Objective Synthesise evidence on production of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human milk of individuals who had COVID-19, and antibodies’ ability to neutralise SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Design A systematic review of studies published from 1 December 2019 to 16 February 2021 without study design restrictions. Setting Data were sourced from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CNKI, CINAHL and WHO COVID-19 database. Search was also performed through reviewing references of selected articles, Google Scholar and preprint servers. Studies that tested human milk for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were included. Patients Individuals with COVID-19 infection and human milk tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies. Main outcome measures The presence of neutralising antibodies in milk samples provided by individuals with COVID-19 infection. Results Individual participant data from 161 persons (14 studies) were extracted and re-pooled. Milk from 133 (82.6%) individuals demonstrated the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM and/or IgG. Illness severity data were available in 146 individuals; 5 (3.4%) had severe disease, 128 (87.7%) had mild disease, while 13 (8.9%) were asymptomatic. Presence of neutralising antibodies in milk from 20 (41.7%) of 48 individuals neutralised SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro. Neutralising capacity of antibodies was lost after Holder pasteurisation but preserved after high-pressure pasteurisation. Conclusion Human milk of lactating individuals after COVID-19 infection contains anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG, IgM and/or IgA, even after mild or asymptomatic infection. Current evidence demonstrates that these antibodies can neutralise SARS-CoV-2 virus in vitro. Holder pasteurisation deactivates SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, while high-pressure pasteurisation preserves the SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA function.

Gut microbiome dysbiosis contributes to the pathophysiology of both gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and its associated adverse outcomes in the woman and offspring. Even though GDM prevalence, complications, and outcomes vary among different ethnic groups, limited information is available about the influence of ethnicity on gut microbiome dysbiosis in pregnancies complicated by GDM. This pilot prospective cohort study examined the impact of ethnicity on gut dysbiosis in GDM among three Asian ethnic groups (Chinese, Malay, Indian) living in Singapore, and investigated the potential modulatory roles of diet and lifestyle modifications on gut microbiome post-GDM diagnosis. Women with GDM (n = 53) and without GDM (n = 16) were recruited. Fecal samples were collected at 24–28- and 36–40-weeks’ gestation and analyzed by targeted 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analysis was performed to evaluate differences between groups. Differentially abundant taxa were identified by DeSeq2 based analysis. Functional prediction was performed using the phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt2). Among women with GDM, gut microbiome from different ethnicities harbored common microbial features. However, among those without GDM, there was contrasting microbiome composition between ethnic groups. Microbial members such as Collinsella, Blautia, Ruminococcus, Ruminococcus gnavus, Ruminococcus torques, and Eubacterium hallii groups were differentially enriched (p < 0.05) in women with GDM compared to those without. Among women with GDM, no differences in alpha- and beta- diversity were observed when comparing 24–28 weeks’ samples with 36–40 weeks’ samples, a period covering intense dietary and lifestyle modification, suggesting an inability to modulate gut microbiota through classic GDM management. Women with GDM have a distinct gut microbiome profile which harbours common features across different Asian ethnic groups, consistent with the notion that specific microbes are involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, pro-inflammatory conditions, and other metabolic dysregulation known to be present in GDM.

The difference in the incidence of early-onset sepsis caused by group B streptococcus among term neonates whose mothers received first-line vs second-line intrapartum prophylaxis is poorly described. This study aimed to compare the incidence of group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis among term neonates born to mothers who receive first-line, second-line, or no intrapartum antibiotics and to describe the short-term and survival outcomes of neonates who developed group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis stratified by maternal antepartum prophylaxis. This was a retrospective review of electronic medical records. We queried the Pediatrix Medical Group Clinical Data Warehouse to evaluate the outcomes of term neonates born to group B streptococcus positive mothers between 2003 and 2020 and compared the incidence and outcomes of neonates with group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis whose mothers received first-line vs second-line or no intrapartum prophylaxis. Among the 496,180 neonates, 104,196 (21%) were born to mothers who were group B streptococcus positive. Of 97,983 mothers who were group B streptococcus positive with adequate prenatal antibiotic documentation, 49,234 (50%), 12,679 (13%), and 36,070 (37%) received first-line, second-line, and no intrapartum prophylaxis, respectively. The incidence of group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis among all neonates with maternal group B streptococcus carriage was 0.22% (231/104,196). Neonates whose mothers received second-line intrapartum antibiotics and no antibiotics had a higher risk for group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis infection than those whose mothers received first-line intrapartum antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 2.66-6.38 and adjusted odds ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.66-5.44, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk for group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis among neonates born to mothers who received second-line vs no antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.33). Neonates exposed to second-line maternal group B streptococcus prophylaxis had an increased risk for group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis when compared with those exposed to first-line maternal group B streptococcus prophylaxis. There was no statistically significant difference in group B streptococcus early-onset sepsis incidence between second-line antibiotic prophylaxis and no antibiotics in mothers with group B streptococcus carriage.

SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses are engendered in human milk after BNT162b2 vaccination. However, the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) raises concerns about the specificity of and potential cross-protection mediated by milk antibody responses, which are crucial for passive immunity transferred from breastfeeding mothers to their infants. In this study, we collected milk samples at three different time points pre- and post-vaccination, and measured milk IgA antibody binding to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the original Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, and the four VOCs, namely Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta. We report a significant level of anti-RBD IgA in milk collected at 4–6 weeks after the second dose of vaccination compared to pre-vaccination. We observed around a 30% reduction in binding to most VOCs, including the major circulating Delta variant, compared to the original Wuhan-Hu-1 strain. As COVID-19 vaccines may take some time to be approved for infants, these individuals remain at risk for severe disease and rely mainly on transferred passive immunity. Our findings support the current recommendations for vaccinating lactating women with the aim of transferring mucosal immunity to breastfeeding infants.

Background: Vertical transmission of microbes from a mother's gut to their offspring plays a crucial role in the genesis of the early life gut microbiome. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the commonest metabolic disorder during pregnancy, which has adverse short‐ and long‐term effects on both maternal and infant health. We aimed to capture the GDM‐associated biosignatures in infants' gut microbiome from birth to the first 6 weeks of life. Methods: 53 GDM mother‐infant dyads and 16 healthy mother‐infant dyads were recruited. We performed targeted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing on stool samples. Various statistical analyses were performed to understand the changes in the microbiome profile of infants and identify GDM‐associated bacterial biomarkers in mothers and their transfer to infants. Results: GDM altered the gut microbiome of pregnant women as compared to healthy counterparts (PERMANOVA, p .adjusted < 0.05), with predominance of bacterial members associated with insulin resistance, proinflammatory conditions, and other metabolic processes. Infants born to GDM mothers have distinctive early life microbiome (meconium and six weeks stools) compared to infants born to control mothers (PERMANOVA, p .adjusted < 0.05). We also identified the presence of various GDM‐associated microbial signatures such as Blautia and Collinsella in both meconium and one‐month‐old stool samples of infants born to GDM mothers. Conclusion: This study provides a better understanding of the impact of GDM on the seeding of a specific set of microbes during the early life colonization event in the infant gut that increases the risk of inflammatory and metabolic diseases in the future.