Kim Wei Chan

Dr. Kim Wei Chan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

15 March 2010 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HIHajar Iqbal Ismail
Hajar Iqbal Ismail
KCKim Wei Chan
Kim Wei Chan
AMABDALBASIT ADAM MARIOD
ABDALBASIT ADAM MARIOD
MIMaznah Ismail
Maznah Ismail

1 January 2017 in Journal of Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSu Chern Foo
Su Chern Foo
F.M. YusoffF.M. Yusoff
F.M. Yusoff
MIMaznah Ismail
Maznah Ismail
MBMahiran Basri
Mahiran Basri
SYSook Kun Yau
Sook Kun Yau
MEMahdi Ebrahimi
Mahdi Ebrahimi

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SIShahid Iqbal
Shahid Iqbal
UYUmer Younas
Umer Younas
SUSiraj Uddin
Siraj Uddin
KCKim Wei Chan
Kim Wei Chan
RSRaja Adil Sarfraz
Raja Adil Sarfraz
MUMd. Kamal Uddin
Md. Kamal Uddin
In this study, leaves of three indigenous varieties of Mulberry namely, Morus alba L., Morus nigra L. and Morus rubra L. were investigated for their antioxidant potential and their proximate composition was determined. The yields of 80% methanolic extracts ranged between 8.28–13.89%. The contents of total phenolics (TPC), total flavonoids (TFC) and ascorbic acid (AA) ranged between 16.21–24.37 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g, 26.41–31.28 mg rutin equivalent (RE)/g and 0.97–1.49 mg/g, respectively. The antioxidant activity of leaf extracts was evaluated by measuring 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) radical scavenging actity, 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS•+) radical cation scavenging capacity and ferric ion reducing power and values ranged between 1.89–2.12, 6.12–9.89 and 0.56–0.97 mM Trolox equivalent/g of dried leaves, respectively. The investigated features reveal good nutritive and antioxidant attributes of all the varieties with mutually significant differences.

1 April 2016 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNicholas M.H. Khong
Nicholas M.H. Khong
F.M. YusoffF.M. Yusoff
F.M. Yusoff
BJB. Jamilah
B. Jamilah
MBMahiran Basri
Mahiran Basri
MIMaznah Ismail
Maznah Ismail
JNJun Nishikawa
Jun Nishikawa

26 December 2018 in Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFATIN AINA ZULKHAIRI AMIN
FATIN AINA ZULKHAIRI AMIN
Suriana SabriSuriana Sabri
Suriana Sabri
SMSALMA MALIHAH MOHAMMAD
SALMA MALIHAH MOHAMMAD
MIMaznah Ismail
Maznah Ismail
KCKim Wei Chan
Kim Wei Chan
Norhasnida ZawawiNorhasnida Zawawi
Norhasnida Zawawi
Both honeybees (Apis spp.) and stingless bees (Trigona spp.) produce honeys with high nutritional and therapeutics value. Until recently, the information regarding potential health benefits of stingless bee honey (SBH) in medical databases is still scarce as compared to the common European bee honey (EBH) which is well known for their properties as therapeutic agents. Although there have been very few reports on SBH, empirically these products would have similar therapeutic quality as the EBH. In addition, due to the structure of the nest, few studies reported that the antimicrobial activity of SBH is a little bit stronger than EBH. Therefore, the composition of both the types of honey as well as the traditional uses and clinical applications were compared. The results of various studies on EBH and SBH from tissue culture research to randomised control clinical trials were collated in this review. Interestingly, there are many therapeutic properties that are unique to SBH. Therefore, SBH has a great potential to be developed for modern medicinal uses.