Adam Simon

Prof. Adam Simon

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2011 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJohn L. Muntean
John L. Muntean
JCJean S. Cline
Jean S. Cline
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
ALAnthony A. Longo
Anthony A. Longo

1 February 2012 in Ore Geology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TPThomas Pettke
Thomas Pettke
FOFelix Oberli
Felix Oberli
AAAndreas Audétat
Andreas Audétat
MGMarcel Guillong
Marcel Guillong
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
LKLeonhard M. Klemm
Leonhard M. Klemm

1 December 2015 in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJaayke L. Knipping
Jaayke L. Knipping
LBLaura D. Bilenker
Laura D. Bilenker
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
Martin ReichMartin Reich
Martin Reich
FBFernando Barra
Fernando Barra
RMRodrigo Munizaga
Rodrigo Munizaga

1 July 2015 in Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJaayke L. Knipping
Jaayke L. Knipping
LBLaura D. Bilenker
Laura D. Bilenker
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
Martin ReichMartin Reich
Martin Reich
FBFernando Barra
Fernando Barra
RMRodrigo Munizaga
Rodrigo Munizaga
Kiruna-type iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits are an important source of Fe ore, and two radically different processes are being actively investigated for their origin. One hypothesis invokes direct crystallization of immiscible Fe-rich melt that separated from a parent silicate magma, while the other hypothesis invokes deposition of Fe-oxides from hydrothermal fluids of either magmatic or crustal origin. Here, we present a new model based on Fe and O stable isotopes and trace and major element geochemistry data of magnetite from the ∼350 Mt Fe Los Colorados IOA deposit in the Chilean iron belt that merges these divergent processes into a single sequence of events that explains all characteristic features of these curious deposits. We propose that concentration of magnetite takes place by the preferred wetting of magnetite, followed by buoyant segregation of these early-formed magmatic magnetite-bubble pairs, which become a rising magnetite suspension that deposits massive magnetite in regional-scale transcurrent faults. Our data demonstrate an unambiguous magmatic origin, consistent with the namesake IOA analogue in the Kiruna district, Sweden. Further, our model explains the observed coexisting purely magmatic and hydrothermal-magmatic features and allows a genetic connection between Kiruna-type IOA and iron oxide–copper–gold deposits, contributing to a global understanding valuable to exploration efforts.

8 April 2016 in Economic Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Martin ReichMartin Reich
Martin Reich
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
ADArtur Deditius
Artur Deditius
FBFernando Barra
Fernando Barra
SCStephen Chryssoulis
Stephen Chryssoulis
RMRodrigo Munizaga
Rodrigo Munizaga

1 January 2011 in Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAdam Simon
Adam Simon
EREdward M. Ripley
Edward M. Ripley
This chapter focuses on S in porphyry-type ore deposits, layered-mafic-intrusion-hosted ore bodies, and magmatic sulfide deposits. Porphyry-type ore deposits, e.g., Bingham Canyon, Utah, U.S.A. and Grasberg, Irian Jaya, are important hosts of Cu, Mo, Au, and Ag. Ore deposits hosted in layered mafic intrusions, e.g., the Bushveld and Stillwater complexes, contain significant quantities of Ni, Cu, Cr, Au and the platinum group elements (PGE: Pt, Pd, Rh, Re, Ir, Ru). Magmatic sulfide deposits, differentiated from layered mafic intrusions in that the former evince more clearly a role for immiscible sulfide accumulation without the possible presence of an aqueous fluid(s), e.g.,...