Background: To assess the effectiveness of China's medicine and health care reform in promoting equity in health care utilization among rural residents, it is necessary to analyze temporal trends in equity in health care utilization among rural residents in China. This study is the first to assess horizontal inequity trends in health care utilization among rural Chinese residents from 2010 to 2018 and provides evidence for improving government health policies. Methods: Longitudinal data obtained from China Family Panel Studies from 2010 to 2018 were used to determine trends in outpatient and inpatient utilization. Concentration index, concentration curve, and horizontal inequity index were calculated to measure inequalities. Decomposition analysis was applied to measure the contribution of need and non-need factors to the unfairness. Results: From 2010 to 2018, outpatient utilization among rural residents increased by 35.10%, while inpatient utilization increased by 80.68%. Concentration indices for health care utilization were negative in all years. In 2012, there was an increase in the concentration index for outpatient utilization (CI = -0.0219). The concentration index for inpatient utilization decreased from -0.0478 in 2010 to -0.0888 in 2018. Except for outpatient utilization in 2012 (HI = 0.0214), horizontal inequity indices for outpatient utilization were negative in all years. The horizontal inequity index for inpatient utilization was highest in 2010 (HI = -0.0068) and lowest in 2018 (HI = -0.0303). The contribution of need factors to the inequity exceeded 50% in all years. Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2018, low-income groups in rural China used more health services. This seemingly pro-poor income-related inequality was due in large part to the greater health care need among low-income groups. Government policies aimed at increasing access to health services, particularly primary health care had helped to make health care utilization in rural China more equitable. It is necessary to design better health policies for disadvantaged groups to reduce future inequities in the use of health services by rural populations.

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence is rapidly permeating the field of psychiatry. It offers novel avenues for the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of mental health disorders. This structured review aims to consolidate current approaches to the application of AI in telepsychiatry. In addition, it evaluates their technological maturity, clinical utility, and ethical–legal robustness. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for the period spanning 2015 to 2025. The selection and analysis processes adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The final synthesis included 44 publications, among which 14 were empirical studies encompassing a broad spectrum of algorithmic approaches—ranging from neural networks and natural language processing (NLP) to multimodal architectures. Results: The review revealed a wide array of AI applications in telepsychiatry, encompassing automated diagnostics, therapeutic support, predictive modeling, and risk stratification. The most actively employed techniques include natural language and speech processing, multimodal analysis, and advanced forecasting models. However, significant barriers to implementation persist—ethical (threats to autonomy and risks of algorithmic bias), technological (limited generalizability and a lack of explainability), and legal (ambiguous accountability and weak regulatory frameworks). Conclusions: This review underscores a growing disconnect between the rapid evolution of AI technologies and the institutional maturity of tools suitable for scalable clinical integration. Despite notable technological advances, the clinical adoption of AI in telepsychiatry remains limited. The analysis identifies persistent methodological gaps and systemic barriers that demand coordinated efforts across research, technical, and regulatory communities. It also outlines key directions for future empirical studies and interdisciplinary development of implementation standards.

Background: In recent years, due to the increasing number of cross-regional medical patients, countries around the world have issued a series of policies or regulations to reduce their out-of-pocket burden. In this context, this study intended to explore the impact of the Spatio-temporal characteristics of cross-regional medical treatment on total medical expenses, medical insurance payments, and out-of-pocket expenses of patients with malignant tumors in low-income areas. Methods: This study included 54,904 data of cross-provincial medical treatment of malignant tumor patients insured in Heilongjiang Province, China in 2020. Firstly, Microsoft Excel 2019 and ArcGIS 10.2 were applied to conduct a descriptive analysis of the Spatio-temporal characteristics of their cross-provincial medical treatment. Then, binary and multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the specific impact of economic level and geographical distance of medical regions on total medical expenses, medical insurance payments, and out-of-pocket expenses. Results: The number of cross-regional medical patients showed a gradual upward trend from February to December, and fell back in January. They were concentrated in regions with high economic level and short distance from the insured region, where were more likely to form the group with high out-of-pocket expenses (AOR = 3.620, P < 0.001; AOR = 1.882, P < 0.001). While this possibility in middle-distance medical regions were less (AOR = 0.545, P < 0.001). Afterwards, two sensitivity analysis methods showed that the results were robust. Conclusion: The number of cross-regional medical patients with malignant tumors in low-income areas is affected by seasonal factors, meanwhile, their total medical expenses, actual medical insurance payment levels, and out-of-pocket expenses are all affected by the economic level and geographical distance of medical regions. And the middle-distance medical regions may be the best choice for patients with planned cross-regional medical treatment. These provide some evidence for policymakers to improve the fairness and sustainability of medical security for cross-regional medical patients and reduce their direct economic burden of disease.

Background: Rural residents' participation in medical insurance has a significant relationship to the affordability of their medical care. This study aims to investigate the willingness of rural residents to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents and its determinants so as to enhance their willingness to participate in medical insurance.Methods: Data were obtained from 1,077 validated questionnaires from rural residents. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression analysis were adopted to analyze determinants of rural residents' willingness to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents.Results: 94.3% of respondents were willing to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents and this was associated with the familiarity with the medical insurance policies [OR = 2.136, 95% CI (1.143, 3.989)], the reasonability of medical insurance premiums [OR = 2.326, 95% CI (0.998, 5.418)], the normality of doctors' treatment behavior [OR = 3.245, 95% CI (1.339, 7.867)] and the medical insurance's effectiveness in reducing the economic burden of disease [OR = 5.630, 95% CI (2.861, 11.079)].Conclusion: Even though most respondents were willing to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents, some aspects need to be improved. The focus should be on promoting and regulating the behavior of medical staff. Financing policies and reimbursement of treatment costs need to be more scientifically developed. A comprehensive basic healthcare system needs to be optimized around the core function of “hedging financial risks”.

Introduction: Young and middle-aged people are important participants in the fight against health insurance fraud. The study aims to investigate the differences in their willingness to report health insurance fraud and the factors influencing it when it occurs in familiar or unfamiliar healthcare settings. Methods: Data were obtained from a validated questionnaire from 828 young and middle-aged people. McNemar’s test was used to compare the public’s willingness to report under the two scenarios. Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the determinants of individuals’ willingness to report health insurance fraud in different scenarios. Results: Young and middle-aged people were more likely to report health insurance fraud in a familiar healthcare setting than in an unfamiliar one (McNemar’s χ²=26.51, P < 0.05). Their sense of responsibility for maintaining the security of the health insurance fund, the government’s openness about fraud cases, and the perception of their ability to report had significant positive effects on the public’s willingness to report in both settings (P < 0.05). In a familiar healthcare setting, the more satisfied the public is with government measures to protect whistleblowers, the more likely they are to report (OR = 1.44, P = 0.025). Those who perceive the consequences of health insurance fraud to be serious are more likely to report than those who perceive the consequences to be less serious (OR = 1.61, P = 0.042). Conclusion: Individuals are more likely to report health insurance fraud in familiar healthcare settings than in unfamiliar ones, in which their awareness of the severity of the consequences of health insurance fraud and their perceived risk after reporting it play an important role. The government’s publicizing of fraud cases and enhancing the public’s sense of responsibility and ability to maintain the safety of the health insurance fund may be a way to increase their willingness to report, regardless of whether they are familiar with the healthcare setting or not.