Zhibin Liang

Prof. Zhibin Liang

School of Mathematics Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2014 in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
KYKam Chuen Yuen
Kam Chuen Yuen
In this paper, we consider the optimal proportional reinsurance strategy in a risk model with two dependent classes of insurance business, where the two claim number processes are correlated through a common shock component. Under the criterion of maximizing the expected exponential utility with the variance premium principle, we adopt a nonstandard approach to examining the existence and uniqueness of the optimal reinsurance strategy. Using the technique of stochastic control theory, closed-form expressions for the optimal strategy and the value function are derived for the compound Poisson risk model as well as for the Brownian motion risk model. From the numerical examples, we see that the optimal results for the compound Poisson risk model are very different from those for the diffusion model. The former depends not only on the safety loading, time, and the interest rate, but also on the claim size distributions and the claim number processes, while the latter depends only on the safety loading, time, and the interest rate.

8 September 2021 in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYu Yuan
Yu Yuan
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
XHXia Han
Xia Han
In this paper, we determine a robust reinsurance contract from joint interests of the insurer and reinsurer under the framework of Stackelberg differential game. More specifically, the reinsurer is the leader of the game and decides on an optimal reinsurance premium to charge, while the insurer is the follower of the game and chooses an optimal proportional reinsurance to purchase. In order to defend the large shocks of wealth process, a loss-dependent premium principle is applied to the insurer. Meanwhile, we incorporate model uncertainty into the reinsurer's controlled surplus due to the asymmetric information. Under the time-consistent mean-variance criterion, we derive the robust reinsurance contract explicitly by solving the coupled extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman systems. It is interesting to prove that the optimal premium control for the reinsurer is determined by a time-adjusted variance principle. In addition, we find that the reinsurer would like to raise the reinsurance price to guard against the model uncertainty, which consequently decreases the insurer's reinsurance demand. Finally, further analyses are provided to show the necessity of considering the model uncertainty; otherwise, the reinsurance company will suffer a great loss of utility.

17 November 2011 in Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
KYKam Chuen Yuen
Kam Chuen Yuen
KCKa Chun Cheung
Ka Chun Cheung

6 April 2016 in Mathematical Methods of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
JBJunna Bi
Junna Bi
KYKC Yuen
KC Yuen
CZCaibin Zhang
Caibin Zhang

6 November 2007 in Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
JGJunyi Guo
Junyi Guo

8 May 2007 in Stochastic Models
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZhibin Liang
Zhibin Liang
JGJunyi Guo
Junyi Guo
In this paper, we consider optimal proportional reinsurance from an insurer's point of view to maximize the adjustment coefficient. We obtain the explicit expressions for the optimal results in the diffusion approximation case as well as in the jump-diffusion case. Further, we derive a sharper bound on the ruin probability. When the claim sizes are exponentially distributed, we can prove that the Lundberg's inequality also holds for the ruin probability in the diffusion approximation case. Some numerical examples are presented to show that the ruin probability in the diffusion approximation case sometimes underestimates the ruin probability.