Eduardo Zimmer

Dr. Eduardo Zimmer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 January 2017 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EZEduardo Zimmer
Eduardo Zimmer
MPMaxime J Parent
Maxime J Parent
DSDébora G Souza
Débora G Souza
ALAntoine Leuzy
Antoine Leuzy
CLClotilde Lecrux
Clotilde Lecrux
PRPedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto
The identity of the cell types contributing to the [18F]FDG positron emission tomography signal remain highly controversial. In this study, the authors demonstrate that activating glutamate astrocytic transport increases brain [18F]FDG uptake. These findings indicate that astrocytes may also impact [18F]FDG positron emission tomography signal. Contributions of glial cells to neuroenergetics have been the focus of extensive debate. Here we provide positron emission tomography evidence that activation of astrocytic glutamate transport via the excitatory amino acid transporter GLT-1 triggers widespread but graded glucose uptake in the rodent brain. Our results highlight the need for a reevaluation of the interpretation of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography data, whereby astrocytes would be recognized as contributing to the [18F]FDG signal.

1 February 2019 in Trends in Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStephen F. Carter
Stephen F. Carter
KHKarl Herholz
Karl Herholz
PRPedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto
LPLuc Pellerin
Luc Pellerin
ANagneta nordberg
agneta nordberg
EZEduardo Zimmer
Eduardo Zimmer

31 August 2023 in Nature Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WBWagner S. Brum
Wagner S. Brum
NCNicholas C. Cullen
Nicholas C. Cullen
SJShorena Janelidze
Shorena Janelidze
NANicholas J. Ashton
Nicholas J. Ashton
EZEduardo Zimmer
Eduardo Zimmer
OHOskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson
Cost-effective strategies for identifying amyloid-β (Aβ) positivity in patients with cognitive impairment are urgently needed with recent approvals of anti-Aβ immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Blood biomarkers can accurately detect AD pathology, but it is unclear whether their incorporation into a full diagnostic workflow can reduce the number of confirmatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET) tests needed while accurately classifying patients. We evaluated a two-step workflow for determining Aβ-PET status in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from two independent memory clinic-based cohorts (n = 348). A blood-based model including plasma tau protein 217 (p-tau217), age and APOE ε4 status was developed in BioFINDER-1 (area under the curve (AUC) = 89.3%) and validated in BioFINDER-2 (AUC = 94.3%). In step 1, the blood-based model was used to stratify the patients into low, intermediate or high risk of Aβ-PET positivity. In step 2, we assumed referral only of intermediate-risk patients to CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 testing, whereas step 1 alone determined Aβ-status for low- and high-risk groups. Depending on whether lenient, moderate or stringent thresholds were used in step 1, the two-step workflow overall accuracy for detecting Aβ-PET status was 88.2%, 90.5% and 92.0%, respectively, while reducing the number of necessary CSF tests by 85.9%, 72.7% and 61.2%, respectively. In secondary analyses, an adapted version of the BioFINDER-1 model led to successful validation of the two-step workflow with a different plasma p-tau217 immunoassay in patients with cognitive impairment from the TRIAD cohort (n = 84). In conclusion, using a plasma p-tau217-based model for risk stratification of patients with MCI can substantially reduce the need for confirmatory testing while accurately classifying patients, offering a cost-effective strategy to detect AD in memory clinic settings.

29 April 2019 in Molecular Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LMLiana M. de Medeiros
Liana M. de Medeiros
MBMarco A. De Bastiani
Marco A. De Bastiani
EREduardo P. Rico
Eduardo P. Rico
PSPatrícia Schonhofen
Patrícia Schonhofen
BPBianca Pfaffenseller
Bianca Pfaffenseller
FKFábio Klamt
Fábio Klamt

15 June 2021 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BBBruna Bellaver
Bruna Bellaver
JFJoão Pedro Ferrari-Souza
João Pedro Ferrari-Souza
LRLucas Uglione da Ros
Lucas Uglione da Ros
SCStephen F. Carter
Stephen F. Carter
ERElena Rodriguez-Vieitez
Elena Rodriguez-Vieitez
EZEduardo Zimmer
Eduardo Zimmer
Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether fluid and imaging astrocyte biomarkers are altered in Alzheimer9s disease (AD). Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for articles reporting fluid or imaging astrocyte biomarkers in AD. Pooled effect sizes were determined with mean differences (SMD) using the Hedge’s G method with random-effects to determine biomarker performance. Adapted questions from QUADAS-2 were applied for quality assessment. A protocol for this study has been previously registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020192304). Results: The initial search identified 1,425 articles. After exclusion criteria were applied, 33 articles (a total of 3,204 individuals) measuring levels of GFAP, S100B, YKL-40 and AQP4 in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as MAO-B, indexed by positron emission tomography 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl ([11C]-DED), were included. GFAP (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.71-1.18) and YKL-40 (SMD = 0.76; CI 95% = 0.63-0.89) levels in the CSF, S100B levels in the blood (SMD = 2.91; CI 95% = 1.01-4.8) were found significantly increased in AD patients. Conclusions: Despite significant progress, applications of astrocyte biomarkers in AD remain in their early days. The meta-analysis demonstrated that astrocyte biomarkers are consistently altered in AD and supports further investigation for their inclusion in the AD clinical research framework for observational and interventional studies.

8 July 2014 in Journal of Neuroinflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EZEduardo Zimmer
Eduardo Zimmer
ALAntoine Leuzy
Antoine Leuzy
ABAndréa Lessa Benedet
Andréa Lessa Benedet
JBJohn Breitner
John Breitner
SGSerge Gauthier
Serge Gauthier
PRPedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been reconceptualized as a dynamic pathophysiological process, where the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) is thought to trigger a cascade of neurodegenerative events resulting in cognitive impairment and, eventually, dementia. In addition to Aβ pathology, various lines of research have implicated neuroinflammation as an important participant in AD pathophysiology. Currently, neuroinflammation can be measured in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) with ligands targeting diverse biological processes such as microglial activation, reactive astrocytes and phospholipase A2 activity. In terms of therapeutic strategies, despite a strong rationale and epidemiological studies suggesting that the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce the prevalence of AD, clinical trials conducted to date have proven inconclusive. In this respect, it has been hypothesized that NSAIDs may only prove protective if administered early on in the disease course, prior to the accumulation of significant AD pathology. In order to test various hypotheses pertaining to the exact role of neuroinflammation in AD, studies in asymptomatic carriers of mutations deterministic for early-onset familial AD may prove of use. In this respect, PET ligands for neuroinflammation may act as surrogate markers of disease progression, allowing for the development of more integrative models of AD, as well as for the measuring of target engagement in the context of clinical trials using NSAIDs. In this review, we address the biological basis of neuroinflammatory changes in AD, underscore therapeutic strategies using anti-inflammatory compounds, and shed light on the possibility of tracking neuroinflammation in vivo using PET imaging ligands.