Sergey V. Moiseev

Prof. Sergey V. Moiseev

Tareev Clinic of Internal Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119992 Moscow, Russia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJennifer B Green
Jennifer B Green
SJSalim Janmohamed
Salim Janmohamed
NJNigel P Jones
Nigel P Jones
ARAnne E Rosenberg
Anne E Rosenberg
KSKristina N Sigmon
Kristina N Sigmon
TMTrisha Mandal
Trisha Mandal

14 September 2017 in Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XBXavier Bossuyt
Xavier Bossuyt
JTJan-Willem Cohen Tervaert
Jan-Willem Cohen Tervaert
YAYoshihiro Arimura
Yoshihiro Arimura
DBDaniel Blockmans
Daniel Blockmans
LFLuis Felipe Flores-Suárez
Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
ECElena Csernok
Elena Csernok
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are valuable laboratory markers used for the diagnosis of well-defined types of small-vessel vasculitis, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). According to the 1999 international consensus on ANCA testing, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) should be used to screen for ANCAs, and samples containing ANCAs should then be tested by immunoassays for proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCAs and myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCAs. The distinction between PR3-ANCAs and MPO-ANCAs has important clinical and pathogenic implications. As dependable immunoassays for PR3-ANCAs and MPO-ANCAs have become broadly available, there is increasing international agreement that high-quality immunoassays are the preferred screening method for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. The present Consensus Statement proposes that high-quality immunoassays can be used as the primary screening method for patients suspected of having the ANCA-associated vaculitides GPA and MPA without the categorical need for IIF, and presents and discusses evidence to support this recommendation.

1 September 2020 in Autoimmunity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSergey V. Moiseev
Sergey V. Moiseev
JTJan Willem Cohen Tervaert
Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert
YAYoshihiro Arimura
Yoshihiro Arimura
DBDimitrios P. Bogdanos
Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
ECElena Csernok
Elena Csernok
XBXavier Bossuyt
Xavier Bossuyt

22 January 2019 in Arthritis & Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDavid Jayne
David Jayne
DBDaniel Blockmans
Daniel Blockmans
RLRaashid Luqmani
Raashid Luqmani
SMSergey V. Moiseev
Sergey V. Moiseev
BJBeulah Ji
Beulah Ji
MWMichael Walsh
Michael Walsh
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of belimumab as adjunctive therapy to maintain remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV).Methods: In this multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, patients with AAV (ages ≥18 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day), low‐dose oral glucocorticoids (≤10 mg/day), and either intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, following remission induction with rituximab or cyclophosphamide along with glucocorticoids. The primary end point was time to first protocol‐specified event (PSE), with first PSE defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of ≥6, presence of ≥1 major BVAS item, or receipt of prohibited medications for any reason, resulting in treatment failure (adjusted for ANCA type [proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO)], disease stage at induction, and induction regimen). Vasculitis relapse was defined as the PSE of either a BVAS activity score of ≥6 or receipt of prohibited medications for vasculitis. Changes in treatment practice led to truncation of the study population from ~300 patients to ~100 patients.Results: The intent‐to‐treat population totaled 105 patients with AAV, of whom 52 (40 with PR3‐ANCAs, 12 with MPO‐ANCAs) received placebo and 53 (41 with PR3‐ANCAs, 12 with MPO‐ANCAs) received belimumab; 27 of the patients were in rituximab‐induced disease remission, while 78 were in cyclophosphamide‐induced disease remission at baseline. Compared with placebo, treatment with belimumab did not reduce the risk of a PSE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.44–2.59; P = 0.884) or vasculitis relapse (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29–2.65; P = 0.821). The overall rate of PSEs was low (11 [21.2%] of 52 patients receiving placebo, 10 [18.9%] of 53 patients receiving belimumab). Vasculitis relapse in the placebo group (n = 8) occurred independent of the induction regimen, disease stage, or ANCA type. All vasculitis relapses in the belimumab group (n = 6) occurred in patients who had PR3‐ANCA–associated vasculitis with cyclophosphamide‐induced disease remission. Adverse events occurred in 49 (92.5%) of 53 patients receiving belimumab and 43 (82.7%) of 52 patients receiving placebo, with no new safety concerns.Conclusion: Belimumab plus azathioprine and glucocorticoids for the maintenance of remission in AAV did not reduce the risk of relapse.

6 April 2016 in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSergey V. Moiseev
Sergey V. Moiseev
PNPavel Novikov
Pavel Novikov
DJDavid Jayne
David Jayne
NMNikolay Mukhin
Nikolay Mukhin
The outcomes in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis have improved significantly over the past decades, although a significant proportion of them still reach end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with a relatively low risk of relapsing vasculitis as a result of anti-rejection treatment after kidney transplantation or quiescence of the autoimmune process in haemodialysis patients, but a flare of vasculitis in the latter setting presents a challenge because the treatment is poorly tolerated. There are benefits of rituximab in haemodialysed patients, as it is more steroid sparing in the treatment of extrarenal disease. More favourable outcomes of kidney transplantation compared with haemodialysis support its use as a preferable method of RRT in patients with vasculitis remission or low disease activity.

1 November 2020 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSergey V. Moiseev
Sergey V. Moiseev
XBXavier Bossuyt
Xavier Bossuyt
YAYoshihiro Arimura
Yoshihiro Arimura
DBDaniel Blockmans
Daniel Blockmans
ECElena Csernok
Elena Csernok
OGon behalf of the European EGPA Study Group
on behalf of the European EGPA Study Group
An international consensus on antineutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) testing in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is presented. ANCA, specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO), can be detected in 30–35% of patients with EGPA. MPO-ANCA should be tested with antigen-specific immunoassays in any patient with eosinophilic asthma and clinical features suggesting EGPA, including constitutional symptoms; purpura; polyneuropathy; unexplained heart, gastrointestinal, or kidney disease; and/or pulmonary infiltrates or hemorrhage. A positive MPO-ANCA result contributes to the diagnostic workup for EGPA. Patients with MPO-ANCA–associated EGPA have vasculitis features, such as glomerulonephritis, neuropathy, and skin manifestations, more frequently than patients with ANCA-negative EGPA. However, the presence of MPO-ANCA is neither sensitive nor specific enough to identify whether a patient should be subclassified as having “vasculitic” or “eosinophilic” EGPA. At present, ANCA status cannot guide treatment decisions, that is, whether cyclophosphamide, rituximab, or mepolizumab should be added to conventional glucocorticoid treatment. In EGPA, monitoring of ANCA is only useful when MPO-ANCA was tested positive at disease onset.