Hen Y Sela

Dr. Hen Y Sela

Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Southern, Israel
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIrit Manaster
Irit Manaster
SMSaar Mizrahi
Saar Mizrahi
DGDebra Goldman-Wohl
Debra Goldman-Wohl
Hen Y SelaHen Y Sela
Hen Y Sela
NSNoam Stern-Ginossar
Noam Stern-Ginossar
SHSela Hy
Sela Hy
NK cells populate the human endometrium before pregnancy. Unlike decidual NK cells that populate the decidua during pregnancy, the NK cells present in the human endometrium, before pregnancy, have not been fully characterized. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the origin, phenotype, and function of endometrial NK cells (eNK). We show that eNK cells have a unique receptor repertoire. In particular, they are negative for NKp30 and chemokine receptor expression, which distinguishes them from any other NK subset described so far. We further show that eNK cells lack NK-specific functional phenotype and activity such as cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity, before IL-15 stimulation. Following such stimulation, endometrial NK cells acquire phenotype and function that are similar to those of decidual NK cells. We therefore suggest that eNK cells are inactive cells (before IL-15 activation and in relation to the known NK activity) that are present in the endometrium before conception, waiting for pregnancy.

1 October 2012 in Resuscitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sharon EinavSharon Einav
Sharon Einav
NKNechama Kaufman
Nechama Kaufman
Hen Y SelaHen Y Sela
Hen Y Sela

1 July 2021 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOfer Beharier
Ofer Beharier
RMRomina Plitman Mayo
Romina Plitman Mayo
TRTal Raz
Tal Raz
KSKira Nahum Sacks
Kira Nahum Sacks
LSLetizia Schreiber
Letizia Schreiber
MKMichal Kovo
Michal Kovo
The significant risks posed to mothers and fetuses by COVID-19 in pregnancy have sparked a worldwide debate surrounding the pros and cons of antenatal SARS-CoV-2 inoculation, as we lack sufficient evidence regarding vaccine effectiveness in pregnant women and their offspring. We aimed to provide substantial evidence for the effect of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine versus native infection on maternal humoral, as well as transplacentally acquired fetal immune response, potentially providing newborn protection. A multicenter study where parturients presenting for delivery were recruited at 8 medical centers across Israel and assigned to 3 study groups: vaccinated (n = 86); PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected during pregnancy (n = 65), and unvaccinated noninfected controls (n = 62). Maternal and fetal blood samples were collected from parturients prior to delivery and from the umbilical cord following delivery, respectively. Sera IgG and IgM titers were measured using the Milliplex MAP SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Panel (for S1, S2, RBD, and N). The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine elicits strong maternal humoral IgG response (anti-S and RBD) that crosses the placenta barrier and approaches maternal titers in the fetus within 15 days following the first dose. Maternal to neonatal anti-COVID-19 antibodies ratio did not differ when comparing sensitization (vaccine vs. infection). IgG transfer ratio at birth was significantly lower for third-trimester as compared with second trimester infection. Lastly, fetal IgM response was detected in 5 neonates, all in the infected group. Antenatal BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination induces a robust maternal humoral response that effectively transfers to the fetus, supporting the role of vaccination during pregnancy. Israel Science Foundation and the Weizmann Institute Fondazione Henry Krenter.

6 October 2021 in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMisgav Rottenstreich
Misgav Rottenstreich
Hen Y SelaHen Y Sela
Hen Y Sela
R0Reut Rotem (ORCID - 0000-0002-4063-5911)
Reut Rotem (ORCID - 0000-0002-4063-5911)
EKEla Kadish
Ela Kadish
YWYonit Wiener-Well
Yonit Wiener-Well
SGSorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Objective: To evaluate the impact of Covid‐19 vaccination (Pfizer–BioNTech BNT162b2) during the third trimester of pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes.Design: A multicentre, retrospective computerised database.Population: Women who gave birth at >24 weeks of gestation in Israel, between January and April 2021, with full records of Covid‐19 disease and vaccination status.Methods: Women who received two doses of the vaccine were compared with unvaccinated women. Women who were recorded as having disease or a positive Covid‐19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swab during pregnancy or delivery were excluded from both study groups. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate logistic regression.Main outcome measures: Composite adverse maternal outcomes. Secondary outcomes were vaccination rate and composite adverse neonatal outcomes.Results: The overall uptake of one or both vaccines was 40.2%; 712 women who received two doses of the Covid‐19 vaccine were compared with 1063 unvaccinated women. Maternal composite outcomes were comparable between the groups; however, women who received the vaccine had higher rates of elective caesarean deliveries (CDs) and lower rates of vacuum deliveries. An adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Covid‐19 vaccination was not associated with maternal composite adverse outcome (aOR 0.8, 95% CI 0.61–1.03); a significant reduction in the risk for neonatal composite adverse outcomes was observed (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.36–0.74).Conclusions: In a motivated population covered by a National Health Insurance Plan, we found a 40.2% rate of vaccination for the Covid‐19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, which was not associated with adverse maternal outcomes and, moreover, decreased the risk for neonatal adverse outcomes.Tweetable Covid‐19 vaccine during pregnancy is safe for both mother and fetus.

15 September 2005 in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJim Jadaon
Jim Jadaon
ASAsher Shushan
Asher Shushan
YEYossef Ezra
Yossef Ezra
Hen Y SelaHen Y Sela
Hen Y Sela
COCuneyt Ozcan
Cuneyt Ozcan
NRNathan Rojansky
Nathan Rojansky

1 September 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHila Hochler
Hila Hochler
MLMichal Lipschuetz
Michal Lipschuetz
YSYael Suissa-Cohen
Yael Suissa-Cohen
AWAri Weiss
Ari Weiss
Hen Y SelaHen Y Sela
Hen Y Sela
MRMisgav Rottenstreich
Misgav Rottenstreich
The aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to examine the impact of maternal age on perinatal outcomes in multiparas, stratified according to maternal age in one- and two-year increments. The analysis involved 302,484 multiparas who delivered between the years 2003 and 2021 in four university-affiliated obstetrics departments. Maternal age was considered both as a continuous variable and in two-year intervals, as compared with a comparison group of parturients aged 25–30 years. The study focused on cesarean delivery and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission as primary outcomes. The findings revealed that cesarean delivery rates increased as maternal age advanced, with rates ranging from 6.7% among 25–30 year olds, rising continuously from 13.5% to 19.9% between the age strata of 31 and 42, to exceeding 20% among those aged ≥ 43 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25–30 year old group). Similarly, NICU admission rates rose from 2.7% in the comparison group to 6% in parturients aged 45–46 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25–30 year old group). The study highlights the association between incrementally advanced maternal age and increased rates of maternal and neonatal complications, necessitating global awareness of these implications for family planning decisions and maternal care.