Jan Van Elslande

Dr. Jan Van Elslande

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Journal of Clinical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJan Van Elslande
Jan Van Elslande
MOMatthijs Oyaert
Matthijs Oyaert
SAScott Ailliet
Scott Ailliet
MRMarc Van Ranst
Marc Van Ranst
NLNatalie Lorent
Natalie Lorent
PVPieter Vermeersch
Pieter Vermeersch

12 February 2022 in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJan Van Elslande
Jan Van Elslande
MOMatthijs Oyaert
Matthijs Oyaert
NLNatalie Lorent
Natalie Lorent
YWYannick Vande Weygaerde
Yannick Vande Weygaerde
GPGijs Van Pottelbergh
Gijs Van Pottelbergh
PVPieter Vermeersch
Pieter Vermeersch

16 January 2022 in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJan Van Elslande
Jan Van Elslande
MWMatthias Weemaes
Matthias Weemaes
Lode GodderisLode Godderis
Lode Godderis
GPGijs Van Pottelbergh
Gijs Van Pottelbergh
XBXavier Bossuyt
Xavier Bossuyt
PVPieter Vermeersch
Pieter Vermeersch

31 December 2022 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSophie Missault
Sophie Missault
AMAnne De Meyst
Anne De Meyst
JEJan Van Elslande
Jan Van Elslande
AAAnne-Marie V. Van den Abeele
Anne-Marie V. Van den Abeele
ESElke Steen
Elke Steen
DVDaisy Vanrompay
Daisy Vanrompay
Chlamydia psittaci is an established zoonotic agent causing respiratory disease in humans. An infection often remains asymptomatic but can also result in flu-like illness, pneumonia or even multi-organ failure. This paper describes three patients, hospitalised at AZ Sint-Lucas Hospital, with atypical pneumonia who were diagnosed with C. psittaci after an in-depth anamnesis and laboratory investigation in the midst of the COVID pandemic. All three infections were confirmed with PCR and serology, whereas viable bacteria were only present for one patient. Genotyping revealed the presence of genotype B for patient 1 and 2 whereas ompA genotyping was unsuccessful for patient 3. This case report demonstrates the importance of a thorough patient history as close contact with birds is one of the main risk factors to contract the pathogen. Once exposure to birds has been confirmed, a diagnosis by a combination of PCR and serology is essential in order to initiate a treatment with the proper antibiotics. As psittacosis is still an underestimated and underdiagnosed disease, communication between laboratory, clinicians and bird fanciers is encouraged.

18 October 2020 in Acta Clinica Belgica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFrank Buntinx
Frank Buntinx
PCPeter Claes
Peter Claes
MGMarjo Gulikers
Marjo Gulikers
Jan VerbakelJan Verbakel
Jan Verbakel
DJDe Lepeleire Jan
De Lepeleire Jan
PVPieter Vermeersch
Pieter Vermeersch
To examine the added value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in a nursing home during an acute COVID-19 outbreak. RT-PCR is the gold standard, but can be false-negative. 119 residents and 93 staff members were tested with RT-PCR test and/or a rapid IgM/IgG test. Of these participants, 176 had both tests, 24 only RT-PCR, and 12 only IgM/IgG in the period April 14 to 16 April 2020. 40 (34%) residents and 11 (13%) staff were PCR-positive. Using a rapid IgM/IgG test, 17 (17%) residents and 18 (20%) staff were positive for IgM and/or IgG (IgM/IgG). Thirty-two PCR-positive residents had an IgM/IgG test: 9 (28%), 11 (34%), and 13 (41%) were positive for IgM, IgG, and IgM/IgG. Ten PCR-positive staff had an IgM/IgG test: 3 (30%), 6 (60%), and 6 (60%) were positive for IgM, IgG, and IgM/IgG. Additional IgM/IgG tests were performed in 9 residents 11 to 14 days after the positive RT-PCR test. Of those, 7 (78%) tested positive for IgM/IgG. When retested 3 weeks later, the 2 remaining residents also tested positive. Of the 134 PCR-negative participants who had an IgM/IgG test, 15 were positive for IgM/IgG (8% of the 200 participants tested with RT-PCR). During an acute outbreak in a nursing home, 26% of residents and staff were PCR-positive. An additional 8% was diagnosed using IgM/IgG antibody testing. The use of RT-PCR alone as the sole diagnostic method for surveillance during an acute outbreak is insufficient to grab the full extent of the outbreak.

31 May 2022 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJan Van Elslande
Jan Van Elslande
FKFemke Kerckhofs
Femke Kerckhofs
LCLize Cuypers
Lize Cuypers
EWElke Wollants
Elke Wollants
BPBarney Potter
Barney Potter
JDJonathan Degosserie
Jonathan Degosserie
We report two clusters of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta variant) infections in a group of 41 Indian nursing students who travelled from New Delhi, India, to Belgium via Paris, France. All students tested negative before departure and had a second negative antigen test upon arrival in Paris. Upon arrival in Belgium, the students were quarantined in eight different houses. Four houses remained COVID-free during the 24 days of follow-up, while all 27 residents of the other four houses developed an infection during quarantine, including the four residents who were fully vaccinated and the two residents who were partially vaccinated. Genome sequencing revealed two distinct clusters affecting one and three houses, respectively. In this group of students, vaccination status did not seem to prevent infection nor decrease the viral load. No severe symptoms were reported. Extensive contact tracing and 3 months of nationwide genomic surveillance confirmed that these outbreaks were successfully contained and did not contribute to secondary community transmission in Belgium. These clusters highlight the importance of repeated testing and quarantine measures among travelers coming from countries experiencing a surge of infections, as all infections were detected 6 days or more after arrival.