Programmed necrosis (necroptosis) is an alternative form of programmed cell death that is regulated by receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and 3-dependent, but is a caspase (CASP)-independent pathway. In the present study, to determine if necroptosis participates in bovine structural luteolysis, we investigated RIPK1 and RIPK3 expression throughout the estrous cycle, during prostaglandin F2α (PGF)-induced luteolysis in the bovine corpus luteum (CL), and in cultured luteal steroidogenic cells (LSCs) after treatment with selected luteolytic factors. In addition, effects of a RIPK1 inhibitor (necrostatin-1, Nec-1; 50 μM) on cell viability, progesterone secretion, apoptosis related factors and RIPKs expression, were evaluated. Expression of RIPK1 and RIPK3 increased in the CL tissue during both spontaneous and PGF-induced luteolysis (P < 0.05). In cultured LSCs, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF; 2.3 nM) in combination with interferon γ (IFNG; 2.5 nM) up-regulated RIPK1 mRNA and protein expression (P < 0.05). TNF + IFNG also up-regulated RIPK3 mRNA expression (P < 0.05), but not RIPK3 protein. Although Nec-1 prevented TNF + IFNG-induced cell death (P < 0.05), it did not affect CASP3 and CASP8 expression. Nec-1 decreased both RIPK1 and RIPK3 protein expression (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that RIPKs-dependent necroptosis is a potent mechanism responsible for bovine structural luteolysis induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Background: Prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) may differentially affect viability of luteal cells by inducing either proliferation or cell death (via apoptosis or necroptosis). The diverse effects of PGF_2α may depend on its local vs. systemic actions. In our study, we determined changes in expression of genes related to: (i) apoptosis: caspase (CASP) 3, CASP8, BCL2 associated X (BAX), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and (ii) necroptosis: receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1, RIPK3, cylindromatosis (CYLD), and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) in the early and mid-stage corpus luteum (CL) that accompany local (intra-CL) vs. systemic (i.m.) analogue of PGF_2α (aPGF_2α) actions. Cows at day 4 (n = 24) or day 10 (n = 24) of the estrous cycle were treated by injections as follows: (1) systemic saline, (2) systemic aPGF_2α (25 mg; Dinoprost), (3) local saline, (4) local aPGF_2α (2.5 mg; Dinoprost). After 4 h, CLs were collected by ovariectomy. Expression levels of mRNA and protein were investigated by RT-q PCR, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Results: We found that local and systemic administration of aPGF_2α in the early-stage CL resulted in decreased expression of CASP3 (P < 0.01), but CASP8 mRNA expression was up-regulated (P < 0.05). However, the expression of CASP3 was up-regulated after local aPGF_2α treatment in the middle-stage CL, whereas systemic aPGF_2α administration increased both CASP3 and CASP8 expression (P < 0.01). Moreover, we observed that both local and systemic aPGF_2α injections increased RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL expression in the middle-stage CL (P < 0.05) while CYLD expression was markedly higher after i.m. aPGF_2α injections (P < 0.001). Moreover, we investigated the localization of necroptotic factors (RIPK1, RIPK3, CYLD and MLKL) in bovine CL tissue after local and systemic aPGF_2α injections in the bovine CL. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated for the first time that genes related to cell death pathways exhibit stage-specific responses to PGF_2α administration depending on its local or systemic actions. Locally-acting PGF_2α plays a luteoprotective role by inhibiting apoptosis and necroptosis in the early CL. Necroptosis is a potent mechanism responsible for structural CL regression during PGF_2α-induced luteolysis in cattle.

