Daniela Cirnatu

Dr. Daniela Cirnatu

Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
EPElena Narcisa Pogurschi
Elena Narcisa Pogurschi
CPCarmen Daniela PETCU
Carmen Daniela PETCU
AMAlexandru Eugeniu Mizeranschi
Alexandru Eugeniu Mizeranschi
Corina Aurelia ZugravuCorina Aurelia Zugravu
Corina Aurelia Zugravu
DCDaniela Cirnatu
Daniela Cirnatu
MGMargarita Ghimpeteanu
Margarita Ghimpeteanu
Considering the major limitations of the latest studies conducted in Romania on the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAPs) of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, we conducted this study to assess this major public health threat. A cross-sectional survey based on a validated questionnaire was conducted among the general population of Romania for a period of 5 months, i.e., September 2021–January 2022. The questionnaire was distributed using Google Form and it covered demographic characteristics and KAP assessments consisting of 12 items on knowledge, 10 items on attitudes and 3 items on practices. Latent class analyses (LCAs) were conducted to group respondents based on their responses. The response rate was 77%, of which females responded in a greater number (n = 1251) compared to males (n = 674). For most of the respondents (67.32%, n = 1296), the education level was high school, while 23.58% (n = 454) of respondents were college graduates. One in three Romanians (33.3%) know the WHO predictions related to this topic. Overall, the Romanian population is less disciplined when it comes to completing antibiotic treatments, as 29.19% of the respondents stop the course of antibiotic administration if their symptoms improve. The key findings from the present study may help policy makers in designing targeted interventions to decrease confusion, ambiguity or misconceptions about antibiotic use.

7 March 2024 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAda Meda Bugi
Ada Meda Bugi
IJIulius Juganaru
Iulius Juganaru
RIRaluca Isac
Raluca Isac
ISIulia Elena Simina
Iulia Elena Simina
AMAndrei-Ioan Munteanu
Andrei-Ioan Munteanu
OMOtilia Marginean
Otilia Marginean
Food neophobia (FN), the fear of sampling new foods, can have a significant impact on children’s eating habits. Children with phenylketonuria (PKU), a hereditary condition that inhibits the body’s capacity to metabolize phenylalanine, should take this attitude with caution. Patients with PKU must follow a rigorous phenylalanine (Phe)-restricted diet to avoid brain malfunction that can include intellectual disability, seizures, and behavioral difficulties. The novelty of our work stems from the fact that we explored the origins of this incorrect intake pattern, which exacerbates PKU patients’ already fragile health. We conducted a cross-sectional study on 34 previously diagnosed phenylketonuria patients and a control group ranging in age from 7 months to 40 years, with a sex ratio of M/F 2:1. The Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) was used to determine neophobia. We used JASP (version 0.18.1) statistical analysis to examine the relationship between neophobia and PKU condition, age and nutritional status at the time of study, diet compliance, parental educational level, period from birth to PKU diagnosis, and environmental (rural/urban) provenience of PKU patients. According to the data, 61.76% of patients with PKU were neophobic, as were 70.57% of the control group. Food neophobia was associated with PKU patients’ present age, the period from birth to PKU diagnosis, and parental educational level.

13 September 2022 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNenssy Georgiana Horga
Nenssy Georgiana Horga
DCDaniela Cirnatu
Daniela Cirnatu
Nilima Rajpal KundnaniNilima Rajpal Kundnani
Nilima Rajpal Kundnani
ECElena Ciurariu
Elena Ciurariu
SPSimona Parvu
Simona Parvu
SMStelian Ioan Morariu
Stelian Ioan Morariu
The management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania has included the involvement of not only the medical system, but also that of the administrative and social services. All these organizations are working together to lower the impact on the health of the general population, to increase the health system’s response capabilities and even to diminish the negative effects upon the economy due to the epidemic’s length. Therefore, non-pharmacological measures (NPMs) imposed through restrictive measures (administrative, economic and individual) have influenced the evolution of morbidity and mortality. Even from the first months of the pandemic’s progression, researchers have shown the impact of the NPMs’ existence, as there were many studies on all NPMs in conjunction, as well as those targeting specific measures such as school closures. Our study started by establishing a temporal relationship between the non-pharmacological measures found in most countries (wearing a mask, washing hands and physical distancing, limiting economic activities, closing schools, limiting internal and international movement, banning public and private events in closed spaces) and the evolution of the pandemic in Romania. The degree of novelty brought by this study consists of extending the analysis to the pre-existing state of the health system and to the measures meant to increase the resilience of the population, as well as to the measures aimed at reducing the type of risk, and factors that can equally influence the evolution of the number of cases. The results of the statistical analysis show the important effects of certain NPMs (mask mandates, online schooling, decisions regarding imposing or lifting local restrictions) as well as the reduced impact of other measures (hand disinfection, social distancing or the restriction of public and private events). Hence, it can be concluded that during such pandemics, implementing quick, simple measures can prevent the spread of the disease and help fight the contagion in a better manner.

