After liver transplantation (LT), the management of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections still remains a major challenge. In HCV genotype 1 patients not undergoing transplantation, the introduction of protease inhibitor (PI)–based regimens has increased the sustained virological response rate significantly. This pilot study investigated both the safety and efficacy of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy in HCV-infected LT patients with a special emphasis on drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressants and PIs. Safety and efficacy data were gathered for 12 weeks for 9 HCV-infected LT patients who were treated with a combination of TVR, pegylated interferon, and ribavirin (RBV) in parallel with immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus (TAC; n = 4), cyclosporine A (CSA; n = 4), and sirolimus (SIR; n = 1). Seven of the transplant patients completed the 12 weeks of triple therapy. At week 4, 4 of the patients were found to be HCV RNA–negative, and importantly, 8 were found to be negative at week 12. During the 12-week course of triple therapy, short-term measurements of immunosuppressant trough levels required individual dose reductions in all patients (CSA, 2.5-fold; SIR, 7-fold; and TAC, 22-fold). Furthermore, two-thirds of the patients exhibited hematological side effects requiring RBV dose reductions, the administration of erythropoietin, or even blood transfusions. In conclusion, this pilot study provides evidence showing that TVR-based triple therapy is effective within the first 4 to 12 weeks in LT patients suffering from HCV genotype 1 recurrence, and it also provides evidence showing that drug-drug interactions between TVR and immunosuppressants can be handled appropriately through the close monitoring of trough levels and adequate dosage adjustments. Liver Transpl, 2012. © 2012 AASLD.

CCK and ghrelin exert antagonistic effects on ingestive behavior. The aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction between ghrelin and CCK administered peripherally on food intake and neuronal activity in specific hypothalamic and brain stem nuclei, as assessed by c-Fos-like immunoreactivity (c-FLI) in nonfasted rats. Ghrelin (13 μg/kg body wt) injected intraperitoneally significantly increased the cumulative food intake when measured at 30 min and 1 h after injection, compared with the vehicle group (2.9 ± 1.0 g/kg body wt vs. 1.2 ± 0.5 g/kg body wt, P < 0.028). Sulfated CCK octapeptide (CCK-8S) (2 or 25 μg/kg body wt) injected simultaneously blocked the orexigenic effect of ghrelin (0.22 ± 0.13 g/kg body wt, P < 0.001 and 0.33 ± 0.23 g/kg body wt, P < 0.0008), while injected alone, both doses of CCK-8S exerted a nonsignificant trend to reduce food intake. Ghrelin (13 μg/kg body wt ip) markedly increased the number of c-FLI-positive neurons per section in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) compared with vehicle (median: 31.35 vs. 9.86, P < 0.0001). CCK-8S (2 or 25 μg/kg body wt ip) had no effect on neuronal activity in the ARC, as assessed by c-FLI (median: 5.33 and 11.21 cells per section), but blocked the ghrelin-induced increase of c-fos expression in this area when both peptides were administered simultaneously (median: 13.33 and 12.86 cells per section, respectively). Ghrelin at this dose had no effect on CCK-induced stimulation of c-fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. These results suggest that CCK abolishes ghrelin-induced food intake through dampening increased ARC neuronal activity.

Second-generation direct-acting-antiviral hepatitis C virus treatment: Efficacy, safety, and predictors of SVR12

Aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the efficacy, safety, and predictors of treatment success for first-generation-PI triple therapies, including either boceprevir or telaprevir, in a mono-centric “real-life” setting with respect to SVR 24. 131 patients (102 patients telaprevir, 29 patients boceprevir) were treated. Of these, 33/131 patients were treatment naïve, 72/131 patients had been pretreated with PEG-IFN/RBV (PR) (thereof: 36 with non-response, 30 with relapse, 6 unknown), and 26/131 patients previously had received non-pegylated interferon. 96/131 patients were infected with HCV genotype 1b. 41/131 patients had liver cirrhosis. 95/131 (73%) patients achieved SVR 24. SVR rates for subgroups were: 26/33 (79%) for treatment naïve, 25/30 (83%) for PR-relapse, 20/36 (56%) for PR-non-response, 21/26 (81%) for non-PR pretreated patients, (26/41) 63% for patients with liver cirrhosis, 23/35 (66%) genotype 1a, 72/96 (75%) genotype 1b. Predictors of SVR 24 were eRVR and a negative viral load at PI-treatment week 4 (p < 0.0001), negative predictors were quantifiable HCV viral load at PI-treatment week 4 (p < 0.0001), baseline platelet count < 100/nl (p < 0.0001), and previous PR-non-response (p = 0.006). 33/131 (25%) patients discontinued treatment prematurely, of those 14/131 (11%) patients due to virological failure. Side effects were frequent (anemia 59/131 [45%], severe infections 6/131 [5%]). According to our SVR 24 results, efficacy of PI-based triple therapy in our “real-life” cohort is comparable to the large multi-centric clinical trials. Pronounced side effects are frequent during therapy and often need complex therapeutic interventions. Since new DAA are available, it is open to discussion, if first-generation PI-triple therapy is no longer indicated at all.

Recurrent HCV infection post-liver transplantation (post-LT) is still a major challenge in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In this retrospective analysis we gathered data about treatment response and safety of all 14 post-LT patients who were treated between 2011 and 2013 at our centre with a telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy. Seven out of 14 patients completed the full treatment course of 48 weeks. Five patients achieved a SVR 24, while 3 additional HCV RNA-negative patients are still in follow-up (end of treatment, SVR 12 and 22). Four patients discontinued treatment prematurely due to side effects. A virological non-response at TW 4 was seen in 1 patient. Virological breakthrough was observed in 2 patients at TW 16 and 28, respectively; 1 patient displayed a virological relapse after the end of treatment (EOT). Patients with a complicated course post-LT accumulated most of the severe side effects, largely infections. One patient with cholestatic hepatitis died 11 weeks after discontinuation of treatment due to progressive graft failure. In conclusion, TVR-based triple therapy in post-LT patients reveals an acceptable antiviral efficacy. Unfortunately, severe side effects are frequent and often require therapeutic interventions. Therefore, with the approval of less straining DAA like sofosbuvir in sight, TVR-based triple therapy in post-LT patients should be, if possible avoided. Die Hepatitis-C-Reinfektion des Spenderorgans nach einer Lebertransplantation ist nach wie vor eine klinische Herausforderung. In dieser retrospektiven Analyse wurden daher die Tübinger Erfahrungen mit der Telaprevir-Triple-Therapie anhand des Gesamtkollektivs von 14 behandelten Patienten zwischen 2011 und 2013 zusammengefasst. Sieben der 14 Patienten konnten über die volle Therapiedauer von 48 Wochen therapiert werden. Bisher konnten fünf Patienten geheilt werden (SVR 24), drei weitere Patienten sind noch in der Nachsorgephase („end of treatment“, SVR 12 bzw. 22). Vier Patienten brachen wegen Nebenwirkungen die Therapie ab. Ein Patient hatte ein primäres virologisches Nichtansprechen, zwei Patienten hatten einen „breakthrough“, ein Patient erlitt einen „relapse“ nach Beendigung der vollen Therapiedauer. Patienten mit komplikativem Verlauf nach Lebertransplantation erlitten den Großteil der teils schwerwiegenden Nebenwirkungen, oft Infektionen. Ein Patient mit cholestatischer Rekurrenz der Hepatitis C verstarb 11 Wochen nach Therapieabbruch an den Folgen eines progredienten Transplantatversagens. Insgesamt lassen sich mit der Telaprevir-Triple-Therapie auch nach Lebertransplantation respektable Heilungsraten erzielen. Leider sind schwerwiegende und die Therapie teils limitierende Nebenwirkungen häufig. Somit sollte eine solche Therapie insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der nahenden Zulassung weniger belastender Direct-Acting-Agent (DAA) wie Sofosbuvir nach Möglichkeit vermieden werden.