Nataša Erceg

Prof. Dr. Nataša Erceg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2006 in American Journal of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VLVelimir Labinac
Velimir Labinac
Nataša ErcegNataša Erceg
Nataša Erceg
DKDubravka Kotnik-Karuza
Dubravka Kotnik-Karuza
We calculate the magnetic fields of cylindrical coils due to a surface current and a volume current and compare our theoretical results to measured magnetic fields of two coil types: single-layer solenoid and cylindrical thick coil by a simple experimental apparatus. Good agreement is found with the theoretical results.

25 February 2019 in Physical Review Physics Education Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVanes Mešić
Vanes Mešić
KNKnut Neumann
Knut Neumann
IAIvica Aviani
Ivica Aviani
EHElvedin Hasović
Elvedin Hasović
WBWilliam J. Boone
William J. Boone
RRRobert Repnik
Robert Repnik
Even graduate physics students have many misconceptions about basic wave optics phenomena. This suggests that there is much room for improvement of the traditional wave optics curriculum. An effective way for initiating a curriculum change is to reconsider and revise the expected learning outcomes and corresponding assessment instruments. By systematically enriching our wave optics instruction and assessment with conceptual tasks, we may increase the probability of students actively engaging in learning the conceptual aspects of wave optics. In this paper, we present the process of developing an item bank for measuring understanding of wave optics in typical introductory physics courses at universities. Thereby, the Rasch modeling approach has been used. The development of the item bank has been guided by results from multiple expert and student surveys, as well as from group interviews and think aloud interviews. Altogether 65 multiple-choice items with a single correct answer and three distractors have been prepared for field testing. Until now, 35 out of 65 items have been field tested by means of a paper and pencil survey which included 188 participants from five universities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Slovenia. The field test showed that 32 out of 35 items have good psychometric characteristics and that they may be very useful for uncovering students’ misconceptions in wave optics.

10 June 2016 in Physical Review Physics Education Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVanes Mešić
Vanes Mešić
EHErna Hajder
Erna Hajder
KNKnut Neumann
Knut Neumann
Nataša ErcegNataša Erceg
Nataša Erceg
Research has shown that students have tremendous difficulties developing a qualitative understanding of wave optics, at all educational levels. In this study, we investigate how three different approaches to visualizing light waves affect students’ understanding of wave optics. In the first, the conventional, approach light waves are represented by sinusoidal curves. The second teaching approach includes representing light waves by a series of static images, showing the oscillating electric field vectors at characteristic, subsequent instants of time. Within the third approach phasors are used for visualizing light waves. A total of N=85 secondary school students were randomly assigned to one of the three teaching approaches, each of which lasted a period of four class hours. Students who learned with phasors and students who learned from the series of static images outperformed the students learning according to the conventional approach, i.e., they showed a much better understanding of basic wave optics, as measured by a conceptual survey administered to the students one week after the treatment. Our results suggest that visualizing light waves with phasors or oscillating electric field vectors is a promising approach to developing a deeper understanding of wave optics for students enrolled in conceptual level physics courses.

29 December 2015 in Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ivica AvianiIvica Aviani
Ivica Aviani
Nataša ErcegNataša Erceg
Nataša Erceg
VMVanes Mešić
Vanes Mešić
In this study we investigated how two different approaches to drawing free body diagrams influence the development of students’ understanding of Newton’s laws, including their ability to identify real forces. For this purpose we developed a 12-item two-tier multiple choice survey and conducted a quasiexperiment. This experiment included two groups of first-year physics students from Rijeka (RG) (ne=27) and Split (SG) (nc=25) Universities. Students from both groups solved mechanics problems for a period of two class hours. The only difference was that RG students used the superposition of forces approach to solving mechanics problems and in SG the decomposition of forces approach has been used. The ANCOVA (nc=17, ne=17) showed a statistically significant difference in favor of RG, whereby the effect sizes were moderate to large, and the largest differences have been observed in the ability of identifying real forces. Students from the control group (SG) more often exhibited the misconception that forces and their components act on a body independently and simultaneously. Our results support the idea that the practice of resolving forces into the components may not be the most effective way to develop understanding of Newton’s laws and the concept of force.

23 March 2011 in European Journal of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMM Marušić
M Marušić
Nataša ErcegNataša Erceg
Nataša Erceg
JSJ Sliško
J Sliško

16 November 2016 in Physical Review Physics Education Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nataša ErcegNataša Erceg
Nataša Erceg
Ivica AvianiIvica Aviani
Ivica Aviani
VMVanes Mešić
Vanes Mešić
MGMatko Glunčić
Matko Glunčić
GŽGordana Žauhar
Gordana Žauhar
In this study, we investigated students’ understanding of concepts related to the microscopic model of gas. We thoroughly reviewed the relevant literature and conducted think alouds with students by asking them to answer open-ended questions about the kinetic molecular theory of gases. Thereafter, we transformed the open-ended questions into multiple-choice questions, whereby distractors were based on the results of the think alouds. Thus, we obtained a set of 22 questions, which constitutes our current version of the kinetic molecular theory of gases concept inventory. The inventory has been administered to 250 students from different universities in Croatia, and its content validity has been investigated trough physics teacher surveys. The results of our study not only corroborate the existence of some already known student misconceptions, but also reveal new insights about a great spectrum of students’ misconceptions that had not been reported in earlier research (e.g., misconceptions about intermolecular potential energy and molecular velocity distribution). Moreover, we identified similar distribution of students’ responses across the surveyed student groups, despite the fact that they had been enrolled in different curricular environments.