24 April 2024 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAda Meda Bugi
Ada Meda Bugi
IJIulius Juganaru
Iulius Juganaru
ISIulia Elena Simina
Iulia Elena Simina
DNDelia-Maria Nicoara
Delia-Maria Nicoara
CLCristun I Lucian
Cristun I Lucian
OMOtilia Marginean
Otilia Marginean
Food neophobia involves avoiding new foods due to reluctance, aversion, or disgust. The Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) is the most reliable and common adult food neophobia test. It helps compare food neophobia across cultures by being translated into numerous languages. This study adapted, translated, and validated the FNS for Romania. This translated version was piloted in November 2023 on 59 students in the medical field from two distinct Romanian cities. Between December 2023 and February 2024, 375 adults were surveyed, representing Romania’s population within a 90% confidence interval. The average age of responders was 38.07 years, with a standard deviation of 10.75 and a 4:1 female-to-male sex ratio. The Cronbach’s alpha test was used to validate the questionnaire. Our study found that the mean FNS value was 31.86; most Romanian respondents (69.20%) were neutral towards trying new foods, with a significant portion being neophobes (18.21%) outnumbering neophiles (12.59%). When compared to international study results, Romanian adults, on average, exhibited a higher percentage of neophobes compared to those in Korea (13%), Hungary (16.8%), Italy (17%), and Brazil (17.5%), but a lower percentage than those in Lebanon (21.5%). The findings indicate that the translated scale can be utilized to assess neophobia among Romanian speakers.

28 July 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMElena Moroșan
Elena Moroșan
ELElena Carmen Lupu
Elena Carmen Lupu
Mititelu MagdalenaMititelu Magdalena
Mititelu Magdalena
Adina Magdalena MusucAdina Magdalena Musuc
Adina Magdalena Musuc
ARAndreea Ioana Rusu
Andreea Ioana Rusu
ADAdriana Daraban
Adriana Daraban
Among the cultivated plants of great interest at the planetary level, soy and pea can be highlighted. Soy represents a major source of protein and oil, with exceptional and widely accepted qualities in most cultures and religions. It is also a very good substitute for animal protein, having significant amounts of essential amino acids. Peas, although less cultivated than soybeans, contain large amounts of protein and carbohydrates, and they are also a source of food used in many diets due to their high nutritional content. The present study focuses on the nutrient composition analysis of five soybean varieties and four pea varieties grown in Romania for their use in food in the most efficient way. Protein dosage was carried out using Bradford and Kjeldahl methods, and the amino acids were dosed using gas chromatography. It was demonstrated that the analyzed varieties are rich in nutrients with different content depending on their type. Among the soybean hybrid varieties analyzed, the beans from the early Ovidiu F type and the semi-early Anduța F stood out for their increased content of lipids (23.28%) and proteins with increased biological value, and in the case of the pea beans, those from the Evelina F (22.21%) varieties of the Afila and Spectral F autumn types presented the highest content of proteins (21.06%) and essential amino acids (16.87%). All the obtained results offer a theoretical foundation for the advanced and balanced application of different varieties of soybean and pea bean in a balanced diet.

1 July 2023 in International Journal of General Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
I(Irina Maria Stefan (Popescu)
Irina Maria Stefan (Popescu)
Madalin-Marius MarganMadalin-Marius Margan
Madalin-Marius Margan
MAMariana Anghel
Mariana Anghel
AMAlexandra Mocanu
Alexandra Mocanu
SLSorina Maria Denisa Laitin
Sorina Maria Denisa Laitin
AAAndrei Anghel
Andrei Anghel
Purpose: Coronavirus disease is a global pandemic with millions of confirmed cases and hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide that continues to create a significant burden on the healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to determine the patient clinical and paraclinical profiles that associate with COVID-19 unfavourable outcome and generate a prediction model that could separate between high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients and Methods: The present study is a multivariate observational retrospective study. A total of 483 patients, residents of the municipality of Timișoara, the biggest city in the Western Region of Romania, were included in the study group that was further divided into 3 sub-groups in accordance with the disease severity form. Results: Increased age (cOR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.06– 1.11, p< 0.001), cardiovascular diseases (cOR=3.37, 95% CI: 1.96– 6.08, p< 0.001), renal disease (cOR=4.26, 95% CI: 2.13– 8.52, p< 0.001), and neurological disorder (cOR=5.46, 95% CI: 2.71– 11.01, p< 0.001) were all independently significantly correlated with an unfavourable outcome in the study group. The severe form increases the risk of an unfavourable outcome 19.59 times (95% CI: 11.57– 34.10, p< 0.001), while older age remains an independent risk factor even when disease severity is included in the statistical model. An unfavourable outcome was positively associated with increased values for the following paraclinical parameters: white blood count (WBC; cOR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.05– 1.15, p< 0.001), absolute neutrophil count (ANC; cOR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.09– 1.21, p< 0.001) and C-reactive protein (CRP; cOR=1.007, 95% CI: 1.004– 1.009, p< 0.001). The best prediction model including age, ANC and CRP achieved a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.845 (95% CI: 0.813– 0.877, p< 0.001); cut-off value = 0.12; sensitivity = 72.3%; specificity = 83.9%. Conclusion: This model and risk profiling may contribute to a more precise allocation of limited healthcare resources in a clinical setup and can guide the development of strategies for disease management.