Edmundo M. Mercado Silva

Dr. Edmundo M. Mercado Silva

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCinthia E. Saenz-García
Cinthia E. Saenz-García
PCPilar Castañeda-Serrano
Pilar Castañeda-Serrano
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva
CAChristine Z. Alvarado
Christine Z. Alvarado
GNGerardo Nava
Gerardo Nava
Poultry meat deterioration is caused by environmental conditions, as well as proliferation of different bacterial groups, and their interactions. It has been proposed that meat spoilage involves two bacterial groups: one group that initiates the deterioration process, known as specific spoilage organisms (SSOs), and the other known as spoilage associated organisms (SAOs) which represents all bacteria groups recovered from meat samples before, during, and after the spoilage process. Numerous studies have characterized the diversity of chicken meat SAOs; nonetheless, the identification of the SSOs remains a long-standing question. Based on recent genomic studies, it is suggested that the SSOs should possess an extensive genome size to survive and proliferate in raw meat, a cold, complex, and hostile environment. To evaluate this hypothesis, we performed comparative genomic analyses in members of the meat microbiota to identify microorganisms with extensive genome size and ability to cause chicken meat spoilage. Our studies show that members of the Pseudomonadaceae family have evolved numerous biological features such as large genomic size, slow-growing potential, low 16S rRNA copy number, psychrotrophic, and oligotrophic metabolism to initiate the spoilage of poultry meat. Moreover, inoculation experiments corroborated that these biological traits are associated with the potential to cause chicken meat deterioration. Together, these results provide new insights into the identification of SSO. Further studies are in progress to elucidate the impact of the SSO on meat quality and microbiota diversity.

1 October 2018 in Scientia Horticulturae
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJimena Esther Alba Jiménez
Jimena Esther Alba Jiménez
PBP. Benito-Bautista
P. Benito-Bautista
GNGerardo Nava
Gerardo Nava
DRDulce Rivera
Dulce Rivera
MVMa. E. Vázquez-Barrios
Ma. E. Vázquez-Barrios
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva

28 October 2013 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMiguel D. Dufoo-Hurtado
Miguel D. Dufoo-Hurtado
KZKarla G. Zavala-Gutiérrez
Karla G. Zavala-Gutiérrez
CCCong-Mei Cao
Cong-Mei Cao
LCLuis Cisneros-Zevallos
Luis Cisneros-Zevallos
Ramon Guevara-GonzalezRamon Guevara-Gonzalez
Ramon Guevara-Gonzalez
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva

22 June 2023 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCarolina N. Resendiz
Carolina N. Resendiz
FAFernando Alonso-Onofre
Fernando Alonso-Onofre
HSHilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
Hilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
ARAngel Rebollar-Alviter
Angel Rebollar-Alviter
DRDulce M. Rivera-Pastrana
Dulce M. Rivera-Pastrana
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva
Tomato is the main vegetable cultivated under soilless culture systems (SCSs); production of organic tomato under SCSs has increased due to consumer demands for healthier and environmentally friendly vegetables. However, organic tomato production under SCSs has been associated with low crop performance and fruit quality defects. These agricultural deficiencies could be linked to alterations in tomato plant microbiota; nonetheless, this issue has not been sufficiently addressed. Thus, the main goal of the present study was to characterize the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of tomato plants cultivated under conventional and organic SCSs. To accomplish this goal, tomato plants grown in commercial greenhouses under conventional or organic SCSs were tested at 8, 26, and 44 weeks after seedling transplantation. Substrate (n = 24), root (n = 24), and fruit (n = 24) composite samples were subjected to DNA extraction and high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The present study revealed that the tomato core microbiota was predominantly constituted by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Remarkably, six bacterial families, Bacillaceae, Microbacteriaceae, Nocardioidaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, and Sphingomonadaceae, were shared among all substrate, rhizosphere, and fruit samples. Importantly, it was shown that plants under organic SCSs undergo a dysbiosis characterized by significant changes in the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobiaceae, Caulobacteraceae, Chitinophagaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Erythrobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Nocardioidaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, and Streptomycetaceae. These results suggest that microbial alterations in substrates, roots, and fruits could be potential factors in contributing to the crop performance and fruit quality deficiencies observed in organic SCSs.

2 March 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCarolina N. Resendiz
Carolina N. Resendiz
GOGuadalupe E. Orozco-Mosqueda
Guadalupe E. Orozco-Mosqueda
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva
SFSusana Flores-Robles
Susana Flores-Robles
HSHilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
Hilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
GNGerardo Nava
Gerardo Nava
Due to recent outbreaks of cyclosporiasis associated with consumption of fresh berries, producers are demanding modern microbiological tools for the rapid and accurate identification of the human pathogen Cyclospora cayetanensis in berries and environmental samples. The aim of the present work was to develop a molecular tool based on a PCR approach for the rapid and accurate detection of C. cayetanensis. A nested PCR assay was validated for the amplification of a 294 bp size region of the 18S rRNA gene from C. cayetanensis. The limit of detection for the nested PCR assay was validated using 48 berry samples spiked with ~0, 10, 100, and 1000 oocyst per gram of sample. With this assay, it was possible to detect as few as 1 oocyst per gram of berry, in a 50 g sample. Sanger DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were carried out to confirm the presence of C. cayetanensis in berry (n = 17) and soil (n = 5) samples. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the C. cayetanensis sequences obtained from Mexico clustered within a group recovered from China, Peru, Guatemala-Haiti, and Japan. The PCR protocol designed in the present study could be an important tool for the rapid and accurate detection of this human pathogen in environmental and food samples.

23 December 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCarolina N. Resendiz
Carolina N. Resendiz
HSHilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
Hilda Victoria Silva-Rojas
ARAngel Rebollar-Alviter
Angel Rebollar-Alviter
DRDulce M. Rivera-Pastrana
Dulce M. Rivera-Pastrana
ESEdmundo M. Mercado Silva
Edmundo M. Mercado Silva
GNGerardo Nava
Gerardo Nava
Enterobacteriaceae is one of the most important bacterial groups within the Proteobacteria phylum. This bacterial group includes pathogens, commensal and beneficial populations. Numerous 16S rRNA gene PCR-based assays have been designed to analyze Enterobacteriaceae diversity and relative abundance, and, to the best of our knowledge, 16 primer pairs have been validated, published and used since 2003. Nonetheless, a comprehensive performance analysis of these primer sets has not yet been carried out. This information is of particular importance due to the recent taxonomic restructuration of Enterobacteriaceae into seven bacterial families. To overcome this lack of information, the identified collection of primer pairs (n = 16) was subjected to primer performance analysis using multiple bioinformatics tools. Herein it was revealed that, based on specificity and coverage of the 16S rRNA gene, these 16 primer sets could be divided into different categories: Enterobacterales-, multi-family-, multi-genus- and Enterobacteriaceae-specific primers. These results highlight the impact of taxonomy changes on performance of molecular assays and data interpretation. Moreover, they underline the urgent need to revise and update the molecular tools used for molecular microbial analyses.