Michal Bejger

Dr. Michal Bejger


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2014 in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAF Acernese
F Acernese
MAM Agathos
M Agathos
KAKazuhiro Agatsuma
Kazuhiro Agatsuma
DAD Aisa
D Aisa
NAN Allemandou
N Allemandou
JZJ-P Zendri
J-P Zendri
Advanced Virgo is the project to upgrade the Virgo interferometric detector of gravitational waves, with the aim of increasing the number of observable galaxies (and thus the detection rate) by three orders of magnitude. The project is now in an advanced construction phase and the assembly and integration will be completed by the end of 2015. Advanced Virgo will be part of a network, alongside the two Advanced LIGO detectors in the US and GEO HF in Germany, with the goal of contributing to the early detection of gravitational waves and to opening a new window of observation on the universe. In this paper we describe the main features of the Advanced Virgo detector and outline the status of the construction.

1 May 2021 in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
TAT. D. Abbott
T. D. Abbott
SAS. Abraham
S. Abraham
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
KAKendall Ackley
Kendall Ackley
TCThe LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration
We report on the population of 47 compact binary mergers detected with a false-alarm rate of < 1 yr − 1 in the second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. We observe several characteristics of the merging binary black hole (BBH) population not discernible until now. First, the primary mass spectrum contains structure beyond a power law with a sharp high-mass cutoff; it is more consistent with a broken power law with a break at 39.7 − 9.1 + 20.3 M ⊙ or a power law with a Gaussian feature peaking at 33.1 − 5.6 + 4.0 M ⊙ (90% credible interval). While the primary mass distribution must extend to ∼ 65 M ⊙ or beyond, only 2.9 − 1.7 + 3.5 % of systems have primary masses greater than 45 M ⊙ . Second, we find that a fraction of BBH systems have component spins misaligned with the orbital angular momentum, giving rise to precession of the orbital plane. Moreover, 12 %– 44 % of BBH systems have spins tilted by more than 90°, giving rise to a negative effective inspiral spin parameter, χ eff . Under the assumption that such systems can only be formed by dynamical interactions, we infer that between 25% and 93% of BBHs with nonvanishing ∣ χ eff ∣ > 0.01 are dynamically assembled. Third, we estimate merger rates, finding R BBH = 23.9 − 8.6 + 14.3 Gpc − 3 yr − 1 for BBHs and R BNS = 320 − 240 + 490 Gpc − 3 yr − 1 for binary neutron stars. We find that the BBH rate likely increases with redshift ( 85 % credibility) but not faster than the star formation rate ( 86 % credibility). Additionally, we examine recent exceptional events in the context of our population models, finding that the asymmetric masses of GW190412 and the high component masses of GW190521 are consistent with our models, but the low secondary mass of GW190814 makes it an outlier.

28 July 2023 in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
HAH. Abe
H. Abe
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
KAKendall Ackley
Kendall Ackley
SAS. Adhicary
S. Adhicary
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig
The global network of gravitational-wave observatories now includes five detectors, namely LIGO Hanford, LIGO Livingston, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO 600. These detectors collected data during their third observing run, O3, composed of three phases: O3a starting in 2019 April and lasting six months, O3b starting in 2019 November and lasting five months, and O3GK starting in 2020 April and lasting two weeks. In this paper we describe these data and various other science products that can be freely accessed through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center at https://gwosc.org. The main data set, consisting of the gravitational-wave strain time series that contains the astrophysical signals, is released together with supporting data useful for their analysis and documentation, tutorials, as well as analysis software packages.

31 October 2025 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
HAH. Abe
H. Abe
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
KAKendall Ackley
Kendall Ackley
NANaresh Adhikari
Naresh Adhikari
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig

1 June 2023 in The Astrophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
HAH. Abe
H. Abe
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
KAKendall Ackley
Kendall Ackley
NANaresh Adhikari
Naresh Adhikari
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig
We use 47 gravitational wave sources from the Third LIGO–Virgo–Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector Gravitational Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC–3) to estimate the Hubble parameter H(z), including its current value, the Hubble constant H 0. Each gravitational wave (GW) signal provides the luminosity distance to the source, and we estimate the corresponding redshift using two methods: the redshifted masses and a galaxy catalog. Using the binary black hole (BBH) redshifted masses, we simultaneously infer the source mass distribution and H(z). The source mass distribution displays a peak around 34 M ⊙, followed by a drop-off. Assuming this mass scale does not evolve with the redshift results in a H(z) measurement, yielding H 0 = 68 − 8 + 12 km s − 1 Mpc − 1 (68% credible interval) when combined with the H 0 measurement from GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart. This represents an improvement of 17% with respect to the H 0 estimate from GWTC–1. The second method associates each GW event with its probable host galaxy in the catalog GLADE+, statistically marginalizing over the redshifts of each event’s potential hosts. Assuming a fixed BBH population, we estimate a value of H 0 = 68 − 6 + 8 km s − 1 Mpc − 1 with the galaxy catalog method, an improvement of 42% with respect to our GWTC–1 result and 20% with respect to recent H 0 studies using GWTC–2 events. However, we show that this result is strongly impacted by assumptions about the BBH source mass distribution; the only event which is not strongly impacted by such assumptions (and is thus informative about H 0) is the well-localized event GW190814.

30 November 2016 in The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BAB. P. Abbott
B. P. Abbott
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
TAT. D. Abbott
T. D. Abbott
MAM. R. Abernathy
M. R. Abernathy
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
VCVirgo Collaboration)
Virgo Collaboration)
A transient gravitational-wave signal, GW150914, was identified in the twin Advanced LIGO detectors on 2015 September 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC. To assess the implications of this discovery, the detectors remained in operation with unchanged configurations over a period of 39 days around the time of the signal. At the detection statistic threshold corresponding to that observed for GW150914, our search of the 16 days of simultaneous two-detector observational data is estimated to have a false-alarm rate (FAR) of , yielding a p-value for GW150914 of . Parameter estimation follow-up on this trigger identifies its source as a binary black hole (BBH) merger with component masses at redshift (median and 90% credible range). Here, we report on the constraints these observations place on the rate of BBH coalescences. Considering only GW150914, assuming that all BBHs in the universe have the same masses and spins as this event, imposing a search FAR threshold of 1 per 100 years, and assuming that the BBH merger rate is constant in the comoving frame, we infer a 90% credible range of merger rates between (comoving frame). Incorporating all search triggers that pass a much lower threshold while accounting for the uncertainty in the astrophysical origin of each trigger, we estimate a higher rate, ranging from depending on assumptions about the BBH mass distribution. All together, our various rate estimates fall in the conservative range .