Cancer care increasingly relies on imaging for patient management. The two most common cross-sectional imaging modalities in oncology are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provide high-resolution anatomic and physiological imaging. Herewith is a summary of recent applications of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) in CT and MRI oncological imaging that addresses the benefits and challenges of the resultant opportunities with examples. Major challenges remain, such as how best to integrate AI developments into clinical radiology practice, the vigorous assessment of quantitative CT and MR imaging data accuracy, and reliability for clinical utility and research integrity in oncology. Such challenges necessitate an evaluation of the robustness of imaging biomarkers to be included in AI developments, a culture of data sharing, and the cooperation of knowledgeable academics with vendor scientists and companies operating in radiology and oncology fields. Herein, we will illustrate a few challenges and solutions of these efforts using novel methods for synthesizing different contrast modality images, auto-segmentation, and image reconstruction with examples from lung CT as well as abdome, pelvis, and head and neck MRI. The imaging community must embrace the need for quantitative CT and MRI metrics beyond lesion size measurement. AI methods for the extraction and longitudinal tracking of imaging metrics from registered lesions and understanding the tumor environment will be invaluable for interpreting disease status and treatment efficacy. This is an exciting time to work together to move the imaging field forward with narrow AI-specific tasks. New AI developments using CT and MRI datasets will be used to improve the personalized management of cancer patients.

The present exploratory study investigates the performance of a new, rapid, synthetic MRI method for diagnostic image quality assessment and measurement of relaxometry metric values in head and neck (HN) tumors and normal-appearing masseter muscle. The multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence was used for data acquisition, followed by synthetic image reconstruction on a 3T MRI scanner for 14 patients (3 untreated and 11 treated). The MDME enables absolute quantification of physical tissue properties, including T1 and T2, with a shorter scan time than the current state-of-the-art methods used for relaxation measurements. The vendor termed the combined package MAGnetic resonance imaging Compilation (MAGiC). In total, 48 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed, drawn on normal-appearing masseter muscle and tumors in the HN region. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from normal-appearing muscle were 880 ± 52 ms and 46 ± 3 ms, respectively. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from tumors were 1930 ± 422 ms and 77 ± 13 ms, respectively, for the untreated group, 1745 ± 410 ms and 107 ± 61 ms, for the treated group. A total of 1552 images from both synthetic MRI and conventional clinical imaging were assessed by the radiologists to provide the rating for T1w and T2w image contrasts. The synthetically generated qualitative T2w images were acceptable and comparable to conventional diagnostic images (93% acceptability rating for both). The acceptability ratings for MAGiC-generated T1w, and conventional images were 64% and 100%, respectively. The benefit of MAGiC in HN imaging is twofold, providing relaxometry maps in a clinically feasible time and the ability to generate a different combination of contrast images in a single acquisition.

The present preliminary study aims to characterize brain metastases (BM) using T1 and T2 maps generated from newer, rapid, synthetic MRI (MAGnetic resonance image Compilation; MAGiC) in a clinical setting. We acquired synthetic MRI data from 11 BM patients on a 3T scanner. A multiple-dynamic multiple-echo (MDME) sequence was used for data acquisition and synthetic image reconstruction, including post-processing. MDME is a multi-contrast sequence that enables absolute quantification of physical tissue properties, including T1 and T2, independent of the scanner settings. In total, 82 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed, which were obtained from both normal-appearing brain tissue and BM lesions. The mean values obtained from the 48 normal-appearing brain tissue regions and 34 ROIs of BM lesions (T1 and T2) were analyzed using standard statistical methods. The mean T1 and T2 values were 1143 ms and 78 ms, respectively, for normal-appearing gray matter, 701 ms and 64 ms for white matter, and 4206 ms and 390 ms for cerebrospinal fluid. For untreated BMs, the mean T1 and T2 values were 1868 ms and 100 ms, respectively, and 2211 ms and 114 ms for the treated group. The quantitative T1 and T2 values generated from synthetic MRI can characterize BM and normal-appearing brain tissues.

Subject motion during scan is a major source of artifacts in MR examinations. Prospective motion correction is a promising technique that tracks subject motion and adjusts the imaging volume in real time; however, additional retrospective correction may be necessary to achieve robust image quality and compatibility with other imaging options. Real‐time realignment of the imaging volume by prospective motion correction changes the coil sensitivity weighting and the field inhomogeneity relative to the imaging volume. This can pose image reconstruction problems with parallel imaging and partial Fourier imaging, which rely on coil sensitivity and image phase information, respectively. This work presents a practical method for reconstructing images acquired using prospective motion correction with parallel imaging and/or partial Fourier imaging. Our proposed approach is data driven and noniterative; data are binned into several position bins based on motion measurements made during the prospective motion correction acquisition and the data in each bin are processed through intrabin operations such as parallel imaging reconstruction (in case of undersampling), phase correction, and coil combination before combination of the position bins. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique through simulation studies and in vivo experiments using a prospectively motion‐corrected three‐dimensional fast spin echo sequence. Magn Reson Med, 2013.

The purpose of the present pilot study was to estimate T1 and T2 metric values derived simultaneously from a new, rapid Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) technique, as well as to assess their ability to characterize—brain metastases (BM) and normal-appearing brain tissues. Fourteen patients with BM underwent MRI, including prototype MRF, on a 3T scanner. In total, 108 measurements were analyzed: 42 from solid parts of BM’s (21 each on T1 and T2 maps) and 66 from normal-appearing brain tissue (11 ROIs each on T1 and T2 maps for gray matter [GM], white matter [WM], and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). The BM’s mean T1 and T2 values differed significantly from normal-appearing WM (p < 0.05). The mean T1 values from normal-appearing GM, WM, and CSF regions were 1205 ms, 840 ms, and 4233 ms, respectively. The mean T2 values were 108 ms, 78 ms, and 442 ms, respectively. The mean T1 and T2 values for untreated BM (n = 4) were 2035 ms and 168 ms, respectively. For treated BM (n = 17) the T1 and T2 values were 2163 ms and 141 ms, respectively. MRF technique appears to be a promising and rapid quantitative method for the characterization of free water content and tumor morphology in BMs.