Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés

Dr. Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés

Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, The Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya – BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Journal of Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
FBFelipe Buill
Felipe Buill
JMJoaquín Regot Marimón
Joaquín Regot Marimón
AGAndrés de Mesa Gisbert
Andrés de Mesa Gisbert

11 February 2022 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJosep A Gili
Josep A Gili
RRRoger Ruiz-Carulla
Roger Ruiz-Carulla
GMGerard Matas
Gerard Matas
JMJ. Moya
J. Moya
APA. Prades
A. Prades
OMOlga Mavrouli
Olga Mavrouli
Fragmentation is a common feature of rockfall that exerts a strong control on the trajectories of the generated blocks, the impact energies, and the runout. In this paper, we present a set of four real-scale rockfall tests aimed at studying the fragmentation of the rocky blocks, from the global design of the field procedure to the data analysis and the main results. A total of 124 limestone, dacite, or granite blocks ranging between 0.2 and 5 m3 were dropped from different heights (8.5 to 23.6 m) onto four slopes with different shapes (single or double bench) and slope angles (42º to 71º). The characteristics of the blocks, in particular the size, surface texture and joint condition, were measured before the drops. The trajectories of the blocks and both the initial and the impact velocities were tracked and recorded by means of three high-speed video cameras. A total of 200 block-to-ground impacts have been studied. On average, 40% of the blocks broke upon impact on the slope or on the ground, making it necessary to measure the fragments. The initial and final sizes of the blocks/fragments were measured by hand with tape, though photogrammetric techniques (UAV and terrestrial) were also used for comparison purposes. The information gathered during the field tests provides a deep insight into the fragmentation processes. On the one hand, the high-resolution slow-motion videos help to describe when and how the block breakage takes place and the spatial distribution of the pieces. On the other hand, it is possible to compute the block trajectories, the velocities, and the energy losses using videogrammetry. The results include, for instance, a block average fragmentation of 54% and 14% for the limestone and granitoids, respectively; the systematic inventory of the size fragments, which may be used for fitting the power law distributions; and after each breakage, the total angle of aperture occupied by the fragments has been measured, with values in the range 25º–145º. To figure out the different behavior of the blocks in terms of breakage/no breakage, each block-to-ground impact has been characterized with a set of parameters describing the energy level, the robustness of the substrate, and the configuration of the block contact at the impact point, among others. All these terms are combined in a function F, which is used to adjust the field data. The adjustment has been carried out, first, for the whole 200 events and later for a subset of them. The procedure and the results are described in the paper. Although the discrimination capability of F is moderately satisfactory, it is very sensitive to the test site and setup. It must be highlighted that these field tests are a unique source of data to adjust the parameters of the numerical simulation models in use for rockfall studies and risk mitigation, especially when fragmentation during the propagation is considered.

1 December 2013 in Journal of Archaeological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
FBFelipe Buill
Felipe Buill
MEManel Edo
Manel Edo

1 June 2009 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMaria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
FBFelipe Buill
Felipe Buill

1 September 2015 in Journal of Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFelipe Buill
Felipe Buill
MNMaria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
JFJosep M. Puche Fontanilles
Josep M. Puche Fontanilles
JMJosep Maria Macias
Josep Maria Macias
Despite being a well-known monument, the Roman amphitheatre of Tarragona, which is included in theUNESCO World Heritage List, was only fully studied in the late 1980s. The study was therefore subject tothe archaeological research limitations and specific characteristics of that time, as can be seen in the qual-ity of the site’s planimetry. The general planimetry was basically available for relevant sections at a scaleof 1:100 with sufficient accuracy. However, according to current scientific parameters, this planimetryis clearly inadequate, and cannot be used rigorously to obtain comprehensive architectural knowledge.The technical limitations of the time, and the innate difficulties presented by the monument, meant thatonly a few sections were obtained, specifically two, with a low level of detail. This has led to misinterpre-tations, and consequently to dubious or erroneous conclusions. Therefore, the need for complete metricdocumentation is evident, as this will enable us to correctly analyse the monument. We have obtainedmetric documentation by carrying out a topographic survey using digital photogrammetry, which pro-vides us with more information than merely measurements. We can use the three-dimensional modelthat was generated to analyse the sections of the stands and draw conclusions about their geometry.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

1 July 2004 in Marine Geodesy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJ. J. Martinez-Benjamin
J. J. Martinez-Benjamin
MMM. Martinez-Garcia
M. Martinez-Garcia
SLS. Gonzalez Lopez
S. Gonzalez Lopez
MNMaria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
Maria Amparo Núñez-Andrés
FBFelipe Buill
Felipe Buill
LRL. Roblou
L. Roblou
Within the framework of a project comprising part of the Spanish Space Program related to the JASON-1 CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales)/NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) mission, a campaign was conducted from June 9–17, 2003, on the Absolute Calibration Site of the island of Ibiza. The objective was to determine the local marine geoid slope under the ascending (187) and descending (248) Jason-1 ground tracks, in order to allow a better extrapolation of the open-ocean altimetric data with on-shore tide gauge locations, and thereby improve the overall precision of the calibration process. For this we have used a catamaran with two GPS antennas onboard, following the Corsica/Senetosa design ( Bonnefond et al. 2003a Bonnefond, P. , Exertier, P. , Laurain, O. , Menard, Y. , Orsoni, A. , Jeansou, E. , Haines, B. , Kubitschek, D. and Born, G. 2003a. Leveling Sea Surface using a GPS catamaran. Marine Geodesy, 26(3–4): 319–334. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] ). Five GPS reference stations were deployed in order to reduce the distance between the areas covered by the catamaran and the fixed GPS receiver used in the kinematic process. The geodetic activities (e.g., GPS, leveling) have enabled the building of a very accurate (few mm) network in a reference frame compatible with the satellite altimetry missions (ITRF 2000). The GPS kinematic data were processed using two different software programmes, allowing checking of the consistency of the solutions. If the standard deviation of the differences (3.3 cm) is close to the kinematic process precision, they exhibit some large values (up to 14 cm). These large discrepancies have been reduced using a weighting based on the crossover differences. Inasmuch as the distances between the tide gauges and the areas covered by the GPS catamaran were becoming large, we have used the MOG2D ocean model ( Carrère and Lyard 2003 Carrère, L. and Lyard, F. 2003. Modelling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing—comparisons with observations. Geophys. Res. Letters, 30(6) [Google Scholar] ) to correct the sea surface from tides. In the farthest areas, the crossover differences show an improvement by a factor of two. Finally, we also present preliminary results on Jason-1 altimeter calibration using the derived marine geoid. From this analysis, the altimeter bias is estimated to be 120 ± 5 mm. The quality of this first result validates the whole GPS-based marine geoid processing, for which the accuracy is estimated to be better than 3 cm rms at crossovers.