Cendrine Mony

Dr. Cendrine Mony

Beaulieu Campus, University of Rennes, 35042 Rennes, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIka Djukic
Ika Djukic
SKSebastian Kepfer-Rojas
Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas
ISInger Kappel Schmidt
Inger Kappel Schmidt
KLKlaus Steenberg Larsen
Klaus Steenberg Larsen
CBClaus Beier
Claus Beier
ZTZsolt Tóth
Zsolt Tóth

17 September 2022 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GAGontran Arnault
Gontran Arnault
CMCendrine Mony
Cendrine Mony
PVPhilippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse

20 November 2020 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCendrine Mony
Cendrine Mony
PVPhilippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse
BBBrendan J. M. Bohannan
Brendan J. M. Bohannan
KPKabir Peay
Kabir Peay
MLMathew A Leibold
Mathew A Leibold
Microbes encompass tremendous biodiversity, provide support to all living forms, including humans, and play an important role in many ecosystem services. The rules that govern microorganism community assembly are increasingly revealed due to key advances in molecular and analytical methods but their understanding remain a key challenge in microbial ecology. The existence of biogeographic patterns within microbial communities has been established and explained in relation to landscape-scale processes, including selection, drift, dispersal and mutation. The effect of habitat patchiness on microorganisms’ assembly rules remains though incompletely understood. Here, we review how landscape ecology principles can be adapted to explore new perspectives on the mechanisms that determine microbial community structure. To provide a general overview, we characterize microbial landscapes, the spatial and temporal scales of the mechanisms that drive microbial assembly and the feedback between microorganisms and landscape structure. We provide evidence for the effects of landscape heterogeneity, landscape fragmentation and landscape dynamics on microbial community structure, and show that predictions made for macro-organisms at least partly also apply to microorganisms. We explain why emerging metacommunity approaches in microbial ecology should include explicit characterization of landscape structure in their development and interpretation. We also explain how biotic interactions, such as competition, prey-predator or mutualist relations may influence the microbial landscape and may be involved in the above-mentioned feedback process. However, we argue that the application of landscape ecology to the microbial world cannot simply involve transposing existing theoretical frameworks. This is due to the particularity of these organisms, in terms of size, generation time, and for some of them, tight interaction with hosts. These characteristics imply dealing with unusual and dependent space and time scales of effect. Evolutionary processes have also a strong importance in microorganisms’ response to their landscapes. Lastly, microorganisms’ activity and distribution induce feedback effects on the landscape that have to be taken into account. The transposition of the landscape ecology framework to microorganisms provides many challenging research directions for microbial ecology.

13 May 2022 in Ecography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCendrine Mony
Cendrine Mony
LULéa Uroy
Léa Uroy
FKFadwa Khalfallah
Fadwa Khalfallah
NHNick Haddad
Nick Haddad
PVPhilippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Because of land use changes, a worldwide decrease in biodiversity is underway, mostly driven by habitat degradation and fragmentation. Increasing landscape connectivity (i.e. the degree to which the landscape facilitates movement between habitat patches) has been proposed as a key landscape‐level strategy to counterbalance the negative effects of habitat fragmentation. A robust theoretical and methodological framework has been developed for the concept of connectivity, and an increasing body of empirical evidence supports the relevance of connectivity for biodiversity. However, the framework was built ignoring species that represent the dominant proportion of biodiversity on earth: microorganisms. The extent to which the existing conceptual and methodological frameworks on connectivity can be applied to microorganisms remain unknown. We reviewed existing evidence and analyzed methods to test the influence of connectivity on microorganisms. We included all types of microorganisms, from symbiotic to pathogenic and free‐living microorganisms, across all ecosystems. We describe the effect of connectivity on microorganism populations and communities, and identify the limitations and large gaps in current knowledge. Microorganisms can differ from macroorganisms in their response to connectivity due to short (distance less than a meter) dispersal distance of some groups, longer time lag of microorganisms response (possibly accompanied by evolutionary processes) and host association. The latter relies on tight interactions and feedback effects that drive microbial‐landscape relationships and lead to possible coadaptation processes. Incorporating the connectivity concept in microbial community assembly rules to preserve the diversity of microbial communities and the ecosystem services they provide could be a crucial step forward in the face of pressing global changes.

19 April 2021 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCendrine Mony
Cendrine Mony
VGValentin Gaudu
Valentin Gaudu
CRClaire Ricono
Claire Ricono
OJOlivier Jambon
Olivier Jambon
PVPhilippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse

10 June 2012 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BOBeáta Oborny
Beáta Oborny
CMCendrine Mony
Cendrine Mony
THT. Herben
T. Herben