BACE1 (beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1) was initially cloned and characterized in 1999. It is required for the generation of all monomeric forms of amyloid-β (Aβ), including Aβ42, which aggregates into bioactive conformational species and likely initiates toxicity in Alzheimer's disease (AD). BACE1 concentrations and rates of activity are increased in AD brains and body fluids, thereby supporting the hypothesis that BACE1 plays a critical role in AD pathophysiology. Therefore, BACE1 is a prime drug target for slowing down Aβ production in early AD. Besides the amyloidogenic pathway, BACE1 has other substrates that may be important for synaptic plasticity and synaptic homeostasis. Indeed, germline and adult conditional BACE1 knockout mice display complex neurological phenotypes. Despite BACE1 inhibitor clinical trials conducted so far being discontinued for futility or safety reasons, BACE1 remains a well-validated therapeutic target for AD. A safe and efficacious compound with high substrate selectivity as well as a more accurate dose regimen, patient population, and disease stage may yet be found. Further research should focus on the role of Aβ and BACE1 in physiological processes and key pathophysiological mechanisms of AD. The functions of BACE1 and the homologue BACE2, as well as the biology of Aβ in neurons and glia, deserve further investigation. Cellular and molecular studies of BACE1 and BACE2 knockout mice coupled with biomarker-based human research will help elucidate the biological functions of these important enzymes and identify their substrates and downstream effects. Such studies will have critical implications for BACE1 inhibition as a therapeutic approach for AD.

Objective: To evaluate CSF levels of β-amyloid_(1-42) (Aβ₄₂) alone and in combination with CSF tau for distinguishing AD from other conditions. Methods: At 10 centers in Europe and the United States, 150 CSF samples from AD patients were analyzed and compared with 100 CSF samples from healthy volunteers or patients with disorders not associated with pathologic conditions of the brain (CON), 84 patients with other neurologic disorders (ND), and 79 patients with non-Alzheimer types of dementia (NAD). Sandwich ELISA techniques were used on site for measuring Aβ₄₂ and tau. Results: Median levels of Aβ₄₂ in CSF were significantly lower in AD (487 pg/mL) than in CON (849 pg/mL; p = 0.001), ND (643 pg/mL; p = 0.001), and NAD (603 pg/mL; p = 0.001). Discrimination of AD from CON and ND was significantly improved by the combined assessment of Aβ₄₂ and tau. At 85% sensitivity, specificity of the combined test was 86% (95% CI: 81% to 91%) compared with 55% (95% CI: 47% to 62%) for Aβ₄₂ alone and 65% (95% CI: 58% to 72%) for tau. The combined test at 85% sensitivity was 58% (95% CI: 47% to 69%) specific for NAD. The APOE e4 gene load was negatively correlated with Aβ₄₂ levels not only in AD but also in NAD. Conclusions: The combined measure of CSF Aβ₄₂ and tau meets the requirements for clinical use in discriminating AD from normal aging and specific neurologic disorders.

Biochemical markers have a central position in the diagnosis and management of patients in clinical medicine, and also in clinical research and drug development, also for brain disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is frequently used for measurement of low-abundance biomarkers. However, the quality of ELISA methods varies, which may introduce both systematic and random errors. This urges the need for more rigorous control of assay performance, regardless of its use in a research setting, in clinical routine, or drug development. The aim of a method validation is to present objective evidence that a method fulfills the requirements for its intended use. Although much has been published on which parameters to investigate in a method validation, less is available on a detailed level on how to perform the corresponding experiments. To remedy this, standard operating procedures (SOPs) with step-by-step instructions for a number of different validation parameters is included in the present work together with a validation report template, which allow for a well-ordered presentation of the results. Even though the SOPs were developed with the intended use for immunochemical methods and to be used for multicenter evaluations, most of them are generic and can be used for other technologies as well.

ALZHEIMER disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. Although rare familial forms of AD exist, most patients have no clear family history and are classified as having sporadic AD. Today, the diagnosis of sporadic AD is based on relatively vague clinical criteria¹; diagnosis is definite only with an autopsy examination. Therefore, in clinical routine and especially in view of existing (acetylcholine esterase inhibitors) and emerging (eg, neuroprotective) therapeutic compounds, there is a pressing need for biochemical diagnostic markers of AD. Such biochemical markers would be especially helpful in the early course of the disease, when drug administration may have the greatest potential of being effective but clinical diagnosis is particularly difficult. Moreover, biochemical markers might also be useful to monitor the effect of new potential therapeutic compounds during treatment trials.