Oleg V. Markov

Dr. Oleg V. Markov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2019 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OMOleg V. Markov
Oleg V. Markov
AOAnastasiya Oshchepkova
Anastasiya Oshchepkova
NMNadezhda Mironova
Nadezhda Mironova
Dendritic cell (DC)-based anti-tumour vaccines have great potential for the treatment of cancer. To date, a large number of clinical trials involving DC-based vaccines have been conducted with a view to treating tumours of different histological origins. However, DC-based vaccines had several drawbacks including problems with targeted delivery of tumour antigens to DCs and prolong storage of cellular vaccines. Therefore, the development of other immunotherapeutic approaches capable of enhancing the immunogenicity of existing DC-based vaccines or directly triggering anti-tumour immune responses is of great interest. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released by almost all types of eukaryotic cells for paracrine signaling. EVs can interact with target cells and change their functional activity by delivering different signaling molecules including mRNA, non-coding RNA, proteins, and lipids. EVs have potential benefits as natural vectors for the delivery of RNA and other therapeutic molecules targeted to DCs, T-lymphocytes, and tumour cells; therefore, EVs are a promising entity for the development of novel cell-free anti-tumour vaccines that may be a favourable alternative to DC-based vaccines. In the present review, we discuss the anti-tumour potential of EVs derived from DCs, tumours, and other cells. Methods of EV isolation are systematised, and key molecules carried by EVs that are necessary for the activation of a DC-mediated anti-tumour immune response are analysed with a focus on the RNA component of EVs. Characteristics of anti-tumour immune responses induced by EVs in vitro and in vivo are reviewed. Finally, perspectives and challenges with the use of EVs for the development of anti-tumour cell-free vaccines are considered.

1 September 2015 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOleg V. Markov
Oleg V. Markov
NMNadezhada L. Mironova
Nadezhada L. Mironova
ESElena Shmendel
Elena Shmendel
RSRoman N. Serikov
Roman N. Serikov
NMNina G. Morozova
Nina G. Morozova
MZMarina Zenkova
Marina Zenkova

1 June 2012 in Journal of Controlled Release
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOleg V. Markov
Oleg V. Markov
NMNadezhada L. Mironova
Nadezhada L. Mironova
MMMikhail Maslov
Mikhail Maslov
IPIvan A. Petukhov
Ivan A. Petukhov
NMNina G. Morozova
Nina G. Morozova
MZMarina A. Zenkova
Marina A. Zenkova

1 February 2018 in European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTatyana O. Kabilova
Tatyana O. Kabilova
ESElena Shmendel
Elena Shmendel
DGDaniil Gladkikh
Daniil Gladkikh
ECElena L. Chernolovskaya
Elena L. Chernolovskaya
OMOleg V. Markov
Oleg V. Markov
MZMarina Zenkova
Marina Zenkova

1 July 2013 in Cell Cycle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNadezhada L. Mironova
Nadezhada L. Mironova
IPIrina Petrushanko
Irina Petrushanko
OPOlga Patutina
Olga Patutina
ASAexandra V. Sen’kova
Aexandra V. Sen’kova
OSOlga V. Simonenko
Olga V. Simonenko
AMAlexander Makarov
Alexander Makarov
Exogenous ribonucleases are known to inhibit tumor growth via apoptosis induction in tumor cells, allowing to consider them as promising anticancer drugs for clinical application. In this work the antitumor potential of binase was evaluated in vivo and the mechanism of cytotoxic effect of binase on tumor cells was comprehensively studied in vitro. We investigated tumoricidal activity of binase using three murine tumor models of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), lymphosarcoma RLS40 and melanoma B-16. We show for the first time that intraperitoneal injection of binase at a dose range 0.1–5 mg/kg results in retardation of primary tumor growth up to 45% in LLC and RLS40 and inhibits metastasis up to 50% in LLC and RLS40 and up to 70% in B-16 melanoma. Binase does not exhibit overall toxic effect and displays a general systemic and immunomodulatory effects. Treatment of RLS40-bearing animals with binase together with polychemotherapy revealed that binase decreases the hepatotoxicity of polychemotherapy while maintaining its antitumor effect. It was demonstrated that the cytotoxic effect of binase is realized via the induction of the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Activation of intrinsic apoptotic pathway is manifested by a drop of mitochondrial potential, increase in calcium concentration and inhibition of respiratory activity. Subsequent synthesis of TNF-α in the cells under the action of binase triggers extrinsic apoptotic pathway through the binding of TNF with cell-death receptors and activation of caspase 8. Thus binase is a potential anticancer therapeutics inducing apoptosis in cancer cells.

1 September 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOleg V. Markov
Oleg V. Markov
NMNadezhada L. Mironova
Nadezhada L. Mironova
SSSergey V. Sennikov
Sergey V. Sennikov
VVValentin Vlassov
Valentin Vlassov
MZMarina Zenkova
Marina Zenkova
Recent data on the application of dendritic cells (DCs) as anti-tumor vaccines has shown their great potential in therapy and prophylaxis of cancer. Here we report on a comparison of two treatment schemes with DCs that display the models of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination using three different experimental tumor models: namely, Krebs-2 adenocarcinoma (primary tumor), melanoma (B16, metastatic tumor without a primary node) and Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC, metastatic tumor with a primary node). Dendritic cells generated from bone marrow-derived DC precursors and loaded with lysate of tumor cells or transfected with the complexes of total tumor RNA with cationic liposomes were used for vaccination. Lipofectamine 2000 and liposomes consisting of helper lipid DOPE (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine) and cationic lipid 2D3 (1,26-Bis(1,2-de-O-tetradecyl-rac-glycerol)-7,11,16,20-tetraazahexacosan tetrahydrocloride) were used for RNA transfection. It was shown that DCs loaded with tumor lysate were ineffective in contrast to tumor-derived RNA. Therapeutic vaccination with DCs loaded by lipoplexes RNA/Lipofectamine 2000 was the most efficient for treatment of non-metastatic Krebs-2, where a 1.9-fold tumor growth retardation was observed. Single prophylactic vaccination with DCs loaded by lipoplexes RNA/2D3 was the most efficient to treat highly aggressive metastatic tumors LLC and B16, where 4.7- and 10-fold suppression of the number of lung metastases was observed, respectively. Antimetastatic effect of single prophylactic DC vaccination in metastatic melanoma model was accompanied by the reductions in the levels of Th2-specific cytokines however the change of the levels of Th1/Th2/Th17 master regulators was not found. Failure of double prophylactic vaccination is explained by Th17-response polarization associated with autoimmune and pro-inflammatory reactions. In the case of therapeutic DC vaccine the polarization of Th1-response was found nevertheless the antimetastatic effect was less effective in comparison with prophylactic DC vaccine.