Stephen R Shamblen

Dr. Stephen R Shamblen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2009 in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRChristopher L. Ringwalt
Christopher L. Ringwalt
HCHeddy Kovach Clark
Heddy Kovach Clark
SHSean Hanley
Sean Hanley
SSStephen R Shamblen
Stephen R Shamblen
RFRobert L. Flewelling
Robert L. Flewelling
Objective To evaluate the effects of Project ALERT on adolescents' lifetime and 30-day use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants. Design Cluster randomized trial. Setting Schools from 11 states were enrolled in 2 successive cohorts from 2004 to 2008. Participants All public schools in the United States that included grades 6 through 8 and enrolled at least 100 students in sixth grade were recruited. Of the 40 schools that began the study, 34 (17 per condition) completed it. Data were analyzed from 5883 unique participants. Intervention Project ALERT, a manualized classroom-based substance use prevention curriculum for the middle grades, was taught to sixth and seventh graders. Main Outcome Measures Students were surveyed before the onset of the intervention, as sixth graders, and after the completion of the 2-year intervention, as seventh graders. Outcome measures included lifetime and 30-day use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants. Results At baseline, students in the intervention condition were slightly to moderately more likely to report use for each of the 8 measures examined than were students in the control condition. For all measures except lifetime use of cigarettes, these differences were less pronounced at follow-up and therefore were in the direction of favorable program effects. These changes were statistically significant, however, for only 1 outcome measure, past 30-day use of alcohol (reduction in the adjusted odds ratio from 2.07 at baseline to 1.32 at follow-up; P = .006). Conclusion Project ALERT was not effective when delivered to the sixth grade population we targeted. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00650585

1 December 2014 in Evaluation and Program Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBCatherine J. Binkley
Catherine J. Binkley
KJKnowlton W Johnson
Knowlton W Johnson
MAMelissa Abadi
Melissa Abadi
KTKirsten Thompson
Kirsten Thompson
SSStephen R Shamblen
Stephen R Shamblen
BZBrigit Zaksek
Brigit Zaksek
This article presents an oral health (OH) strategy and pilot study focusing on individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) living in group homes. The strategy consists of four components: (1) planned action in the form of the behavioral contract and caregiver OH action planning; (2) capacity building through didactic and observation learning training; (3) environmental adaptations consisting of additional oral heath devices and strategies to create a calm atmosphere; and (4) reinforcement by post-training coaching. A pilot study was conducted consisting of pre- and post-assessment data collected 1 week before and 1 week after implementing a 1-month OH strategy. The study sample comprised 11 group homes with 21 caregivers and 25 residents with IDD from one service organization in a Midwestern city. A process evaluation found high-quality implementation of the OH strategy as measured by dosage, fidelity, and caregiver reactions to implementing the strategy. Using repeated cross-sectional and repeated measures analyses, we found statistically significant positive changes in OH status and oral hygiene practices of residents. Caregiver self-efficacy as a mechanism of change was not adequately evaluated; however, positive change was found in some but not all types of caregiver OH support that were assessed. Lessons learned from implementing the pilot study intervention and evaluation are discussed, as are the next steps in conducting an efficacy study of the OH strategy.


18 October 2012 in Family Process
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSStephen R Shamblen
Stephen R Shamblen
BABrooke B. Arnold
Brooke B. Arnold
PMPatrick Mckiernan
Patrick Mckiernan
DCDavid A. Collins
David A. Collins
TSTed N. Strader
Ted N. Strader


SCShilo St. Cyr
Shilo St. Cyr
EJElise Jaramillo
Elise Jaramillo
LGLaura Garrison
Laura Garrison
LMLorraine Halinka Malcoe
Lorraine Halinka Malcoe
SSStephen R Shamblen
Stephen R Shamblen
CWCathleen E. Willging
Cathleen E. Willging
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a common feature in the lives of incarcerated women returning to rural communities, enhancing their risk of mental ill-health, substance use, and recidivism. Women’s experiences of IPV intersect with challenges across multiple social–ecological levels, including risky or criminalizing interpersonal relationships, geographic isolation, and persistent gender, racial, and economic inequities. We conducted quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with 99 incarcerated women in New Mexico who were scheduled to return to micropolitan or non-core areas within 6 months. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed separately and then triangulated to identify convergences and divergences in data. The findings underscore how individual and interpersonal experiences of IPV, substance use, and psychological distress intersect with broad social inequities, such as poverty, lack of supportive resources, and reluctance to seek help due to experiences of discrimination. These results point to the need for a more proactive response to the mutually constitutive cycle of IPV, mental distress, incarceration, and structures of violence to improve reentry for women returning to rural communities. Policy and treatment must prioritize socioeconomic marginalization and expand community resources with attention to the needs of rural women of color.