AI-powered chatbots have spread to various fields including dental education and clinical assistance to treatment planning. The aim of this study is to assess and compare leading AI-powered chatbot performances in dental specialization exam (DUS) administered in Turkey and compare it with the best performer of that year. DUS questions for 2020 and 2021 were directed to ChatGPT-4.0 and Gemini Advanced individually. DUS questions were manually entered into AI-powered chatbot in their original form, in Turkish. The results obtained were compared with each other and the year’s best performers. Candidates who score at least 45 points on this centralized exam are deemed to have passed and are eligible to select their preferred department and institution. The data was statistically analyzed using Pearson’s chi-squared test (p < 0.05). ChatGPT-4.0 received 83.3% correct response rate on the 2020 exam, while Gemini Advanced received 65% correct response rate. On the 2021 exam, ChatGPT-4.0 received 80.5% correct response rate, whereas Gemini Advanced received 60.2% correct response rate. ChatGPT-4.0 outperformed Gemini Advanced in both exams (p < 0.05). AI-powered chatbots performed worse in overall score (for 2020: ChatGPT-4.0, 65,5 and Gemini Advanced, 50.1; for 2021: ChatGPT-4.0, 65,6 and Gemini Advanced, 48.6) when compared to overall scores of the best performer of that year (68.5 points for year 2020 and 72.3 points for year 2021). This poor performance also includes the basic sciences and clinical sciences sections (p < 0.001). Additionally, periodontology was the clinical specialty in which both AI-powered chatbots achieved the best results, the lowest performance was determined in the endodontics and orthodontics. AI-powered chatbots, namely ChatGPT-4.0 and Gemini Advanced, passed the DUS by exceeding the threshold score of 45. However, they still lagged behind the top performers of that year, particularly in basic sciences, clinical sciences, and overall score. Additionally, they exhibited lower performance in some clinical specialties such as endodontics and orthodontics.

Objective: In recent years the social media offers a handy platform for patients who want to receive medical information. The aim of this study is to assess the content of YouTube as an information source on space maintainers and to evaluate the efficiency of videos by parents and patients. Methods and findings: YouTube was searched for information using two keywords ‘space maintainer’ and ‘space maintainers in pediatric dentistry’. Two dentists reviewed the first 200 videos for each search term. After exclusions, 52 videos were included for analysis. Demographics of videos, including the type of source, date of upload, length, viewers’ interaction and viewing rate were evaluated. The overall usefulness of videos was scored according to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Guideline based on 9-point scales. The mean usefulness score of evaluated videos was 4,4 ± 1,5 (range 1–8). There was a significant correlation between usefulness and video length (p<0,05). But there was no significant correlation between usefulness and other demographics. Most videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals (51.9%). Videos uploaded by individual users were less useful compared with videos uploaded by healthcare professionals or organizations. Most of the videos (88,5%) used representative images for visualizing. Conclusions: YouTube videos about space maintainers are useful for parents only to understand and visualize their function. However, it does not provide sufficient information about adverse effects and types of them. Dentists should warn their patients that videos on the internet may contain incorrect and limited information.

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is the most recent infectious disease that is spreading rapidly throughout the world. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and awareness levels of dentists on COVID-19. This survey study, consisting of 37 questions, was sent to dentists via an online link in the first two weeks of April 2020. The questionnaire consisted of questions related to the knowledge level of dentists on COVID-19 during the pandemic period. The knowledge level of dentists was assessed with a 24-point scoring, consisting of correct answers. A Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative data (p < 0.05). A total of 267 dentists participated in this study, of which 51.7% were aged under 30 years, and 67% were women. The participants’ knowledge level means score was 19.03 ± 3.15. According to these results, 231 were determined (86.5%) as high knowledgeable. Positive associations between increased knowledge level and factors such as being a woman, working in a university hospital, and being informed outside the institution were determined. The knowledge level of the dentists working in Istanbul about the COVID-19 pandemic is quite high.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of parental presence on dental anxiety in children during dental treatments. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 194 children between January-April, 2020. The children were randomly divided into two subgroups. Children in group-I were treated in parent’s presence (pp), and in group-II in parent’s absence (pa). The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS) and The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were used for subjective measurements, whereas the objective measurement was performed by measuring the heart rate. Results: The mean age of 194 children was 6.26 ± 1.15 years, ranging from 5-8 years of age. The mean MDAS score of all children was 15.1 ± 4.72. No significant correlations were found in terms of dental anxiety between the children’s gender and age with heart rate, WBFPS and MDAS scores. Preoperative WBFPSscores (6.83 ± 1.04 pp and 7.01 ± 0.93 pa) were higher than postoperative scores (5.34 ± 2.11 pp and 5.74 ± 2.04 pa), with no statistically significant difference. Although there was no statistically significant results, the paediatric dentist observed a deterioration in the children’s behavior throughout the sessions in group-II compared to children in group-I. Conclusions: Parental presence has no statistically significant effect on dental anxiety in children during dental treatments.

Objectives: The management of deep caries lesions in immature permanent molars might be challenging in clinical practice. Minimally invasive caries removal methods can maintain apexogenesis by preventing extensive tissue loss. Here we compare the chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) gel and the polymer bur in terms of time spent on caries removal, patient acceptability, and clinical success. Materials and Methods: The teeth of 30 children were randomly divided into two groups. The duration of each method, the level of cooperation during each method, and the child’s choice of caries removal method were recorded. Patients were followed at 6-month intervals for at least 2 years. Results: The difference between the patients’ preferences was not statistically significant, while the average caries removal time of the polymer bur method was significantly shorter (p < 0.05). The rates of apical closure without pathology in CMCR and polymer bur groups were 63.2% and 73.7%, respectively, whereas 10% of each group underwent further treatments due to the clinical and/or radiographic pathology. Conclusions: These methods were thought to serve as an interim treatment in managing immature permanent teeth with deep caries. Furthermore, these methods, which do not involve water cooling, can also minimize the risk of contamination and cross-infection.

Aim: Antibiotics are often prescribed for the treatment of various infec-tions and prophylactic purposes in dental practice. Their improper use can cause microbial resistance to antibiotics, which poses a world-wide threat. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of dentists and dentistry students about anti-biotic prescription practices for prophylaxis and the treatment of dental infections in pediatric patients.Methods: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 2,100 dentists and 300 senior dentistry students. The questionnaire was filled out by the par tic-ipants within a 2-month period (May-June 2020). A 30-point scoring system was developed to assess the knowledge levels of the dentists according to the guidelines. Descriptive statistical analyses were per-formed. One-way ANOVA test and the Chi-Squared test were used to compare qualitative variables.Results: The response rate was found to be 24.2% for dentists and 49% for senior dentistry students. 19.4% of the participants were found to be moderately knowledgeable and 80.6% of them were highly know-ledgeable. Students' knowledge scores were found to be higher than the general dentists and other specialists (p<0.05). There was no sig-nificant difference between students and pedodontists. Conclusion: Dentists were found to have sufficient knowledge about the usage of antibiotics in children, but there is still a lack of information about circumstances under which antibiotics should not be prescribed. Dentists and dentistry students should attend continuing education programs to keep their information up-to-date and should also prescribe antibiotics in adherence with the current guidelines to prevent antibiotic resistance.