Yen Fu-Shun

Dr. Yen Fu-Shun

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2021 in Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJun-Sing Wang
Jun-Sing Wang
YFYen Fu-Shun
Yen Fu-Shun
KLKun-Der Lin
Kun-Der Lin
SSShyi-Jang Shin
Shyi-Jang Shin
YHYueh-Han Hsu
Yueh-Han Hsu
D(Diabetes Kidney Disease Research Committee of the Diabetes Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
Diabetes Kidney Disease Research Committee of the Diabetes Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan)
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a critical microvascular complication of diabetes. With the continuous increase in the prevalence of diabetes since 2000, the prevalence of DKD has also been increasing in past years. The prevalence of DKD among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan increased from 13.32% in 2000 to 17.92% in 2014. The cumulative incidence of DKD among individuals with type 1 diabetes in Taiwan was higher than 30% during 1999–2012. DKD is the leading cause of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD), with a prevalence of approximately 45% in a population on chronic dialysis in Taiwan. Among individuals with type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of ESRD in the receipt of dialysis also increased from 1.32% in 2005 to 1.47% in 2014. Risk factors for DKD development are age, race, family history, hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, dietary patterns, and lifestyles. Prognostic factors that aggravate DKD progression include age, family history, sex, glycemic control, blood pressure (BP), microvascular complications, and atherosclerosis. This review summarizes updated information on the onset and progression of DKD, particularly in the Taiwanese population. Translating these epidemiological features is essential to optimizing the kidney care and improving the prognosis of DKD in Asian populations.

4 October 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYen Fu-Shun
Yen Fu-Shun
WCWeishan Chen
Weishan Chen
CHENGCHUNG WEICHENGCHUNG WEI
CHENGCHUNG WEI
CHChih-Cheng Hsu
Chih-Cheng Hsu
CHChii-Min Hwu
Chii-Min Hwu
Few studies have investigated the therapeutic effects of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared the risk of all-cause mortality between metformin users and nonusers. We conducted a retrospective cohort study for patients with T2DM and COPD who were enrolled between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2012. Individuals with exacerbated symptoms who were hospitalized or sent to the emergency department (ED) were identified as having exacerbated COPD; outpatient claims were identified as having stable COPD. A total of 40,597 metformin users and 39,529 nonusers comprised the cohort of stable COPD; 14,001 metformin users and 21,613 nonusers comprised the cohort of exacerbated COPD. Users and nonusers were matched using propensity score (1:1). Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A total of 19,505 metformin users were matched to 19,505 nonusers in the cohort of diabetes with stable COPD. The mean follow-up time was 3.91 years. All-cause mortality was reported in 1326 and 1609 metformin users and nonusers, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, metformin users had lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.84, p < 0.0001). Metformin users had significantly lower risk of noncardiovascular death (aHR = 0.86, p = 0.0008). A total of 7721 metformin users were matched to 7721 nonusers in the cohort of diabetes with exacerbated COPD. The mean follow-up time was 3.18 years. All-cause mortality was reported in 1567 and 1865 metformin users and nonusers, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, metformin users had significantly lower risk of mortality (aHR = 0.89, p = 0.002) and cardiovascular death (aHR = 0.70, p = 0.01). This large-series, nationwide cohort study demonstrated that metformin use could significantly lower the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM and either stable or exacerbated COPD.

1 August 1995 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YFYen Fu-Shun
Yen Fu-Shun
JWJaw‐Chung Wu
Jaw‐Chung Wu
CLChung‐Ru Lai
Chung‐Ru Lai
WSWen‐Yang Sheng
Wen‐Yang Sheng
BKBenjamin Ing‐Tiau Kuo
Benjamin Ing‐Tiau Kuo
SLShou‐Dong Lee
Shou‐Dong Lee

2 August 2018 in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PHPai-Feng Hsu
Pai-Feng Hsu
SSShih-Hsien Sung
Shih-Hsien Sung
HCHao-Min Cheng
Hao-Min Cheng
SSShyi-Jang Shin
Shyi-Jang Shin
KLKun-Der Lin
Kun-Der Lin
CHChih-Cheng Hsu
Chih-Cheng Hsu
Context Althoughα-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) has been shown to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), the cardiovascular benefits of AGI in type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. Objective We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of adding acarbose versus sulfonylureas to metformin therapy in T2D patients. Design, Setting, and Participants The study population was drawn from the database of the Diabetes Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Program in Taiwan. Sulfonylureas and acarbose were respectively prescribed to 196,143 and 14,306 T2D patients during 2004-2015, who had been treated with metformin. A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted. Patients were followed for clinical adverse events of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations of major atherosclerotic events (myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke), heart failure or hypoglycemia. Results A total of 14,306 propensity score-matched pairs (55.8±13.1 years, 47.8% men) were enrolled in this analysis. Compared with sulfonylureas as the add-on therapy to metformin, the use of acarbose was associated with significantly lower risks of hospitalizations for major atherosclerotic events (hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals: 0.69, 0.52-0.91), ischemic stroke (0.68, 0.49-0.94), and hypoglycemia (0.23, 0.08-0.71), after accounting for major confounding factors. Conclusions In T2D treatment, use of acarbose as the add-on remedy to metformin was associated with lower risks of major atherosclerotic events, ischemic stroke, and hypoglycemia, compared with sulfonylurea.


24 June 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YFYen Fu-Shun
Yen Fu-Shun
JWJames Cheng-Chung Wei
James Cheng-Chung Wei
YYYu-Cih Yang
Yu-Cih Yang
CHChih-Cheng Hsu
Chih-Cheng Hsu
CHChii-Min Hwu
Chii-Min Hwu
Few studies investigated the respiratory outcomes of metformin use in patients with coexistent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We want to compare the long-term respiratory endpoints of metformin use and nonuse in patients with T2DM and COPD. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with T2DM and COPD from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Program between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Main outcomes were hospitalized bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and lung cancer. In total, 20,644 propensity score-matched metformin users and nonusers were assessed. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of metformin use relative to nonuse for bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, NIPPV, IMV, and lung cancer were 1.17 (1.11–1.23), 1.34 (1.26–1.43), 0.99 (0.89–1.10), 1.10 (1.03–1.17), and 1.12 (0.96–1.30). Metformin use also exhibited significant dose–response relationship with respect to the risks of bacterial pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD and IMV. Consistent results were found in the sensitivity test. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that in patients with T2DM and COPD, metformin use was associated with higher risks of pneumonia, hospitalization for COPD, and IMV. If patients with COPD use metformin, vigilance with regard to their pulmonary condition may be required.