Lijun Wu

Dr. Lijun Wu

Institute of Environmental Physics and Technology, Anhui University, Qingyuan Campus 111, Jiulong Road, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2023 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTingting Du
Tingting Du
XYXiang Yu
Xiang Yu
SSSong Shao
Song Shao
TLTong Li
Tong Li
SXShengmin Xu
Shengmin Xu
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu

1 September 2005 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BHBurong Hu
Burong Hu
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu
WHWei Han
Wei Han
LZLeilei Zhang
Leilei Zhang
SCShaopeng Chen
Shaopeng Chen
ZYZengliang Yu
Zengliang Yu
Bystander effects induced by low dose of ionizing radiation have been shown to widely exist in many cell types and may have a significant impact on radiation risk assessment. Though many studies have been reported on this phenomenological observation, the mechanisms underlying this process are not clear, especially on the questions of how soon after irradiation the bystander effects can be initiated and how far this bystander signal can be propagated once it is started. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation or carcinogenic chemicals can be visualized in situ using γ-H2AX immunofluorescent staining. Our previous studies have shown that in situ visualization of DSBs could be used to assess irradiation-induced extranuclear/extracellular (bystander) effect at an early stage after irradiation. In the present studies, we used this method to investigate the time and spatial effects of damage signals on unirradiated bystander cells. The results showed that increased DSBs in irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas could be visualized 2 min after radiation and reached its maximum 30 min after radiation. The average levels of DSB formation at 30 min post-1cGy irradiation in the irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas were 3-fold and 2-fold higher than those of the sham-irradiated control cells, respectively. Afterwards, the formation of DSBs declined with incubation time and remained steady for at least 6 h at a level that was statistically higher than their controls. The results also showed that the bystander signal derived from irradiated cells could be transferred to anywhere in the dish and the percentage of DSBs in the unirradiated bystander cells was not dependent on the dose delivered. Moreover, the fraction of DSB positive cells in unirradiated bystander areas showed a time-dependent increase based on its distance to the irradiated area at very early stage post-irradiation. Both lindane and DMSO significantly suppressed the yield of DSBs in the cells of unirradiated bystander areas, which suggest that gap junctional intercellular communication and reactive oxygen species played important roles in the induction of the bystander effects, both in irradiated and unirradiated bystander areas.

17 March 2007 in Plant Growth Regulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJingnan Liu
Jingnan Liu
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu
SWShenglin Wei
Shenglin Wei
XXXiang Xiao
Xiang Xiao
CSCaixin Su
Caixin Su
ZYZengliang Yu
Zengliang Yu

4 November 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XLXun Luo
Xun Luo
SXShengmin Xu
Shengmin Xu
YYYaning Yang
Yaning Yang
LLLuzhi Li
Luzhi Li
SCShaopeng Chen
Shaopeng Chen
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu
Previous studies have indicated that engineered nanomaterials can be transferred through the food chain. However, their potential ecotoxicity to the environment is not fully understood. Here, we systematically evaluated the physiological behavior and toxicity of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-coated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using a food chain model from Escherichia coli (E. coli) to Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Our results demonstrated that AgNPs accumulated in E. coli could be transferred to the C. elegans, and AgNPs were clearly distributed in the gut lumen, subcutaneous tissue and gonad. After being transferred to C. elegans through the food chain, the accumulated AgNPs caused serious toxicity to the higher trophic level (C. elegans), including effects on germ cell death, reproductive integrity and life span. Relative to larger particles (75 nm), small AgNPs (25 nm) more easily accumulated in the food chain and exhibited a stronger toxicity to the higher trophic level. More importantly, both the AgNPs that had accumulated in C. elegans through the food chain and the resulting impairment of germ cells could be transferred to the next generation, indicating that AgNP can cause genetic damage across generations. Our findings highlight that nanomaterials pose potential ecotoxicity to ecosystems via transport through the food chain.

13 October 2016 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XXXiang Xiao
Xiang Xiao
WZWen-Wen Zhu
Wen-Wen Zhu
QLQiu-Yue Liu
Qiu-Yue Liu
HYHang Yuan
Hang Yuan
WLWen-Wei Li
Wen-Wei Li
HYHan-Qing Yu
Han-Qing Yu

1 January 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYaning Yang
Yaning Yang
SXShengmin Xu
Shengmin Xu
GXGuangmin Xu
Guangmin Xu
RLRui Liu
Rui Liu
AXAn Xu
An Xu
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu