Mélanie L Beaulieu

Dr. Mélanie L Beaulieu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2010 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
MLMario Lamontagne
Mario Lamontagne
PBPaul E. Beaulé
Paul E. Beaulé

7 May 2021 in Sports Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
JAJames Anthony Ashton-Miller
James Anthony Ashton-Miller
EWEdward M. Wojtys
Edward M. Wojtys
This review identifies the three-dimensional knee loads that have the highest risk of injuring the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the athlete. It is the combination of the muscular resistance to a large knee flexion moment, an external reaction force generating knee compression, an internal tibial torque, and a knee abduction moment during a single-leg athletic manoeuvre such as landing from a jump, abruptly changing direction, or rapidly decelerating that results in the greatest ACL loads. While there is consensus that an anterior tibial shear force is the primary ACL loading mechanism, controversy exists regarding the secondary order of importance of transverse-plane and frontal-plane loading in ACL injury scenarios. Large knee compression forces combined with a posteriorly and inferiorly sloped tibial plateau, especially the lateral plateau—an important ACL injury risk factor—causes anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation, which increases ACL loading. Furthermore, while the ACL can fail under a single supramaximal loading cycle, recent evidence shows that it can also fail following repeated submaximal loading cycles due to microdamage accumulating in the ligament with each cycle. This challenges the existing dogma that non-contact ACL injuries are predominantly due to a single manoeuvre that catastrophically overloads the ACL.

3 June 2009 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
Mario LamontagneMario Lamontagne
Mario Lamontagne
LXLanyi Xu
Lanyi Xu

21 September 2016 in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEdward M. Wojtys
Edward M. Wojtys
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
JAJames A. Ashton‐Miller
James A. Ashton‐Miller
In this paper, we review a series of studies that we initiated to examine mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in the hope that these injuries, and their sequelae, can be better prevented. First, using the earliest in vitro model of a simulated single‐leg jump landing or pivot cut with realistic knee loading rates and trans‐knee muscle forces, we identified the worst‐case dynamic knee loading that causes the greatest peak ACL strain: Combined knee compression, flexion, and internal tibial rotation. We also identified morphologic factors that help explain individual susceptibility to ACL injury. Second, using the above knee loading, we introduced a possible paradigm shift in ACL research by demonstrating that the human ACL can fail by a sudden rupture in response to repeated sub‐maximal knee loading. If that load is repeated often enough over a short time interval, the failure tended to occur proximally, as observed clinically. Third, we emphasize the value of a physical exam of the hip by demonstrating how limited internal axial rotation at the hip both increases the susceptibility to ACL injury in professional athletes, and also increases peak ACL strain during simulated pivot landings, thereby further increasing the risk of ACL fatigue failure. When training at‐risk athletes, particularly females with their smaller ACL cross‐sections, rationing the number and intensity of worst‐case knee loading cycles, such that ligament degradation is within the ACL's ability to remodel, should decrease the risk for ACL rupture due to ligament fatigue failure. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 34:2059–2068, 2016.

1 February 2017 in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KBKatherine M. Bojicic
Katherine M. Bojicic
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
DKDaniel Y. Imaizumi Krieger
Daniel Y. Imaizumi Krieger
JAJames A. Ashton-Miller
James A. Ashton-Miller
EWEdward M. Wojtys
Edward M. Wojtys
While body mass index (BMI), a modifiable parameter, and knee morphology, a nonmodifiable parameter, have been identified as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, the interaction between them remains unknown. An understanding of this interaction is important because greater compressive axial force (perhaps due to greater BMI) applied to a knee that is already at an increased risk because of its geometry, such as a steep lateral posterior tibial slope, could further increase the probability of ACL injury. To quantify the relationship between BMI and select knee morphological parameters as potential risk factors for ACL injury. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Sagittal knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) files from 76 ACL-injured and 42 uninjured subjects were gathered from the University of Michigan Health System’s archive. The posterior tibial slope (PTS), middle cartilage slope (MCS), posterior meniscus height (PMH), and posterior meniscus bone angle (MBA) in the lateral compartment were measured using MRI. BMI was calculated from demographic data. The association between the knee structural factors, BMI, and ACL injury risk was explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. PTS (P = .043) and MCS (P = .037) significantly predicted ACL injury risk. As PTS and MCS increased by 1°, odds of sustaining an ACL injury increased by 12% and 13%, respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis, which included PTS, BMI centered around the mean (cBMI), and their interaction, showed that this interaction predicted the odds of ACL rupture (P = .050; odds ratio, 1.03). For every 1-unit increase in BMI from the average that is combined with a 1° increase in PTS, the odds of an ACL tear increased by 15%. An increase in BMI was associated with increased risk of ACL tear in the presence of increased lateral posterior tibial slope. Larger values of PTS or MCS were associated with an increased risk of ACL tear.

1 October 2008 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMélanie L Beaulieu
Mélanie L Beaulieu
MLMario Lamontagne
Mario Lamontagne
LXLanyi Xu
Lanyi Xu
The purpose of this study is to compare the time-frequency characteristic, using nonlinearly scaled wavelets, of the EMG signal as well as the three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematics of female and male elite soccer players performing an unanticipated cutting maneuver. Fifteen female and 15 male elite soccer players performed several cutting maneuvers during which EMG of eight muscles of the leg and 3D kinematics of the knee were recorded. To create an unanticipated condition, the participants executed one of three tasks, which were signaled to them with an illuminated target board. Male participants generally executed the unanticipated cutting maneuver with a quadriceps activation of higher frequency components. These gender differences were also found at initial ground contact (IC) for the vastii and biceps femoris (BF) muscles. These higher frequencies dominated the signal earlier in time for the BF and later for the tibialis anterior (TA) in women. Furthermore, women performed the cutting task with greater knee abduction than did the men. Female athletes adopted a different motor unit recruitment strategy that was particularly evident at, and near, IC resulting in lower frequency components in the EMG signal of the lateral hamstring. This strategy may play a role in explaining the gender bias in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rates. Gender differences in knee kinematics were also observed, exposing the female ACL to higher strain, which may be the result of differences in neuromuscular strategies to stabilize the knee joint.