Protein-protein interactions often involve a complex system of intermolecular interactions between residues and atoms at the binding site. A comprehensive exploration of these interactions can help reveal key residues involved in protein-protein recognition that are not obvious using other protein analysis techniques. This paper presents and extends DiffBond, a novel method for identifying and classifying intermolecular bonds while applying standard definitions of bonds in chemical literature to explain protein interactions. DiffBond predicted intermolecular bonds from four protein complexes: Barnase-Barstar, Rap1a-raf, SMAD2-SMAD4, and a subset of complexes formed from three-finger toxins and nAChRs. Based on validation through manual literature search and through comparison of two protein complexes from the SKEMPI dataset, DiffBond was able to identify intermolecular ionic bonds and hydrogen bonds with high precision and recall, and identify salt bridges with high precision. DiffBond predictions on bond existence were also strongly correlated with observations of Gibbs free energy change and electrostatic complementarity in mutational experiments. DiffBond can be a powerful tool for predicting and characterizing influential residues in protein-protein interactions, and its predictions can support research in mutational experiments and drug design.

Protein-protein interactions are essential for various biological processes, including signal transduction, metabolism, vesicle transport, and mitogenic processes. It’s crucial to consider them within the context of their interactions with other proteins to understand protein function. Mutations in proteins can affect their binding affinity to partner proteins by introducing various effects, such as changes in hydrophobic regions, electrostatic interactions, or hydrogen bonds. Assessing the impact of mutations on protein interactions can have implications for disease susceptibility and drug efficacy. Understanding the impact of mutations on protein-protein interactions and predicting binding affinity changes computationally can benefit both basic biology and drug development. Different computational methods offer varying levels of accuracy and efficiency, and the choice of method depends on the specific research goals and available resources. We developed MechPPI, a tool that can use potential mechanism features underlying mutation to predict the binding affinity change upon mutation. We showed MechPPI can accurately predict binding affinity change upon a single mutation, and results demonstrate the potential of MechPPI as a powerful and useful computational tool in protein design and engineering.

This paper presents HBcompare, a method that classifies protein structures according to ligand binding preference categories by analyzing hydrogen bond topology. HBcompare excludes other characteristics of protein structure so that, in the event of accurate classification, it can implicate the involvement of hydrogen bonds in selective binding. This approach contrasts from methods that represent many aspects of protein structure because holistic representations cannot associate classification with just one characteristic. To our knowledge, HBcompare is the first technique with this capability. On five datasets of proteins that catalyze similar reactions with different preferred ligands, HBcompare correctly categorized proteins with similar ligand binding preferences 89.5% of the time. Using only hydrogen bond topology, classification accuracy with HBcompare surpassed standard structure-based comparison algorithms that use atomic coordinates. As a tool for implicating the role of hydrogen bonds in protein function categories, HBcompare represents a first step towards the automatic explanation of biochemical mechanisms.

Many tools that explore models of protein complexes are also able to analyze interactions between specific residues and atoms. A comprehensive exploration of these interactions can often uncover aspects of protein-protein recognition that are not obvious using other protein analysis techniques. This paper describes DiffBond, a novel method for searching for intermolecular interactions between protein complexes while differentiating between three different types of interaction: hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, and salt bridges. DiffBond incorporates textbook definitions of these three interactions while contending with uncertainties that are inherent in computational models of interacting proteins. We used it to examine the barnase-barstar, Rapla-raf, and Smad2-Smad4 complexes, as well as a subset of protein complexes formed between three-finger toxins and nAChRs. Based on electrostatic interactions established by previous experimental studies, DiffBond was able to identify ionic and hydrogen bonds with high precision and recall, and identify salt bridges with high precision. In combination with other electrostatic analysis methods, DiffBond can be a useful tool in helping predict influential amino acids in protein-protein interactions and characterizing the type of interaction.