
MNMahmood Niazi
Mahmood Niazi
SHShahid Hussain
Shahid Hussain
AAAwais Ahmad
Awais Ahmad

1 October 2019 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan
Mohammad ShameemMohammad Shameem
Mohammad Shameem
RKRakesh Ranjan Kumar
Rakesh Ranjan Kumar
SHShahid Hussain
Shahid Hussain
XYXuefeng Yan
Xuefeng Yan

10 March 2023 in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan
MAMuhammad Azeem Akbar
Muhammad Azeem Akbar
MFMahdi Fahmideh
Mahdi Fahmideh
PLPeng Liang
Peng Liang
MWMuhammad Waseem
Muhammad Waseem
Pekka AbrahamssonPekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson
Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and technologies are being increasingly adopted in smart systems contexts; however, such technologies are concerned with ethical uncertainties. Various guidelines, principles, and regulatory frameworks are designed to ensure that AI technologies adhere to ethical well-being. However, the implications of AI ethics principles and guidelines are still being debated. To further explore the significance of AI ethics principles and relevant challenges, we conducted a survey of 99 randomly selected representative AI practitioners and lawmakers (e.g., AI engineers and lawyers) from 20 countries across five continents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first empirical study that unveils the perceptions of two different types of population (AI practitioners and lawmakers) and the study findings confirm that transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles. On the other hand, lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are found to be the most common AI ethics challenges. The impact analysis of the challenges across principles reveals that conflict in practice is a highly severe challenge. Moreover, the perceptions of practitioners and lawmakers are statistically correlated with significant differences for particular principles (e.g. fairness and freedom) and challenges (e.g. lacking monitoring bodies and machine distortion). Our findings stimulate further research, particularly empowering existing capability maturity models to support ethics-aware AI systems’ development and quality assessment.

23 March 2023 in Journal of Systems and Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan
AAAakash Ahmad
Aakash Ahmad
MWMuhammad Waseem
Muhammad Waseem
PLPeng Liang
Peng Liang
MFMahdi Fahmideh
Mahdi Fahmideh
PAPekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson

1 April 2019 in Journal of Computer Languages
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMuhammad Azeem Akbar
Muhammad Azeem Akbar
JSJun Sang
Jun Sang
NANasrullah
Nasrullah
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan
SMSajjad Mahmood
Sajjad Mahmood
HXHong Xiang
Hong Xiang

16 July 2018 in Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mohammad ShameemMohammad Shameem
Mohammad Shameem
RKRakesh Ranjan Kumar
Rakesh Ranjan Kumar
CKChiranjeev Kumar
Chiranjeev Kumar
BCBibhas Chandra
Bibhas Chandra
Arif KhanArif Khan
Arif Khan