In this paper, newly discovered mechanisms of atresia and cell death processes in bovine ovarian follicles are investigated. For this purpose the mRNA expression of receptor interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3) of the granulosa and theca cells derived from healthy and atretic follicles are studied. The follicles were assigned as either healthy or atretic based on the estradiol to progesterone ratio. A statistically significant difference was recorded for the mRNA expression of a RIPK1 and RIPK3 between granulosa cells from healthy and atretic follicles. To further investigate this result a systems biology approach was used. The genes playing roles in necroptosis, apoptosis and atresia were chosen and a network was created based on human genes annotated by the IMEx database in Cytoscape to identify hubs and bottle-necks. Moreover, correlation networks were built in the Cluepedia plug-in. The networks were created separately for terms describing apoptosis and programmed cell death. We demonstrate that necroptosis (RIPK—dependent cell death pathway) is an alternative mechanism responsible for death of bovine granulosa and theca cells. We conclude that both apoptosis and necroptosis occur in the granulosa cells of dominant follicles undergoing luteinisation and in the theca cells from newly selected follicles.

Prostaglandin (PG) F2α and its analogs (aPGF2α) are used to induce regression of the corpus luteum (CL); their administration during the middle stage of the estrous cycle causes luteolysis in cattle. However, the bovine CL is resistant to the luteolytic actions of aPGF2α in the early stage of the estrous cycle. The mechanisms underlying this differential luteal sensitivity, as well as acquisition of luteolytic sensitivity by the CL, are still not fully understood. Therefore, to characterize possible differences in response to aPGF2α administration, we aimed to determine changes in expression of genes related to (1) angiogenesis-fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2); and (2) steroidogenesis-steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR), cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily A member 1 (P450scc), and hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 β- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 (HSD3B) in early- and middle-stage CL that accompany local (intra-CL) versus systemic (i.m.) aPGF2α injection. Cows at d 4 (early stage) or d 10 (middle stage) of the estrous cycle were treated as follows: (1) systemic saline injection, (2) systemic aPGF2α injection (25 mg), (3) local saline injection, and (4) local aPGF2α injection (2.5 mg). Progesterone (P4) concentration was measured in jugular vein blood samples during the entire set of experiments. After 4 h of treatment, CL were collected by ovariectomy, and mRNA and protein expression levels were determined by reverse transcription quantitative-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Local and systemic aPGF2α injections upregulated FGF2 expression but decreased expression of VEGFA in both CL stages. Both aPGF2α injections increased the expression of STAR in early-stage CL, but downregulated it in middle-stage CL. In the early-stage CL, local administration of aPGF2α upregulated HSD3B, whereas systemic injection decreased its mRNA expression in early- and middle-stage CL. Moreover, we observed a decrease in the P4 level earlier after local aPGF2α injection than after systemic administration. These results indicate that aPGF2α acting locally may play a luteotrophic role in early-stage CL. The systemic effect of aPGF2α on the mRNA expression of genes participating in steroidogenesis seems to be more substantial than its local effect in middle-stage CL.

The participation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in ovarian function in cattle is still not fully understood. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine: (i) the immunolocalization, mRNA expression and tissue concentration of PPARα, PPARδ and PPARγ in the bovine corpus luteum (CL) (n = 40) throughout the estrous cycle, and (ii) the involvement of PPAR in PGF_2α-induced processes related to luteolysis. CL (n = 9) explants were cultured in the presence of PPAR antagonists (10⁻⁵ M) in combination with or without PGF_2α receptor antagonist (10⁻⁵ M) and PGF_2α (10⁻⁶ M). The mRNA and protein expression of PPARs was evaluated through qPCR, IHC, and ELISA, respectively. The results showed that PPAR mRNA and protein expression differed according to the luteal stages. PGF_2α upregulated PPARδ and PPARγ mRNA expression in the bovine CL in vitro, whereas PPARγ increased the inhibitory effect of PGF_2α by decreasing progesterone secretion and the mRNA expression of hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 β- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 (HSD3B1) in the CL explants; mRNA transcription of tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was increased. The obtained results indicate that the mRNA and protein expression of PPARs changes in the bovine CL throughout the estrous cycle and under the influence of PGF_2α. We suggest that isoform γ, among all examined PPARs, could be a factor involved in the regulation of PGF_2α-induced processes related to luteolysis in the bovine CL. Further studies are needed to understand the role of PPAR in luteal regression in the CL of cattle.