Ola Söderberg

Prof. Ola Söderberg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2006 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOla Söderberg
Ola Söderberg
MGMats Gullberg
Mats Gullberg
MJMalin Jarvius
Malin Jarvius
KRKarin Ridderstråle
Karin Ridderstråle
KLKarl-Johan Leuchowius
Karl-Johan Leuchowius
ULUlf Landegren
Ulf Landegren

1 July 2008 in Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOla Söderberg
Ola Söderberg
KLKarl-Johan Leuchowius
Karl-Johan Leuchowius
MGMats Gullberg
Mats Gullberg
MJMalin Jarvius
Malin Jarvius
IWIrene Weibrecht
Irene Weibrecht
ULUlf Landegren
Ulf Landegren

20 February 2005 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAzadeh Arabi
Azadeh Arabi
SWSiqin Wu
Siqin Wu
KRKarin Ridderstråle
Karin Ridderstråle
HBHolger Bierhoff
Holger Bierhoff
CSChiounan Shiue
Chiounan Shiue
AWAnthony Wright
Anthony Wright

11 April 2010 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChatarina Larsson
Chatarina Larsson
IGIda Grundberg
Ida Grundberg
OSOla Söderberg
Ola Söderberg
MNMats Nilsson
Mats Nilsson

1 May 2003 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNatalie von der Lehr
Natalie von der Lehr
SJSara Johansson
Sara Johansson
SWSiqin Wu
Siqin Wu
FBFuad Bahram
Fuad Bahram
ACAlina Castell
Alina Castell
LLLars-Gunnar Larsson
Lars-Gunnar Larsson

1 June 2010 in Expert Review of Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IWIrene Weibrecht
Irene Weibrecht
KLKarl-Johan Leuchowius
Karl-Johan Leuchowius
CCCarl-Magnus Clausson
Carl-Magnus Clausson
TCTim Conze
Tim Conze
MJMalin Jarvius
Malin Jarvius
OSOla Söderberg
Ola Söderberg
An essential skill for every researcher is to learn how to select and apply the most appropriate methods for the questions they are trying to answer. With the extensive variety of methods available, it is increasingly important to scrutinize the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques prior to making a decision on which to use. In this article, we describe an approach to evaluate methods by reducing them into subcomponents. This is exemplified by a brief description of some commonly used proteomics methods. The same approach can also be used in method development by rearranging subcomponents in order to create new methods, as demonstrated with the development of proximity ligation assays (PLAs). PLA is a method as designed in our laboratory for detection of proteins, protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications. Fundamentally, protein-recognition events are converted into detectable DNA molecules. The technique uses protein-DNA conjugates as binders for the targets of interest. Binding of two or more conjugates to the target results in assembly of an assay-specific DNA molecule. Subsequent amplification of the DNA molecule generates a signal that can be detected using PCR, for detection of minute amounts of proteins in serum, or standard fluorescence microscopy for detection of protein-protein interactions in tissue sections. Lastly, we apply the approach of recombining subcomponents to develop a few novel hypothetical methods hoping this might stimulate the readers to utilize this approach themselves.