Andrea K Boggild

Dr. Andrea K Boggild

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2010 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild
Francesco CastelliFrancesco Castelli
Francesco Castelli
PGPhilippe Gautret
Philippe Gautret
Joseph TorresiJoseph Torresi
Joseph Torresi
FSFrank von Sonnenburg
Frank von Sonnenburg
MWMary E. Wilson
Mary E. Wilson

1 February 2007 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild
MPMonica E. Parise
Monica E. Parise
LLLinda S. Lewis
Linda S. Lewis
KKKevin C. Kain
Kevin C. Kain
The fixed dose combination of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride, marketed under the trade name Malarone™, is the most recently approved agent in North America for the prevention and treatment of chloroquine- and multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In both adult and pediatric populations, atovaquone-proguanil demonstrates consistently high protective efficacy against P. falciparum, and in treatment trials, cure rates exceed 93%. Only a handful of genetically confirmed treatment failures have been reported to date. Atovaquone-proguanil has an excellent safety profile during both prophylaxis and treatment courses, with severe adverse events rarely reported. This topical review will examine the evidence behind the current indications for use of atovaquone-proguanil, and will summarize the current body of literature surrounding safety and tolerability.

23 October 2018 in Current Infectious Disease Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAvinash N. Mukkala
Avinash N. Mukkala
JKJason Kwan
Jason Kwan
RLRachel Lau
Rachel Lau
DHDavid Harris
David Harris
DKDylan Kain
Dylan Kain
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild

1 May 2009 in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild
DMDonald S. Martin
Donald S. Martin
TLTheresa YuLing Lee
Theresa YuLing Lee
BYBilly Yu
Billy Yu
DLDonald E. Low
Donald E. Low
Amoebic keratitis causes significant ocular morbidity in contact lens wearers. Current diagnostic methods for amoebic keratitis are insensitive and labor-intensive and have poor turnaround time. We evaluated four laboratory methods for detection of acanthamoebae in clinical specimens. Deidentified, delinked consecutive specimens from patients with suspected amoebic keratitis were assayed for acanthamoebae by direct smear analysis, culture, and PCR using two different primer sets specific for Acanthamoeba ribosomal DNA. The consensus reference standard was considered fulfilled when the results for any two of the four tests were positive, and the outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity. Of 107 specimens assayed over an 18-month period, 20 were positive for acanthamoebae. The sensitivity and specificity of each assay were as follows, respectively: for smear analysis, 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.2 to 76.8%) and 100%; for culture, 73.7% (95% CI, 54.4 to 93.0%) and 100%; for PCR using Nelson primers, 90% (95% CI, 76.9 to 100%) and 90.8% (95% CI, 84.7 to 96.9%); and for PCR using JDP primers, 65% (95% CI, 44.1 to 85.9%) and 100%. Nelson primer PCR demonstrated a single-organism level of analytic sensitivity. The performance characteristics of the assays varied by specimen type, with contact lenses and casings showing the highest rates of detectable acanthamoebae and the highest diagnostic sensitivities for direct smear analysis, culture, and JDP primer PCR, though these results are based on small numbers and should be interpreted cautiously. These findings have important implications for clinicians collecting diagnostic specimens and for diagnostic laboratories, especially in outbreak situations.

30 July 2019 in Journal of Travel Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild
ECEric Caumes
Eric Caumes
MGMartin P Grobusch
Martin P Grobusch
ESEli Schwartz
Eli Schwartz
NHNoreen A Hynes
Noreen A Hynes
FSFrank von Sonnenburg
Frank von Sonnenburg
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) may be emerging among international travellers and migrants. Limited data exist on mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) in travellers. We describe the epidemiology of travel-associated CL and MCL among international travellers and immigrants over a 20-year period through descriptive analysis of GeoSentinel data. Demographic and travel-related data on returned international travellers diagnosed with CL or MCL at a GeoSentinel Surveillance Network site between 1 September 1997 and 31 August 2017 were analysed. A total of 955 returned travellers or migrants were diagnosed with travel-acquired CL (n = 916) or MCL during the study period, of whom 10% (n = 97) were migrants. For the 858 non-migrant travellers, common source countries were Bolivia (n = 156, 18.2%) and Costa Rica (n = 97, 11.3%), while for migrants, they were Syria (n = 34, 35%) and Afghanistan (n = 22, 22.7%). A total of 99 travellers (10%) acquired their disease on trips of ≤ 2 weeks. Of 274 cases for which species identification was available, Leishmania Viannia braziliensis was the most well-represented strain (n = 117, 42.7%), followed by L. major (n = 40, 14.6%) and L. V. panamensis (n = 38, 13.9%). Forty cases of MCL occurred, most commonly in tourists (n = 29, 72.5%) and from Bolivia (n = 18, 45%). A total of 10% of MCL cases were acquired in the Old World. Among GeoSentinel reporting sites, CL is predominantly a disease of tourists travelling mostly to countries in Central and South America such as Bolivia where risk of acquiring L. V. braziliensis and subsequent MCL is high. The finding that some travellers acquired leishmaniasis on trips of short duration challenges the common notion that CL is a disease of prolonged travel. Migrants from areas of conflict and political instability, such as Afghanistan and Syria, were well represented, suggesting that as mass migration of refugees continues, CL will be increasingly encountered in intake countries.

1 January 2010 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAndrea K Boggild
Andrea K Boggild
BVBraulio Mark Valencia
Braulio Mark Valencia
DEDiego Espinosa
Diego Espinosa
NVNicolas Veland
Nicolas Veland
ARAna Pilar Ramos
Ana Pilar Ramos
DLDonald E. Low
Donald E. Low
Background. Traditional detection of Leishmania from ulcers involves collection of invasive specimens that cause discomfort, require technical expertis