: Nanotechnology is one of the most important modern sciences that has integrated all sectors of science. Nanotechnology has been applied in the agricultural sector in the last ten years in pursuit of increasing agricultural production and ensuring food security. Plant biotechnology is an essential science that is concerned with plant production. The use of nanotechnology in plant biotechnology under controlled conditions has facilitated the understanding of important internal mechanisms of the plant biological system. The application of nanoparticles (NPs) in plant biotechnology has demonstrated an interesting impact on in vitro plant growth and development. This includes the positive effect of the NPs on micropropagation, callus induction, somatic embryogenesis, cell suspension culture, and plant disinfection. In addition, other biotechnology processes, including the genetic transformation of plants, plant conservation, and secondary metabolite production have improved by the use of NPs. Furthermore, nanotechnology is used to improve plant tolerance to different stress conditions that limit plant production. In this review article, we attempt to consolidate the achievements of nanotechnology and plant biotechnology and discuss advances in the applications of nanotechnology in plant biotechnology. It has been concluded that more research is needed to understand the mechanism of nanoparticle delivery and translocation in plants in order to avoid any future hazardous effects of nanomaterials. This will be key to the achievement of magnificent progress in plant nanobiotechnology.

Callus and microshoot cultures were established for Chiliadenus montanus (Vhal.) Brullo. (Asteraceae), a medicinal plant known for producing volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Callus induction was achieved successfully by culturing leaf explants on full-strength Murashige and Skoog medium (MS) supplemented with 2.2 µM 2, 4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) and 6.9 µM kinetin (Kin). Successful direct shoot regeneration was achieved using nodal explants cultured onto half-strength MS media supplemented with 1.4 μM Gibberellic Acid (GA₃) and 4.4 μM 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP). Indirect microshoots were successfully regenerated using callus cultured on MS media supplemented with 8.8 μM BAP, 2.2 μM Zeatin, and 1.4 μM GA₃ followed by culturing on MS media supplemented with 8.8 μM BAP and 0.5 μM naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). Using wild plant aerial parts, callus and microshoots samples, VOCs were extracted successfully using Headspace Solid-Phase Micro-Extraction (HS-SPME) and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). In wild plant extracts, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons were found to be predominant with the following principal components: Alloaromadendrene (11.92%), trans-Cadina-1(6),4-diene (7.54%), and α-caryophyllene (6.77%). The analysis of in vitro microshoots revealed high levels of oxygenated monoterpenes with cis-Myrtanol (16.62%), and β-Cyclocitral (14.3%) as the main components. Callus extract was dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons and the main compounds identified were (Z)-β-Ocimene (22.27%), p-Cymene (15.13%), and α-pinene (13.78%). In conclusion, an efficient in vitro production system of VOCs in C. montanus was established that can be used in the future for boosting their production without endangering wild plants.

In vitro preservation of transgenic tomato lines overexpressing the stress-responsive transcription factor SlAREB1 was studied by using slow growth and cryopreservation techniques. Slow growth preservation was performed by using different concentrations of sucrose (0, 100, 200, 300 mm) and abscisic acid (0, 4, 8, 12 μm) in Murashige and Skoog (MS) media, while cryopreservation was conducted by using encapsulation dehydration, V-cryoplates and seeds. Significant differences were observed between tested lines grown on MS media supplemented with 200 mm sucrose where transgenic lines overexpressing SlAREB1 showed improved growth when compared with negative control. The addition of abscisic acid (ABA) to the preservation media affected negatively transgenic lines growth and development when compared with ABA-free media. In encapsulation dehydration, non-cryopreserved transgenic lines overexpressing SlAREB1 pretreated in 0.8 M sucrose for 1 day and subjected to different dehydration periods showed significantly higher survival percentages when compared with negative control. For V-cryoplates technique, cryopreserved transgenic lines overexpressing SlAREB1 treated in 0.3 M sucrose for 3 days with or without cold acclimatization showed significantly higher survival percentages when compared with the negative control. Seed cryopreservation was performed successfully with a clear reduction in germination percentage in transgenic lines overexpressing high levels of SlAREB1. In conclusion, transgenic tomato lines overexpressing SlAREB1 were found to improve tolerance against different abiotic stresses associated with different in vitro preservation protocols.