Niko Schäpke

Mr. Niko Schäpke


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 August 2014 in Sustainability Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJulia M. Wittmayer
Julia M. Wittmayer
NSNiko Schäpke
Niko Schäpke

5 October 2020 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGuido Caniglia
Guido Caniglia
CLC. Luederitz
C. Luederitz
TWTimo Von Wirth
Timo Von Wirth
IFI. Fazey
I. Fazey
BMB. Martín-López
B. Martín-López
DLD. J. Lang
D. J. Lang

1 June 2018 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IFIoan Fazey
Ioan Fazey
NSNiko Schäpke
Niko Schäpke
GCGuido Caniglia
Guido Caniglia
JPJames Patterson
James Patterson
JHJohan Hultman
Johan Hultman
CWCarina Wyborn
Carina Wyborn

1 December 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristopher Luederitz
Christopher Luederitz
NSNiko Schäpke
Niko Schäpke
AWArnim Wiek
Arnim Wiek
DLDaniel J. Lang
Daniel J. Lang
MBMatthias Bergmann
Matthias Bergmann
FWFrances R. Westley
Frances R. Westley

1 January 2018 in GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNiko Schäpke
Niko Schäpke
FSFranziska Stelzer
Franziska Stelzer
GCGuido Caniglia
Guido Caniglia
MBMatthias Bergmann
Matthias Bergmann
MWMatthias Wanner
Matthias Wanner
DLDaniel J. Lang
Daniel J. Lang
Various experimental approaches of transformative research in real-world settings have emerged. Yet, similarities, differences, and specific contributions remain unclear. A characteristic-based comparison reveals complementarities and provides orientation.Real-world laboratories (RwLs, German Reallabore) belong to a family of increasingly popular experimental and transdisciplinary research approaches at the science-society interface. As these approaches in general, and RwLs in particular, often lack clear definitions of key characteristics and their operationalization, we make two contributions in this article. First, we identify five core characteristics of RwLs: contribution to transformation, experimental methods, transdisciplinary research mode, scalability and transferability of results, as well as scientific and societal learning and reflexivity. Second, we compare RwLs to similar research approaches according to the five characteristics. In this way, we provide an orientation on experimental and transdisciplinary research for societal transformations, and reveal the contributions of this type of research in supporting societal change. Our findings enable learning across the different approaches and highlight their complementarities, with a particular focus on RwLs.