Anil Kumar Sethy

Dr. Anil Kumar Sethy


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2020 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FRFatemeh Razaei
Fatemeh Razaei
MGMilan Gaff
Milan Gaff
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
PNPeter Niemz
Peter Niemz
GKGourav Kamboj
Gourav Kamboj
MGMiroslav Gašparík
Miroslav Gašparík

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSumanta Das
Sumanta Das
MGMiroslav Gašparík
Miroslav Gašparík
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
Peter NiemzPeter Niemz
Peter Niemz
MMManaswini Mahapatra
Manaswini Mahapatra
Tomáš KytkaTomáš Kytka
Tomáš Kytka
Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is gaining popularity as a sustainable alternative to traditional building materials. However, the decline of natural vegetation and the growth of plantation hardwoods has led the researchers to consider alternatives. This study presents a comparative analysis of bending and rolling shear performance of homogenous poplar (Populus nigra L.) CLT and hybrid CLT, with maple (Acer platanoides L.), in the outer layer and poplar in the core, compared to spruce (Picea abies (L.), H. Karst.) CLT. The CLT panels were prepared using one-component polyurethane (1C-PUR) and melamine adhesive (ME). Poplar CLT exhibited equal or better properties than spruce CLT. The outer maple layer in the hybrid CLT enhanced the global bending modulus (Emg) and bending strength (fm) by 74% and 37%, respectively, due to its higher modulus of elasticity better shear resistance by reducing the cross-layer stress concentrations and rolling shear failure. Additionally, both the adhesive types and wood species significantly influenced the fm, Emg, and rolling shear strength (fr) independently, while their interaction effect was found to be non-significant. The experimental bending stiffness was higher than the theoretical values. The shear analogy method provided the most accurate results for bending and shear strengths, while bending stiffness was best predicted by the modified gamma method, with minor variations. The finite-element models (FEMs) also produced results with a deviation of only 10%.

1 October 2021 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMiroslav Gašparík
Miroslav Gašparík
EKElham Karami
Elham Karami
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
SDSumanta Das
Sumanta Das
TKTomáš Kytka
Tomáš Kytka
MGMilan Gaff
Milan Gaff

18 December 2024 in Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRoberto Corleto
Roberto Corleto
MGMilan Gaff
Milan Gaff
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
BKBhushan Uday Kelkar
Bhushan Uday Kelkar
RNRobert Nemeth
Robert Nemeth
FRFatemeh Rezaei
Fatemeh Rezaei

3 January 2019 in Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
SSS. K. Sharma
S. K. Sharma
JSJ. Simon
J. Simon

23 October 2025 in Results in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sauradipta GangulySauradipta Ganguly
Sauradipta Ganguly
SHSanjeet Kumar Hom
Sanjeet Kumar Hom
ASAnil Kumar Sethy
Anil Kumar Sethy
SDSanmitra Dan
Sanmitra Dan
BDBiswajit Debnath
Biswajit Debnath
Marko PetričMarko Petrič
Marko Petrič