Background: Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer therapy. While its role is well established in lung cancer and melanoma, its predictive value for breast and prostate cancers remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the predictive value of TMB for ICI therapy across four major cancer types—lung, melanoma, breast, and prostate—and to explore factors contributing to the variability in its effectiveness as a biomarker. Methods: A systematic search and a review of the literature were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies examining the relationship between TMB levels and clinical outcomes following ICI therapy in the specified cancers were analyzed. The data were synthesized to evaluate TMB’s predictive value and identify gaps in the current research. Results: High TMB consistently correlated with improved outcomes in lung cancer and melanoma, confirming its predictive utility in these cancers. Conversely, the findings for breast and prostate cancers were inconclusive. The variability in TMB’s predictive value for these cancers suggests the need for complementary biomarkers or refined criteria to enhance its reliability. Methodological inconsistencies in TMB evaluation were also noted as a significant limitation. Conclusions: TMB serves as a robust biomarker for predicting ICI response in lung cancer and melanoma, but demonstrates limited predictive utility in breast and prostate cancers. Future research should prioritize standardizing TMB assessment protocols and investigating additional biomarkers to improve treatment personalization for these cancer types.

Over the last years, repurposed agents have provided growing evidence of fast implementation in oncology treatment such as certain antimalarial, anthelmintic, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic agents. In this study, the four agents of choice were present in our patients’ daily treatment for nonmalignant-associated pathology and have known, light toxicity profiles. It is quite common for a given patient’s daily administration schedule to include two or three of these drugs for the duration of their treatment. We chose to review the latest literature concerning metformin, employed as a first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes; mebendazole, as an anthelmintic; atorvastatin, as a cholesterol-lowering drug; propranolol, used in cardiovascular diseases as a nonspecific inhibitor of beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors. At the same time, certain key action mechanisms make them feasible antitumor agents such as for mitochondrial ETC inhibition, activation of the enzyme adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, amelioration of endogenous hyperinsulinemia, inhibition of selective tyrosine kinases (i.e., VEGFR2, TNIK, and BRAF), and mevalonate pathway inhibition. Despite the abundance of results from in vitro and in vivo studies, the only solid data from randomized clinical trials confirm metformin-related oncological benefits for only a small subset of nondiabetic patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and early-stage colorectal cancer. At the same time, clinical studies confirm metformin-related detrimental/lack of an effect for lung, breast, prostate cancer, and glioblastoma. For atorvastatin we see a clinical oncological benefit in patients and head and neck cancer, with a trend towards radioprotection of critical structures, thus supporting the role of atorvastatin as a promising agent for concomitant association with radiotherapy. Propranolol-related increased outcomes were seen in clinical studies in patients with melanoma, breast cancer, and sarcoma.

Purpose: To assess the potential added value of the SPECT-CT quantitative analysis in metastatic breast cancer lesions detection and differentiation from degenerative lesions. Methods: This prospective monocentric study was conducted on 70 female patients who underwent SPECT-CT bone scans using ^99mTc–HDP that identified the presence of metastatic bone lesions and degenerative lesions in each patient. Once the lesions were identified, a quantitative analysis of radiotracer uptake was conducted. The highest one to five SUVmax values for both metastatic and degenerative bone lesions were identified in each patient and the data were then statistically analyzed. Results: The SUVmax value was significantly higher in metastatic bone lesions than in degenerative lesions (p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of SPECT-CT quantitative data analysis revealed a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 93.3% at a cut-off value of the SUVmax of 16.6 g/mL. Conclusion: Quantitative analysis performed using SPECT-CT data can improve the diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between metastatic bone lesions and degenerative lesions, thus leading to appropriate treatment and better follow-up in metastatic breast cancer patients.

The microbiota is the complex community of microorganisms that populate a particular environment in the human body, whereas the microbiome is defined by the entire habitat—microorganisms and their environment. The most abundant and, therefore, the most studied microbiome is that of the gastrointestinal tract. However, the microbiome of the female reproductive tract is an interesting research avenue, and this article explores its role in disease development. The vagina is the reproductive organ that hosts the largest number of bacteria, with a healthy profile represented mainly by Lactobacillus spp. On the other hand, the female upper reproductive tract (uterus, Fallopian tubes, ovaries) contains only a very small number of bacteria. Previously considered sterile, recent studies have shown the presence of a small microbiota here, but there are still debates on whether this is a physiologic or pathologic occurrence. Of particular note is that estrogen levels significantly influence the composition of the microbiota of the female reproductive tract. More and more studies show a link between the microbiome of the female reproductive tract and the development of gynecological cancers. This article reviews some of these findings.

Cancer continues to pose a considerable challenge to global health. In the search for innovative strategies to combat this complex enemy, the concept of universal cancer screening has emerged as a promising avenue for early detection and prevention. In contrast to targeted approaches that focus on specific populations or high-risk individuals, universal screening seeks to cast a wide net to detect incipient malignancies in different demographic groups. This paradigm shift in cancer care underscores the importance of comprehensive screening programs that go beyond conventional boundaries. As our understanding of the complex molecular and genetic basis of cancer deepens, the need to develop comprehensive screening methods becomes increasingly apparent. In this article, we look at the rationale and potential benefits of universal cancer screening.

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in tumor progression in ovarian cancer, but the complex mechanism and interaction with oxidative stress are not fully understood. Methods: A prospective study included 52 patients with ovarian adenocarcinoma stage IIIA-IV. Serum VEGF and reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as malondialdehyde and ceruloplasmin were measured. Results: VEGF levels were elevated (mean 1014.7 ± 165 pg/mL), especially in patients with macroscopic residual disease (1058 vs. 810 pg/mL, p = 0.0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6 and 40 months in patients with a very high VEGF (over 1200 pg/mL), 11 and 48 months in patients with VEGF between 1000–1200 pg/mL, 18 and 84 months in patients with VEGF between 800–1000 pg/mL, and not reached in patients with normal VEGF. Increased VEGF values were associated with a 2.6-fold increased risk of disease progression (HR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.69–3.99), and a 1.4-fold increased risk of death (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.15–1.91, p = 0.002). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate VEGF as a prognostic factor and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.814, p = 0.036 for PFS and 0.729, p = 0.043, for OS. There was a positive correlation between VEGF and malondialdehyde, Pearson coefficient of 0.35, p = 0.0001. Conclusions: VEGF and malondialdehyde are important prognostic markers in ovarian cancer, especially in macroscopic residual disease, and there is a positive correlation between angiogenesis and oxidative stress.