Pierre Smith

Pierre Smith


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 September 2021 in Journal of Emergency Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSarah Butera
Sarah Butera
NBNatacha Brasseur
Natacha Brasseur
NFNataly Filion
Nataly Filion
ABArnaud Bruyneel
Arnaud Bruyneel
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith

12 May 2022 in Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHelena Bruggeman
Helena Bruggeman
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith
FBFinaba Berete
Finaba Berete
SDStefaan Demarest
Stefaan Demarest
LHLize Hermans
Lize Hermans
LGLydia Gisle
Lydia Gisle
The COVID-19 pandemic and policy measures enacted to contain the spread of the coronavirus have had nationwide psychological effects. This study aimed to assess the impact of the first 15 months of the COVID-19 pandemic on the level of anxiety (GAD-7 scale) and depression (PHQ-9 scale) of the Belgian adult population. A longitudinal study was conducted from April 2020 to June 2021, with 1838 respondents participating in 6 online surveys. Linear mixed models were used to model the associations between the predictor variables and the mental health outcomes. Results showed that the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression was higher in times of stricter policy measures. Furthermore, after the initial stress from the outbreak, coping and adjustment were observed in participants, as symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased during times of lower policy restrictions to almost the same level as in pre-COVID times (2018). Though time trends were similar for all population subgroups, higher levels of both anxiety and depression were generally found among women, young people, people with poor social support, extraverts, people having pre-existing psychological problems, and people who were infected/exposed to the COVID-19 virus. Therefore, investment in mental health treatment programs and supports, especially for those risk groups, is crucial.

13 July 2020 in Global Health Action
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAshley Moore
Ashley Moore
JLJoris Adriaan Frank Van Loenhout
Joris Adriaan Frank Van Loenhout
MAMaria Moitinho de Almeida
Maria Moitinho de Almeida
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith
DGDebarati Guha-Sapir
Debarati Guha-Sapir
The effects of disasters and conflicts are widespread and heavily studied. While attention to disasters' impacts on mental health is growing, mental health effects are not well understood due to inconsistencies in measurement. The purpose of this study is to review mental health assessment tools and their use in populations affected by disasters and conflicts. Tools that assess posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, substance use disorder, and general mental health were examined. This review began with a search for assessment tools in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. Next, validation studies for the tools were obtained through snowball sampling. A final search was conducted for scientific studies using the selected tools in humanitarian settings to collect the data for analysis. The benefits and limitations described for each tool were compiled into a complete table. Twelve assessment tools were included, with 88 studies using them. The primary findings indicate that half of the studies used the Impact of Events Scale-Revised. The most common limitation discussed is that self-report tools inaccurately estimate the prevalence of mental health problems. This inaccuracy is further exacerbated by a lack of cultural appropriateness of the tools, as many are developed for Western contexts. It is recommended that researchers and humanitarian workers reflect on the effectiveness of the mental health assessment tool they use to accurately represent the populations under study in emergency settings. In addition, mental health assessment should be coupled with action.

10 November 2021 in International Journal of Nursing Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFilip Haegdorens
Filip Haegdorens
EFErik Franck
Erik Franck
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith
ABArnaud Bruyneel
Arnaud Bruyneel
KMKoenraad G. Monsieurs
Koenraad G. Monsieurs
PBPeter Van Bogaert
Peter Van Bogaert

27 July 2023 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith
RPRobby De Pauw
Robby De Pauw
DCDieter Van Cauteren
Dieter Van Cauteren
SDStefaan Demarest
Stefaan Demarest
SDSabine Drieskens
Sabine Drieskens
RCRana Charafeddine
Rana Charafeddine
Background: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, most research has focused on the acute phase of COVID-19, yet some people experience symptoms beyond, referred to as post COVID-19 conditions (PCC). However, evidence on PCC and its impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is still scarce. This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 and PCC on HRQoL. Methods: This is a longitudinal cohort study of the Belgian adult population with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 5,727 people were followed up between the time of their infection and three months later. HRQoL was measured with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire before and during the infection and three months later. Linear mixed regression models were built to assess the longitudinal association between participants’ characteristics and the evolution of their HRQoL. Results: This study found a significant decline in HRQoL during the SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to the situation before (β=-9.91, 95%CI=-10.13;-9.85), but no clinically important difference three months after the infection compared to the situation before, except among people reporting PCC (β=-11.15, 95%CI=-11.72;-10.51). The main symptoms of PCC with a significant negative impact on the different dimensions of HRQoL were fatigue/exhaustion (21%), headache (11%), memory problems (10%), shortness of breath (9%), and joint (7%) or muscle pain (6%). The dimension of HRQoL most negatively affected by several PCC symptoms was pain/discomfort. Conclusions: With the growing number of people infected with SARS-CoV-2, PCC and its impact on HRQoL are becoming important public health issues. To allow people with PCC to recover and to limit its detrimental impact on HRQoL, it is essential to manage its various heterogeneous symptoms using a multidisciplinary approach.

14 May 2020 in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPierre Smith
Pierre Smith
PNPablo Nicaise
Pablo Nicaise
DGDomenico Giacco
Domenico Giacco
VBVictoria Jane Bird
Victoria Jane Bird
MBMichael Bauer
Michael Bauer
VLvincent lorant
vincent lorant
Purpose: Long lengths of stay (LoS) in psychiatric hospitals or repeated admission may affect the social integration of patients with psychiatric disorders. So far, however, studies have been inconclusive. This study aimed to analyse whether long LoS or repeated admissions in psychiatric wards were associated in different ways with changes in the social integration of patients. Methods: Within a prospective cohort study, data were collected on 2181 patients with a main ICD-10 diagnosis of psychotic, affective, or anxiety disorder, hospitalised in the UK, Italy, Germany, Poland, and Belgium in 2015. Social integration was measured at baseline and 1 year after admission using the SIX index, which includes four dimensions: employment, housing, family situation, and friendship. Regression models were performed to test the association between LoS, the number of admissions, and the change in social integration over the study period, controlling for patients’ characteristics (trial registration ISRCTN40256812). Results: A longer LoS was significantly associated with a decrease in social integration (β = − 0.23, 95%CI − 0.32 to − 0.14, p = 0.03), particularly regarding employment (OR = 2.21, 95%CI 1.18–3.24, p = 0.02), housing (OR = 3.45, 95%CI 1.74–5.16, p < 0.001), and family situation (OR = 1.94, 95%CI 1.10–2.78, p = 0.04). In contrast, repeated admissions were only associated with a decrease in friendship contacts (OR = 1.15, 95CI% 1.08–1.22, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Results suggest that a longer hospital LoS is more strongly associated with a decrease in patients’ social integration than repeated admissions. Special attention should be paid to helping patients to find and retain housing and employment while hospitalised for long periods.