William G. Meikle

Dr. William G. Meikle

Carl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 June 2014 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
William G. MeikleWilliam G. Meikle
William G. Meikle
Niels HolstNiels Holst
Niels Holst
Monitoring physical variables associated with honeybee colonies, including weight, temperature, humidity, respiratory gases, vibration, sound, and forager traffic, in a continuous manner is becoming feasible for most researchers as the cost and size of electronic sensors decrease while their precision and capacity increase. Researchers have taken different approaches to collecting and analyzing the resulting datasets, with a view toward extracting information on colony behavior and phenology. The objective of this review is to examine critically the different kinds of data and data analyses, providing researchers with better-informed options for obtaining information on colony phenology in the field without disturbing the hive, and for combining information from different kinds of sensors to obtain a more complete picture of colony status. Wireless sensor networks and powering sensors are briefly discussed.

1 January 2012 in Journal of Apicultural Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VDVincent Dietemann
Vincent Dietemann
JPJochen Pflugfelder
Jochen Pflugfelder
DADenis Anderson
Denis Anderson
JCJean-Daniel Charrière
Jean-Daniel Charrière
NCNor Chejanovsky
Nor Chejanovsky
PNPeter Neumann
Peter Neumann
SummaryPollination by honey bees plays a key role in the functioning of ecosystems and optimisation of agricultural yields. Severe honey bee colony losses worldwide have raised concerns about the sustainability of these pollination services. In many cases, bee mortality appears to be the product of many interacting factors, but there is a growing consensus that the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor plays the role of the major predisposing liability. We argue that the fight against this mite should be a priority for future honey bee health research. We highlight the lack of efficient control methods currently available against the parasite and discuss the need for new approaches. Gaps in our knowledge of the biology and epidemiology of the mite are identified and a research road map towards sustainable control is drawn. Innovative and challenging approaches are suggested in order to stimulate research efforts and ensure that honey bees will be able to sustainably fulfil their role in the ecosystem. ResumenLa polinización por las abejas melíferas tiene una importante relevancia en el funcionamiento de los ecosistemas y en la optimización de los rendimientos agrícolas. Se ha expresado la preocupación acerca de la sostenibilidad de estos servicios de polinización, debido a las graves pérdidas de colonias de abejas melíferas a nivel mundial. En varios de estos casos, la pérdida de estas abejas parece ser el resultado de la interacción de muchos factores, existiendo un creciente consenso en que el ácaro ectoparásito Varroa destructor desempeña alguna responsabilidad predisponente. Proponemos que la lucha contra éste ácaro debe ser una prioridad para futuras investigaciones relacionadas con la salud de las abejas. Resaltamos la actual necesidad de contar con métodos de control eficientes contra éste parásito y discutimos también la necesidad de nuevos enfoques. Se identificó la falta de conocimiento acerca de la biología y epidemiología del ácaro y se propuso una ruta de investigación para su control sost...

1 July 2019 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TCThéotime Colin
Théotime Colin
William G. MeikleWilliam G. Meikle
William G. Meikle
XWXiaobo Wu
Xiaobo Wu
ABAndrew B. Barron
Andrew B. Barron
There is increasing worldwide concern about the impacts of pesticide residues on honey bees and bee colony survival, but how sublethal effects of pesticides on bees might cause colony failure remains highly controversial, with field data giving very mixed results. To explore how trace levels of the neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid impacted colony foraging performance, we equipped bees with RFID tags that allowed us to track their lifetime flight behavior. One group of bees was exposed to a trace concentration (5 μg/kg, ppb) of imidacloprid in sugar syrup while in the larval stage. The imidacloprid residues caused bees to start foraging when younger as adults and perform fewer orientation flights, and reduced their lifetime foraging flights by 28%. The magnitude of the effects of a trace imidacloprid concentration delivered only during larval stage highlights the severity of pesticide residues for bee foraging performance. Our data suggest that neonicotinoids could impact colony function by imbalancing the normal age based division of labor in a colony and reducing foraging efficiency. Understanding this mechanism will help the development of interventions to safeguard bee colony health.

20 March 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VRVincent Ricigliano
Vincent Ricigliano
BMBrendon M. Mott
Brendon M. Mott
PMPatrick W. Maes
Patrick W. Maes
AFAmy S. Floyd
Amy S. Floyd
WFWilliam Fitz
William Fitz
Kirk E. AndersonKirk E. Anderson
Kirk E. Anderson
Honey bee colony performance and health are intimately linked to the foraging environment. Recent evidence suggests that the US Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) has a positive impact on environmental suitability for supporting honey bee apiaries. However, relatively little is known about the influence of habitat conservation efforts on honey bee colony health. Identifying specific factors that influence bee health at the colony level incorporates longitudinal monitoring of physiology across diverse environments. Using a pooled-sampling method to overcome individual variation, we monitored colony-level molecular biomarkers during critical pre- and post-winter time points. Major categories of colony health (nutrition, oxidative stress resistance, and immunity) were impacted by apiary site. In general, apiaries within foraging distance of CRP lands showed improved performance and higher gene expression of vitellogenin (vg), a nutritionally regulated protein with central storage and regulatory functions. Mirroring vg levels, gene transcripts encoding antioxidant enzymes and immune-related proteins were typically higher in colonies exposed to CRP environments. Our study highlights the potential of CRP lands to improve pollinator health and the utility of colony-level molecular diagnostics to assess environmental suitability for honey bees.

1 November 2008 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
William G. MeikleWilliam G. Meikle
William G. Meikle
Brian G. RectorBrian G. Rector
Brian G. Rector
GMGuy Mercadier
Guy Mercadier
Niels HolstNiels Holst
Niels Holst

17 May 2017 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
William G. MeikleWilliam G. Meikle
William G. Meikle
MWMilagra Weiss
Milagra Weiss
PMPatrick W. Maes
Patrick W. Maes
WFWilliam Fitz
William Fitz
LSLucy A. Snyder
Lucy A. Snyder
KAKirk E. Anderson
Kirk E. Anderson
Internal temperatures of honey bee hives kept at different sites in North Dakota were monitored before and during winter to evaluate the effects of treatment, in the form of exposure to commercial pollination, and location on colony health. In October, hives exposed to commercial pollination during the summer had fewer adult bees and less brood than hives kept near natural forage, as well as lower average temperatures throughout winter. Within-day temperature variability was higher among hives exposed to commercial agriculture than for those kept near natural forage, indicating reduced temperature control. Fungicides, insecticides, varroacides, and an herbicide were detected in bee bread and wax samples; no major differences were observed either in the diversity or in the concentrations of agrochemicals with the exception of chlorpyrifos at one site. Varroa and Nosema densities were low overall. Data from the same site used in successive years showed significantly more brood the first year, as well as lower temperature variability; high levels of chlorpyrifos were detected in bee bread of colonies in the second year. Colony average temperature and temperature variability were informative with respect to colony phenology and post-winter status.