Kenneth Dean Swanson

Dr. Kenneth Dean Swanson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 May 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNidhi Gera
Nidhi Gera
AYAaron Yang
Aaron Yang
THTalia S. Holtzman
Talia S. Holtzman
SLSze Xian Lee
Sze Xian Lee
EWEric T. Wong
Eric T. Wong
KSKenneth Dean Swanson
Kenneth Dean Swanson
The anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy and radiation are thought to be mediated by triggering G1/S or G2/M cell cycle checkpoints, while spindle poisons, such as paclitaxel, block metaphase exit by initiating the spindle assembly checkpoint. In contrast, we have found that 150 kilohertz (kHz) alternating electric fields, also known as Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), perturbed cells at the transition from metaphase to anaphase. Cells exposed to the TTFields during mitosis showed normal progression to this point, but exhibited uncontrolled membrane blebbing that coincided with metaphase exit. The ability of such alternating electric fields to affect cellular physiology is likely to be dependent on their interactions with proteins possessing high dipole moments. The mitotic Septin complex consisting of Septin 2, 6 and 7, possesses a high calculated dipole moment of 2711 Debyes (D) and plays a central role in positioning the cytokinetic cleavage furrow, and governing its contraction during ingression. We showed that during anaphase, TTFields inhibited Septin localization to the anaphase spindle midline and cytokinetic furrow, as well as its association with microtubules during cell attachment and spreading on fibronectin. After aberrant metaphase exit as a consequence of TTFields exposure, cells exhibited aberrant nuclear architecture and signs of cellular stress including an overall decrease in cellular proliferation, followed by apoptosis that was strongly influenced by the p53 mutational status. Thus, TTFields are able to diminish cell proliferation by specifically perturbing key proteins involved in cell division, leading to mitotic catastrophe and subsequent cell death.

1 December 2010 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBing Li
Bing Li
ACAna P. Castano
Ana P. Castano
THThomas E. Hudson
Thomas E. Hudson
BNBrian T. Nowlin
Brian T. Nowlin
SLShuei-Liong Lin
Shuei-Liong Lin
JDJeremy S. Duffield
Jeremy S. Duffield

30 June 2015 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEric T Wong
Eric T Wong
ELE Lok
E Lok
SGS Gautam
S Gautam
KSKenneth Dean Swanson
Kenneth Dean Swanson
Background: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma have a poor outcome. Data from the phase III registration trial comparing tumour-treating alternating electric fields (TTFields) vs chemotherapy provided a unique opportunity to study dexamethasone effects on patient outcome unencumbered by the confounding immune and myeloablative side effects of chemotherapy. Methods: Using an unsupervised binary partitioning algorithm, we segregated both cohorts of the trial based on the dexamethasone dose that yielded the greatest statistical difference in overall survival (OS). The results were validated in a separate cohort treated in a single institution with TTFields and their T lymphocytes were correlated with OS. Results: Patients who used dexamethasone doses >4.1 mg per day had a significant reduction in OS when compared with those who used ⩽4.1 mg per day, 4.8 vs 11.0 months respectively (χ 2=34.6, P<0.0001) in the TTField-treated cohort and 6.0 vs 8.9 months respectively (χ 2=10.0, P4.1 mg per day was 3.2 months compared with those who used ⩽4.1 mg per day was 8.7 months (χ 2=11.1, P=0.0009). There was a significant correlation between OS and T-lymphocyte counts. Conclusions: Dexamethasone exerted profound effects on both TTFields and chemotherapy efficacy resulting in lower patient OS. Therefore, global immunosuppression by dexamethasone likely interferes with immune functions that are necessary for the treatment of glioblastoma.

1 January 2012 in Journal of Cell Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFrancis J. Alenghat
Francis J. Alenghat
QBQuentin J. Baca
Quentin J. Baca
NRNooreen T. Rubin
Nooreen T. Rubin
LPLily I. Pao
Lily I. Pao
TMTakashi Matozaki
Takashi Matozaki
KSKenneth Dean Swanson
Kenneth Dean Swanson
Summary Macrophages migrate to sites of insult during normal inflammatory responses. Integrins guide such migration, but the transmission of signals from integrins into the requisite cytoskeletal changes is poorly understood. We have discovered that the hematopoietic adaptor protein Skap2 is necessary for macrophage migration, chemotaxis, global actin reorganization and local actin reorganization upon integrin engagement. Binding of phosphatidylinositol [3,4,5]-triphosphate to the Skap2 pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain, which relieves its conformational auto-inhibition, is critical for this integrin-driven cytoskeletal response. Skap2 enables integrin-induced tyrosyl phosphorylation of Src-family kinases (SFKs), Adap, and Sirpα, establishing their roles as signaling partners in this process. Furthermore, macrophages lacking functional Sirpα unexpectedly have impaired local integrin-induced responses identical to those of Skap2−/− macrophages, and Skap2 requires Sirpα for its recruitment to engaged integrins and for coordinating downstream actin rearrangement. By revealing the positive-regulatory role of Sirpα in a Skap2-mediated mechanism connecting integrin engagement with cytoskeletal rearrangement, these data demonstrate that Sirpα is not exclusively immunoinhibitory, and illuminate previously unexplained observations implicating Skap2 and Sirpα in mouse models of inflammatory disease.

6 December 2007 in Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKenneth Dean Swanson
Kenneth Dean Swanson
JWJordan M. Winter
Jordan M. Winter
MRMarcelo Reis
Marcelo Reis
MBMohamed Bentires‐Alj
Mohamed Bentires‐Alj
HGHeidi Greulich
Heidi Greulich
BNBenjamin G. Neel
Benjamin G. Neel

26 January 2015 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEric T Wong
Eric T Wong
ELEdwin Lok
Edwin Lok
KSKenneth Dean Swanson
Kenneth Dean Swanson
The NovoTTF‐100A is a device that emits alternating electric fields and it is approved for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. It works by perturbing tumor cells during mitosis as they enter anaphase leading to aneuploidy, asymmetric chromosome segregation and cell death with evidence of increased immunogenicity. Clinical trial data have shown equivalent efficacy when compared to salvage chemotherapies in recurrent disease. Responders were found to have had a lower dexamethasone usage and a higher rate of prior low‐grade histology. We treated a series of patients with NovoTTF‐100A and bevacizumab alone (n = 34) or in combination with a regimen consisting of 6‐thioguanine, lomustine, capecitabine, and celecoxib (TCCC) (n = 3). Compared to the former cohort, the latter cohort exhibited a trend for prolonged overall survival, median 4.1 (0.3–22.7) months versus 10.3 (7.7–13.6) months respectively (P = 0.0951), with one experiencing an objective response with a 50% reduction in tumor size on magnetic resonance imaging despite possessing a larger tumor size at baseline and more severe neurologic dysfunction than the median for either group. These observations illustrate the possibility of improving survival and achieving a response in patients with end‐stage recurrent glioblastoma by biasing the tumor toward anti‐tumor immunologic response with a combination of NovoTTF‐100A and TCCC, as well as the continuation of bevacizumab in order to limit dexamethasone use due to its global immunosuppressive effect on the patient.