Objectives: After confirming the measurement properties of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in patients with stroke by conducting a Rasch analysis, this study sought: (i) to generate a keyform as a tool for goal-setting and intervention-planning; and (ii) to determine the appropriate strata for separating patients’ postural balance ability. Design: Methodological analyses of cross-sectional study data.Patients: A pooled sample of 156 patients with stroke: mean (standard deviation) age 74.4 (12.9) years.Methods: This study evaluated the BBS’s rating scale structure, unidimensionality, and measurement accuracy (0: unable to perform or requiring help, to 4: normal performance) and then generated a keyform and strata.Results: The BBS rating scale fulfilled the category functioning criteria. Principal component analysis of standardized residuals confirmed the unidimensionality of the test. All items fit the Rasch analysis. Person ability-item difficulty matching was good. Person reliability was 0.96, and the patients were divided into 9 strata. The keyform for the BBS will enable clinicians and investigators to estimate patients’ postural balance ability and monitor their progress.Conclusion: The BBS has strong measurement properties. This study generated both a keyform that can contribute to clinicians’ decision-making in goalsetting and intervention-planning and strata that can facilitate understanding of patients’ abilities. LAY ABSTRACTPeople who have had a stroke often have difficulty maintaining postural balance and controlling their posture. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measures a person’s ability to maintain postural balance. Several analyses were performed to investigate the measurement properties of the BBS in patients who have had a stroke. Then, a keyform tool was generated and some strata (levels) determined that separate patients according to postural balance ability. A keyform can help therapists to identify items that a patient finds relatively difficult. Use of a keyform can contribute to both rehabilitation goal-setting and planned interventions for patients. The strata can be used to detect and measure changes in a patient’s postural balance ability. The findings of this study demonstrate that the BBS has strong measurement properties and provides an appropriate keyform and 9 strata. Use of these tools can facilitate the rehabilitation of patients with stroke through quantification of a patient’s postural balance ability.

Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference between the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in acute-phase stroke patients. Design: Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study. Setting: Inpatient acute stroke rehabilitation. Subjects: Seventy-five patients with acute stroke, mean (SD) age 71.7 (12.2) years. Intervention: Inpatients with acute stroke were assessed with the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed before and after rehabilitation. Physiotherapy was conducted to improve balance and gait over a 2-week period: an average of 40 min/day on weekdays and 20 min/day on weekends and holidays. Main measures: The patients’ Berg Balance Scale, comfortable walking speed, Global Rating of Change scale (patient-rated and physiotherapist-rated), and motor score of the Functional Independence Measure were obtained. Minimal clinically important differences were estimated using both anchor- (receiver operating characteristic curves and change difference) and distribution-based approaches (minimal detectable change and 0.5× the change score [SD]). Results: The baseline scores were 31.2 (18.9) for the Berg Balance Scale and 0.79 (0.35) m/s for comfortable walking speed. The minimal clinically important difference in the Berg Balance Scale was 6.5–12.5 points by the anchor-based approach and 2.3–4.9 points by the distribution-based approach. The minimal clinically important difference in comfortable walking speed was 0.18–0.25 m/s by the anchor-based and 0.13–0.15 m/s by the distribution-based approach. Conclusions: A change of 6.5–12.5 points in the Berg Balance Scale and 0.18–0.25 m/s in the comfortable walking speed is required in these measurements’ anchor-based minimal clinically important differences to be beyond measurement error, and to be perceptible by both patients and clinicians.

Background: Evidence of the effectiveness of physiotherapy, including muscle strength training, coordination training, aerobic exercise, cycling regimen, balance training, gait training, and activity of daily living training, in patients with degenerative cerebellar ataxia (DCA) was insufficient for clinical decision making. We aimed to explore clinical outcomes and examine the parameters associated with physical impairment and activity in people with DCA based on preregistration (PROSPERO: CRD42024493883).Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, CHINAL, and PEDro databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data extraction, quality assessment, and heterogeneity analyses were conducted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of evidence, and a meta-analysis was performed.Results: Eighteen RCTs, which included 398 participants, showed a serious risk of bias (RoB) and low certainty of evidence for this primary outcome. For meta-analysis, 315 patients assessed based on the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) were included. Overall, physiotherapy significantly reduced SARA scores (MD = −1.41, [95% CI: −2.16, −0.66]); the subgroup analysis showed that the following interventions exerted significant effects: multi-aspect training program (5 studies, MD = −1.59, [95% CI: −5.15, −0.03]), balance training (3 studies, MD = −1.58, [95% CI: −2.55, −0.62]), and aerobic training (3 studies, MD = −1.65, [95% CI: −2.53, −0.77]). By contrast, vibration (2 studies, MD = −0.56, [95% CI: −2.05, 0.93]) and dual-task training (1 study, MD = 0.24, [95% CI: −6.4, 6.88]) exhibited no significant effects.Conclusion: Physical therapy, especially multi-aspect physical therapy such as muscle strengthening, coordination training, gait training, and ADL training, may reduce DCA symptoms. Further, balance and aerobic training can be added to the program. However, the estimated effect size may change in future studies because of the serious RoB, very low certainty of evidence, and high heterogeneity with SARA as the primary outcome. High-quality RCTs are required to establish evidence for the effectiveness of physical therapy in patients with DCA.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=493883, identifier: CRD42024493883.

Objectives: Although the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is known to be a reliable and valid measure of balance in individuals with stroke, the utility of this tool in relation to subacute stroke walking speed and the recovery of gait ability has not been explored. Here, we compared the measurement properties and their relationship to gait speed on the Mini-BESTest and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke, and we investigated which balance assessment tool is more likely to capture the status of the recovery of gait speed.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 88 individuals 50 years or older with stroke who had been evaluated using the Mini-BESTest by using the BBS and by assessing their comfortable walking speed (CWS). The proportion of subjects who showed improvement was calculated for 34 stroke survivors from data obtained at admission to and discharge from the hospital.Results: Compared with the BBS, the Mini-BESTest showed a better distribution of total scores without a ceiling effect. The two scales showed correlations with gait speed (Mini-BESTest: r=0.702; BBS: r=0.592) and discrimination between fast and slow walkers. The responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest was excellent, with an area under the curve of 0.894, thus discriminating between gait speed improvement versus non-improvement.Conclusions: These results indicate that the Mini-BESTest is more useful than the BBS in terms of its measurement properties and ability to measure gait recovery in middle and older ambulatory individuals with subacute stroke.