Adam Abu Abeid

Dr. Adam Abu Abeid

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2024 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XZXiao-Dong Zhou
Xiao-Dong Zhou
QCQin-Fen Chen
Qin-Fen Chen
WYWah Yang
Wah Yang
MZMauricio Zuluaga
Mauricio Zuluaga
GTGiovanni Targher
Giovanni Targher
MZMing-Hua Zheng
Ming-Hua Zheng
Obesity represents a major global health challenge with important clinical implications. Despite its recognized importance, the global disease burden attributable to high body mass index (BMI) remains less well understood. We systematically analyzed global deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributable to high BMI using the methodology and analytical approaches of the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. High BMI was defined as a BMI over 25 kg/m2 for individuals aged ≥20 years. The Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) was used as a composite measure to assess the level of socio-economic development across different regions. Subgroup analyses considered age, sex, year, geographical location, and SDI. From 1990 to 2021, the global deaths and DALYs attributable to high BMI increased more than 2.5-fold for females and males. However, the age-standardized death rates remained stable for females and increased by 15.0% for males. Similarly, the age-standardized DALY rates increased by 21.7% for females and 31.2% for males. In 2021, the six leading causes of high BMI-attributable DALYs were diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease, low back pain and stroke. From 1990 to 2021, low-middle SDI countries exhibited the highest annual percentage changes in age-standardized DALY rates, whereas high SDI countries showed the lowest. The worldwide health burden attributable to high BMI has grown significantly between 1990 and 2021. The increasing global rates of high BMI and the associated disease burden highlight the urgent need for regular surveillance and monitoring of BMI. 10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key R&D Program of China.

13 August 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMario Musella
Mario Musella
GBGiovanna Berardi
Giovanna Berardi
Antonio VitielloAntonio Vitiello
Antonio Vitiello
DDDanit Dayan
Danit Dayan
VSVincenzo Schiavone
Vincenzo Schiavone
Adam Abu AbeidAdam Abu Abeid
Adam Abu Abeid
Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. Vitamin D deficiency is a common complication encountered both during preoperative workup and follow-up. Aim: To estimate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients undergoing MBS. Methods: Prospectively maintained database of our university MBS center was searched to assess the rate of preoperative and postoperative vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in patients undergoing MBS over a one-year period. Results: In total, 184 patients were included, 85 cases of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), 99 Gastric Bypass (GB; 91 One Anastomosis and 8 Roux-en-Y). Preoperative vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were respectively found in 61% and 29% of patients, with no significant difference between SG and GB. After six months, 15% of patients had vitamin D deficiency, and 34% had vitamin D insufficiency. There was no significant difference in the rate of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency and the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) at 1, 3, and 6 postoperative months between SG and GB. Conclusions: Preoperative vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is common in MBS candidates. Regular follow-up with correct supplementation is recommended when undergoing MBS. Early postoperative values of vitamin D were comparable between SG and OAGB.

11 May 2023 in Obesity Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DDDanit Dayan
Danit Dayan
Fahim KananiFahim Kanani
Fahim Kanani
ABAnat Bendayan
Anat Bendayan
ENEran Nizri
Eran Nizri
GLGuy Lahat
Guy Lahat
Adam Abu AbeidAdam Abu Abeid
Adam Abu Abeid

1 February 2018 in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Adam Abu AbeidAdam Abu Abeid
Adam Abu Abeid
YLYonatan Lessing
Yonatan Lessing
NPNiv Pencovich
Niv Pencovich
DDDanit Dayan
Danit Dayan
JKJoseph M. Klausner
Joseph M. Klausner
SASubhi Abu-Abeid
Subhi Abu-Abeid

12 March 2022 in Obesity Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adam Abu AbeidAdam Abu Abeid
Adam Abu Abeid
SASubhi Abu Abeid
Subhi Abu Abeid
ENEran Nizri
Eran Nizri
JKJoseph Kuriansky
Joseph Kuriansky
GLGuy Lahat
Guy Lahat
DDDanit Dayan
Danit Dayan

6 June 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Adam Abu AbeidAdam Abu Abeid
Adam Abu Abeid
OGOr Goren
Or Goren
SEShai Meron Eldar
Shai Meron Eldar
Antonio VitielloAntonio Vitiello
Antonio Vitiello
GBGiovanna Berardi
Giovanna Berardi
DDDanit Dayan
Danit Dayan
Background: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is safe and effective. Its strong malabsorptive component might cause severe protein–energy malnutrition (PEM), necessitating revisional surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of OAGB revision for severe PEM. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of OAGB patients undergoing revision for severe PEM (2015–2021). Perioperative data and outcomes were retrieved. Results: Ten patients underwent revision for severe PEM. Our center’s incidence is 0.63% (9/1425 OAGB). All patients were symptomatic. Median (interquartile range) EWL and lowest albumin were 103.7% (range 57.6, 114) and 24 g/dL (range 19, 27), respectively, and 8/10 patients had significant micronutrient deficiencies. Before revision, nutritional optimization was undertaken. Median OAGB to revision interval was 18.4 months (range 15.7, 27.8). Median BPL length was 200 cm (range 177, 227). Reversal (n = 5), BPL shortening (n = 3), and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 2) were performed. One patient had anastomotic leak after BPL shortening. No death occurred. Median BMI and albumin increased from 22.4 kg/m2 (range 20.6, 30.3) and 35.5 g/dL (range 29.2, 41), respectively, at revision to 27.5 (range 22.2, 32.4) kg/m2 and 39.5 g/dL (range 37.2, 41.7), respectively, at follow-up (median 25.4 months, range 3.1, 45). Complete resolution occurs after conversion to RYGB or reversal to normal anatomy, but not after BPL shortening. Conclusions: Revisional surgery of OAGB for severe PEM is feasible and safe after nutritional optimization. Our results suggest that the type of revision may be an important factor for PEM resolution. Comparative studies are needed to define the role of each revisional option.