Florian Kraxner

Dr. Florian Kraxner

Center for Landscape Resilience & Management (CLR), Ecosystems Services and Management (ESM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 December 2015 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPete Smith
Pete Smith
SDSteven J. Davis
Steven J. Davis
FCFelix Creutzig
Felix Creutzig
SFSabine Fuss
Sabine Fuss
JMJan Minx
Jan Minx
CYCho Yongsung
Cho Yongsung

21 September 2014 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFSabine Fuss
Sabine Fuss
JCJosep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell
GPGlen P. Peters
Glen P. Peters
MTMassimo Tavoni
Massimo Tavoni
RARobbie M. Andrew
Robbie M. Andrew
YYYoshiki Yamagata
Yoshiki Yamagata

1 October 2011 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPetr Havlík
Petr Havlík
USUwe Andreas Schneider
Uwe Andreas Schneider
ESErwin Schmid
Erwin Schmid
HBHannes Böttcher
Hannes Böttcher
SFSteffen Fritz
Steffen Fritz
MOMichael Obersteiner
Michael Obersteiner

24 February 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PHPetr Havlík
Petr Havlík
HVHugo Valin
Hugo Valin
MHMario Herrero
Mario Herrero
MOMichael Obersteiner
Michael Obersteiner
ESErwin Schmid
Erwin Schmid
ANAn Notenbaert
An Notenbaert
Livestock are responsible for 12% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable intensification of livestock production systems might become a key climate mitigation technology. However, livestock production systems vary substantially, making the implementation of climate mitigation policies a formidable challenge. Here, we provide results from an economic model using a detailed and high-resolution representation of livestock production systems. We project that by 2030 autonomous transitions toward more efficient systems would decrease emissions by 736 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MtCO2e⋅y−1), mainly through avoided emissions from the conversion of 162 Mha of natural land. A moderate mitigation policy targeting emissions from both the agricultural and land-use change sectors with a carbon price of US$10 per tCO2e could lead to an abatement of 3,223 MtCO2e⋅y−1. Livestock system transitions would contribute 21% of the total abatement, intra- and interregional relocation of livestock production another 40%, and all other mechanisms would add 39%. A comparable abatement of 3,068 MtCO2e⋅y−1 could be achieved also with a policy targeting only emissions from land-use change. Stringent climate policies might lead to reductions in food availability of up to 200 kcal per capita per day globally. We find that mitigation policies targeting emissions from land-use change are 5 to 10 times more efficient—measured in “total abatement calorie cost”—than policies targeting emissions from livestock only. Thus, fostering transitions toward more productive livestock production systems in combination with climate policies targeting the land-use change appears to be the most efficient lever to deliver desirable climate and food availability outcomes. Significance The livestock sector contributes significantly to global warming through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. At the same time, livestock is an invaluable source of nutrition and livelihood for millions of poor people. Therefore, climate mitigation policies involving livestock must be designed with extreme care. Here we demonstrate the large mitigation potential inherent in the heterogeneity of livestock production systems. We find that even within existing systems, autonomous transitions from extensive to more productive systems would decrease GHG emissions and improve food availability. Most effective climate policies involving livestock would be those targeting emissions from land-use change. To minimize the economic and social cost, policies should target emissions at their source—on the supply side—rather than on the demand side.

16 January 2015 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFSteffen Fritz
Steffen Fritz
LSLinda See
Linda See
IMIan McCallum
Ian McCallum
LYLiangzhi You
Liangzhi You
ABAndriy Bun
Andriy Bun
MOMichael Obersteiner
Michael Obersteiner

13 November 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLidong Mo
Lidong Mo
CZConstantin M. Zohner
Constantin M. Zohner
PRPeter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich
JLJingjing Liang
Jingjing Liang
Sergio de MiguelSergio de Miguel
Sergio de Miguel
TCThomas W. Crowther
Thomas W. Crowther
Forests are a substantial terrestrial carbon sink, but anthropogenic changes in land use and climate have considerably reduced the scale of this system1. Remote-sensing estimates to quantify carbon losses from global forests2–5 are characterized by considerable uncertainty and we lack a comprehensive ground-sourced evaluation to benchmark these estimates. Here we combine several ground-sourced6 and satellite-derived approaches2,7,8 to evaluate the scale of the global forest carbon potential outside agricultural and urban lands. Despite regional variation, the predictions demonstrated remarkable consistency at a global scale, with only a 12% difference between the ground-sourced and satellite-derived estimates. At present, global forest carbon storage is markedly under the natural potential, with a total deficit of 226 Gt (model range = 151–363 Gt) in areas with low human footprint. Most (61%, 139 Gt C) of this potential is in areas with existing forests, in which ecosystem protection can allow forests to recover to maturity. The remaining 39% (87 Gt C) of potential lies in regions in which forests have been removed or fragmented. Although forests cannot be a substitute for emissions reductions, our results support the idea2,3,9 that the conservation, restoration and sustainable management of diverse forests offer valuable contributions to meeting global climate and biodiversity targets.