Damir Medak

Dr. Damir Medak

Department of Geoinformation Science, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LRLuka Rumora
Luka Rumora
Mario MilerMario Miler
Mario Miler
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak
Atmospheric correction is one of the key parts of remote sensing preprocessing because it can influence and change the final classification result. This research examines the impact of five different atmospheric correction processing on land cover classification accuracy using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Those are surface reflectance (SREF), standardized surface reflectance (STDSREF), Sentinel-2 atmospheric correction (S2AC), image correction for atmospheric effects (iCOR), dark object subtraction (DOS) and top of the atmosphere (TOA) reflectance without any atmospheric correction. Sentinel-2 images corrected with stated atmospheric corrections were classified using four different machine learning classification techniques namely extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and catboost (CB). For classification, five different classes were used: bare land, low vegetation, high vegetation, water and built-up area. SVM classification provided the best overall result for twelve dates, for all atmospheric corrections. It was the best method for both cases: when using Sentinel-2 bands and radiometric indices and when using just spectral bands. The best atmospheric correction for classification with SVM using radiometric indices is S2AC with the median value of 96.54% and the best correction without radiometric indices is STDSREF with the median value of 96.83%.

18 March 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nikola KranjčićNikola Kranjčić
Nikola Kranjčić
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak
RŽRobert Župan
Robert Župan
MRMilan Rezo
Milan Rezo
The most commonly used model for analyzing satellite imagery is the Support Vector Machine (SVM). Since there are a large number of possible variables for use in SVM, this paper will provide a combination of parameters that fit best for extracting green urban areas from Copernicus mission satellite images. This paper aims to provide a combination of parameters to extract green urban areas with the highest degree of accuracy, in order to speed up urban planning and ultimately improve town environments. Two different towns in Croatia were investigated, and the results provide an optimal combination of parameters for green urban areas extraction with an overall kappa index of 0.87 and 0.89, which demonstrates a very high classification accuracy.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nikola KranjčićNikola Kranjčić
Nikola Kranjčić
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak
RŽRobert Župan
Robert Župan
MRMilan Rezo
Milan Rezo
Rapid urbanization in cities can result in a decrease in green urban areas. Reductions in green urban infrastructure pose a threat to the sustainability of cities. Up-to-date maps are important for the effective planning of urban development and the maintenance of green urban infrastructure. There are many possible ways to map vegetation; however, the most effective way is to apply machine learning methods to satellite imagery. In this study, we analyze four machine learning methods (support vector machine, random forest, artificial neural network, and the naïve Bayes classifier) for mapping green urban areas using satellite imagery from the Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument. The methods are tested on two cities in Croatia (Varaždin and Osijek). Support vector machines outperform random forest, artificial neural networks, and the naïve Bayes classifier in terms of classification accuracy (a Kappa value of 0.87 for Varaždin and 0.89 for Osijek) and performance time.

28 May 2019 in Geocarto International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuka Rumora
Luka Rumora
Mario MilerMario Miler
Mario Miler
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak
Atmospheric correction is used to remove atmospheric effects on remotely sensed imagery, so it could change its properties and, in the end, all the derived results from it. The objective of this research was to analyse the effect of different atmospheric corrections on radiometric indices using Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 satellite. Radiometric indices used in this research are Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), Normalized difference water index (NDWI), Soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and Modified soil-adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI). The analysis was done using five pairs of contemporary images from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2. Based on those images, our results indicate that NDVI values between those two datasets did not have a statistically significant difference (p >0.05) and have the strongest correlation for all used atmospheric corrections (r1 = 0.989, r2 = 0.967, r3 = 0.983). We concluded that it is possible to combine radiometric indices values from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 data.

1 July 2019 in Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mateo GašparovićMateo Gašparović
Mateo Gašparović
LRLuka Rumora
Luka Rumora
Mario MilerMario Miler
Mario Miler
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak
Satellite image fusion techniques have been used for more than two decades. Development of satellite sensors for very high-resolution satellite imagery monitoring contributed to the development of new image fusion techniques. We examine the quality of Ehlers, Brovey transform, modified intensity–hue–saturation (M-IHS), and high-filter resolution merge fusion methods on vegetation indices values combining high-resolution WorldView-4 and low-resolution Sentinel-2 imagery. For image fusion, four bands—blue, green, red, and near-infrared—were used. The effect of fusing Sentinel-2 and WorldView-4 imagery is tested on the various vegetation indices [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), blue normalized difference vegetation index (BNDVI), and green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI)]. M-IHS fusion showed the best result, with the least difference between indices calculated based on the original Sentinel-2 and fused bands. Difference between vegetation indices calculated using original Sentinel-2 and M-IHS fused bands for 30.08.2015, 30.09.2016, and 30.09.2017 is between −0.041 to 0.037. The second part of this research is an evaluation of three different vegetation classes (grassland, mixed vegetation, and forest) on three different years and three different months within a year. Difference between NDVI, GNDVI, and BNDVI calculated based on the original Sentinel-2, and M-IHS fused bands are ranging from −0.043 to 0.103, −0.041 to 0.050, and −0.052 to 0.030 for grassland, mixed vegetation, and forest, respectively. On the other hand, the difference between vegetation indices for grassland, mixed vegetation, and forest are from −0.110 to 0.050, −0.041 to 0.038, and −0.052 to 0.038, when observing August, September, and October of 2017, respectively.

6 June 2020 in Urban Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLuka Rumora
Luka Rumora
IMIvan Majic
Ivan Majic
Mario MilerMario Miler
Mario Miler
DMDamir Medak
Damir Medak