Ema Sacadura-Leite

Dr. Ema Sacadura-Leite


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 July 2014 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPaulo Sousa
Paulo Sousa
Antonio Sousa UvaAntonio Sousa Uva
Antonio Sousa Uva
FSFlorentino Santos Serranheira
Florentino Santos Serranheira
CNCarla Nunes
Carla Nunes
ESEma Sacadura-Leite
Ema Sacadura-Leite
Several review studies have shown that 3.4% to 16.6% of patients in acute care hospitals experience one or more adverse events. Adverse events (AEs) in hospitals constitute a significant problem with serious consequences and a challenge for public health. The occurrence of AEs in Portuguese hospitals has not yet been systematically studied. The main purpose of this study is to estimate the incidence, impact and preventability of adverse events in Portuguese hospitals. It is also our aim to examine the feasibility of applying to Portuguese acute hospitals the methodology of detecting AEs through record review, previously used in other countries.

7 June 2018 in Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEma Sacadura-Leite
Ema Sacadura-Leite
LMLuís Mendonça-Galaio
Luís Mendonça-Galaio
OSOlena Shapovalova
Olena Shapovalova
IPIsabel Pereira
Isabel Pereira
RRRegina Rocha
Regina Rocha
Antonio Sousa UvaAntonio Sousa Uva
Antonio Sousa Uva
Infections are among the most important occupational risks for healthcare workers. Some infections can be prevented through vaccination but, in other cases, there are no vaccines to prevent them, as happens with infections from antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Precautions related with transmission route and contact isolation or respiratory isolation are very important in order to protect healthcare workers and other patients. In this paper, the authors reviewed biological hazards for healthcare workers and described the procedures undertaken by an occupational health department (OHD) of a Portuguese hospital where vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) was isolated from a patient, for the first time in Europe. After the VRSA strain isolation, healthcare workers were instructed to adopt contact preventive measures. Nasal swabs were cultured weekly in 33 healthcare workers for several weeks until the patients’ culture changed to negative. In the meantime, OHD prepared actions to adopt in case of VRSA colonization or infection in healthcare workers.

8 June 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Vasco C. RomaoVasco C. Romao
Vasco C. Romao
FOFilipa Oliveira-Ramos
Filipa Oliveira-Ramos
ACAna Rita Cruz-Machado
Ana Rita Cruz-Machado
PMPatrícia Martins
Patrícia Martins
SBSofia Barreira
Sofia Barreira
João Eurico FonsecaJoão Eurico Fonseca
João Eurico Fonseca
Objectives: To describe our experience with a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak within a large rheumatology department, early in the pandemic. Methods: Symptomatic and asymptomatic healthcare workers (HCWs) had a naso-oropharyngeal swab for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and were followed clinically. Reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) was repeated to document cure, and serological response was assessed. Patients with risk contacts within the department in the 14 days preceding the outbreak were screened for COVID-19 symptoms. Results: 14/34 HCWs (41%; 40±14 years, 71% female) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 11/34 (32%) developed symptoms but were RT-PCR-negative. Half of RT-PCR-positive HCWs did not report fever, cough, or dyspnoea before testing, which were absent in 3/14 cases (21%). Mild disease prevailed (79%), but 3 HCWs had moderate disease requiring further assessment, which excluded severe complications. Nevertheless, symptom duration (28±18 days), viral shedding (31±10 days post-symptom onset, range 15-51) and work absence (29±28 days) were prolonged. 13/14 (93%) of RT-PCR-positive and none of the RT-PCR-negative HCWs had a positive humoral response, with higher IgG-index in individuals over 50 years (14.5±7.7 vs 5.0±4.4, p=0.012). Of 617 rheumatic patients, 8 (1.3%) developed COVID-19 symptoms (1/8 hospitalisation, 8/8 complete recovery), following a consultation/procedure with an asymptomatic (7/8) or mildly-symptomatic (1/8) HCW. Conclusions: A COVID-19 outbreak can occur among HCWs and rheumatic patients, swiftly spreading over the presymptomatic stage. Mild disease without typical symptoms should be recognised, and may evolve with delayed viral shedding, prolonged recovery, and adequate immune response in most individuals. Key messages: High infection rates have been reported in healthcare workers (HCWs) dealing with COVID-19 patients. Less is known about potential transmission by pre/asymptomatic carriers, which may be important in the context of rheumatology practice, among both HCWs and patients. A COVID-19 outbreak in a rheumatology department affected 41% of HCWs, with fast spreading throughout the presymptomatic stage. Mild disease without typical symptoms was common, especially in early phases, evolving with delayed viral shedding (unto 51 days), prolonged recovery (average one month), and adequate immune response (93%) in most individuals. Transmission by mostly asymptomatic HCWs occurred to a minority of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), who had a globally favourable outcome. Asymptomatic and mild disease forms among HCWs should be recognised. Assertive infection control measures and testing strategies are warranted to prevent subclinical contagion between HCWs and patients with RMDs.